Board Logo
« #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK ISAAC »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Aug 19th, 2017, 06:21am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76  ...  110 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK ISAAC  (Read 12502 times)
WatchingWaiting
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 75
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1095 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 4:40pm »

on Jul 11th, 2007, 3:31pm, j w wright wrote:
they would be very well done cgi, if they were... but i think you;re right, they're real, whatever they are

the edges of the i beams, where you see the reflections are convex, which distort the reflections like a fish eye lens

what you are expecting is what the reflections would look like if the surfaces were flat, like mirrors


The fact they are convex doesn't answer why the inside reflection reflects the bottom of the U and not the opposite side. It also doesn't explain how the outside edge reflects something below the "equator" above the "equator". How do you explain the lettering reflection "offset"?

I have notice that the circular "o" symbol seems to be a word/phrase break.
User IP Logged

Marvin
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mmm, yes, very curious, very interesting....


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 1119
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1096 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 4:47pm »

on Jul 11th, 2007, 3:40pm, j w wright wrote:
you gotta be born with it:

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=lang_en&newwindow=1&safe=off&as_qdr=all&q=entomology+%22Hive+Scent%22


Yea, I know… I was just teasing ya.


on Jul 11th, 2007, 3:43pm, MarkM wrote:
j w wrote: "which would make the glyphs have real shape, like actual objects..."

Yes. In a post awhile back regarding the holographic nature of the symbols, I suggested that we equate them more with sculpture rather than with print. They can be "entered" from an infinite number of directions.


I don’t know… I just have to wonder if the craft came with an optical reader option…. Nanotechnology would make more sense than holographics but we are speculating again.


on Jul 11th, 2007, 3:51pm, urantia606 wrote:
Just to set the record straight, dhq, you are 100% wrong.

The Roswell story began on the day it happened in July 1947. The Army said it had captured a 'flying disk'. The news went worldwide!

Within 24 hours the Army changed it's story. It then said that a 'weather balloon' had landed and the whole affair was just a lot of nothing.

Please get your facts correct before you post here....otherwise your credibility is zero.


I have to agree with urantia606, “Roswell” is well documented as an occurrence… we just do not have proof as to what “crashed” there.
User IP Logged

Oh Goody! My Illudiom Pu-36 Explosive Space Modulator!

User Image

"You naughty earth specimens!"
urantia606
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 354
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1097 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 5:24pm »

Linda Howe has just posted two reports by engineers as to their opinion of the Drones....a great read. We haven't heard the end of this by a long shot.

Stand by for many more revelations........

http://earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1284&category=Environment
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 5:34pm by urantia606 » User IP Logged

figneutron
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

The Great Way is not difficult for those who do not pick or choose.


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 162
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1098 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 5:41pm »

on Jul 11th, 2007, 3:13pm, DrDil wrote:

Thanks for that, while we’re on the subject I feel again it’s necessary to state what the far reaching implications of this information actually were. In fact I already have, here’s the quote,
(a reply to J W)



Dr. Dil, I strongly agree that the inclusion of the mission statement and the definition of extraction in a summary research report are very fishy. My issue here is this: how could someone as intelligent and as crafty as Isaac blunder so? Wouldn't he have realized prior to its release that this document would be scrutinized by some very, very bright, inquisitive, and knowledgeable people who would jump all over any clear incongruity in the text? Or did his anxiety get the better of his judgement, and so he overdid it, going high-and mighty to ensure its authenticity? Did he try too hard to impress elsewhere, that is, in his narration and exposition? I suspect so. At places the tone smacks of emotionalism, perhaps even sensationalism, and this doesn't gibe with the writing of a disciplined, top scientist or engineer.
User IP Logged

MarkM
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1099 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 5:51pm »

FIGNUETRON wrote: "At places the tone smacks of emotionalism, perhaps even sensationalism, and this doesn't gibe with the writing of a disciplined, top scientist or engineer."

Are you talking about Isaacs cover letter?

If so, that's a kind of stereotypical statement, don't you think? I grew up around scientists and I can tell you some of them were very emotional when they spoke of the wonders around them. And I can assure you, these were "top" scientists (your word).

My goodness, if I were expressing myself in an introductory letter about a subject as profound and mind blowing as this, I'd be pretty darned emotional, too.
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 5:53pm by MarkM » User IP Logged

oljack666
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1100 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:14pm »

Within the one email to LMH the writer stated Isaac means, "he laughs". Don't take it too literal even though the church has because in all Biblical translations, it states the following.

And Sarah said, God has made me laugh: all that hear will laugh with me.

