Board Logo
« New Roswell document? »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 22nd, 2009, 08:06am



Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 Image  Author  Topic: New Roswell document?  (Read 189 times)
Luvey
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage

member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 3088
xx New Roswell document?
« Thread started on: Oct 26th, 2009, 10:07am »

New Roswell UFO Document?

The Roswell UFO crash story has seemed to have spawned another fake document. This one, supposed to have come from the CIA, comes to me via England, which always raises my suspicions. Why would a classified, American document find its way to British hands first? But even if one did, this particular one didn’t. It isn’t real.

Read the full article at: http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2009/10/new-roswell-ufo-document.html
User IP Logged

Chinese Proverb:
"When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others."
Luvey
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage

member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 3088
xx Re: New Roswell document?
« Reply #1 on: Oct 27th, 2009, 12:13pm »

More on this.....yet another carefully-crafted paper designed to provoke utter confusion...

Roswell, White Sands and the V-2 Saga: The Controversy Continues by Nick Redfern

On Saturday, October 17, 2009, Kevin Randle posted to his blog - A Different Perspective - a new article titled The Roswell UFO and Jesse Marcel.

The article has generated a tremendous number of comments, including one from Bob Koford, who cited a link to a British website that referenced the crash of a V-2 rocket near Roswell, New Mexico on July 4, 1947 - a rocket containing a "biological payload."

The relevant data can be found at:

http://www.rocketservices.co.uk/spacelists/sounding_rockets/decades/1944-1949.htm

The "biological payload" should not be construed as having any connections with alien bodies, human bodies or monkeys, however (at the time at issue, rats, insects and other small creatures were very much the order of the day with respect to the payloads aboard the V-2 flights out of White Sands). And, indeed, it must be stressed that Bob K did not imply that the payload was anything out of the ordinary.

Read the whole article at: http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/10/roswell-white-sands-and-v-2-saga.html
User IP Logged

Chinese Proverb:
"When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others."
GForce
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage

member is offline

Avatar

Life isn't always easy, but it beats the alternative!


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 2574
xx Re: New Roswell document?
« Reply #2 on: Oct 28th, 2009, 12:59am »

Thanks Luvey for the links! They serve as a reminder that we all should be a bit of a skeptic when reviewing evidence! It's often hard to tell a hoax or disinformation from something that MIGHT be real!
User IP Logged

Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 12,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site


New Monthly Ad-Free Plan!

$6.99 Gets 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!
| Free Shoutboxes | Hookah |

This Board Hosted For FREE By Conforums ©
Get Your Own Free Message Board!