So, maybe what Isaac was saying was, "all that hear will laugh with me". Essentially, not laughing at us however laughing with us.

American Standard Version
Bible in Basic English
Darby’s Translation
King James Version
World English Bible
Young’s Literal Translation
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:17pm by oljack666 » User IP Logged

LangLee
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1101 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:21pm »

on Jul 11th, 2007, 3:09pm, MarkM wrote:
Agree, DrDil, one would think security would be better!

OK, it took me less than ten minutes to do this. I Googled starships (image search), got a big chart of Star Trek craft, picked the craft closest to the BB drone, flipped it 180 degrees, inverted the BB photo (so the colors would be visually consistent between the two images), and - AMAZING! Proof that the BB craft was a rip off of Star Trek.

Sorry, similar doesn't cut it.

User Image


What's similar ? The outline kinda, maybe, sorta, other than that, nothing.
You want to compare ? Take item 14b from Q3- 85 Inventory Review, then blow up the Big basin image and look at the ring with the arm attached. they are the same right down to tab that the arm attaches to, the only thing I can't see are the crosses on the curved blocks on the bottom. you'll also notice the shading from the arm to the left, half light, light, dark, long light. Item 14b from top down right, half light, light, dark, long light partially shaded.
The characters on the arms of the Capitola Craft and Big Basin are also different. The only part from the Capitola Craft that is shown with a resemblence is the "Flap" with spikes on it. Though it looks to be too small for that one.
User IP Logged

urantia606
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 354
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1102 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:22pm »

on Jul 11th, 2007, 5:41pm, figneutron wrote:
Dr. Dil, I strongly agree that the inclusion of the mission statement and the definition of extraction in a summary research report are very fishy. My issue here is this: how could someone as intelligent and as crafty as Isaac blunder so? Wouldn't he have realized prior to its release that this document would be scrutinized by some very, very bright, inquisitive, and knowledgeable people who would jump all over any clear incongruity in the text? Or did his anxiety get the better of his judgement, and so he overdid it, going high-and mighty to ensure its authenticity? Did he try too hard to impress elsewhere, that is, in his narration and exposition? I suspect so. At places the tone smacks of emotionalism, perhaps even sensationalism, and this doesn't gibe with the writing of a disciplined, top scientist or engineer.


Hey, Fig, isn't the tone of your last post a little emotional? You even call Isaac, crafty. I know you disregard the whole Drone story but try and stay calm and not become too ruffled and agitated.
User IP Logged

MarkM
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1103 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:25pm »

LangLee - Did you read this thread? I think you totally missed my point. Someone said that similar is not good enough - I was illustrating that very point!
User IP Logged

MarkM
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1104 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:28pm »

The emails that LMH received go a long way toward backing up Isaacs info. The last thing I would worry about is someone picking up on the meaning of the name Isaac and using it as fuel for arguing that it might be a joke. That would be one amazing stretch smiley! But, then again, there are folks who are definitely stretching ..... wink
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:29pm by MarkM » User IP Logged

LangLee
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1105 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:34pm »

on Jul 11th, 2007, 6:25pm, MarkM wrote:
LangLee - Did you read this thread? I think you totally missed my point. Someone said that similar is not good enough - I was illustrating that very point!


I know MarkM, I was just getting my observations in there. Maybe someone will see something else I didn't.
Need better Big Basin pics like the Capitola pics.

I've read quite a bit on other sites about this. They are taking the weakest pics of the bunch, Lake Tahoe, and screaming Photshop. I admit they do look too something, but there has been little or no mention of the Capitola pics. I did see that someone said the lighting was wrong, then someone did a time/sun check and that was that.
They are simply the most compelling pics of the bunch, the sequence entire is really , really good, but there is no mention of it at all.
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:45pm by LangLee » User IP Logged

castles4me
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1106 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:49pm »

Isaac in the bible is also called the "son of promise" because God made a covenant with Abraham that he would be the father of many nations and have more descendants than there are stars in heaven. Abraham though, was too old to have children as was his wife, Sarah. They waited a long time in faith, but then Sarah thought she would sideswipe God's plan and told Abraham to go ahead and have a child with Hagar the maid. Ishmael was that son. Later on, Sarah did have Isaac, the "son of promise" so she made Hagar go away with Ishmael. Isaac went on to fulfill God's covenant in the Earth and was the father of Jacob who was later named "Israel" who had 12 sons that became the 12 Tribes of Israel (Jewish people) and many other nations were born. Ishmael went on to have 12 sons which are the fathers of all of the Arab nations (Muhamad is a descendant of Ishmael) -- and basically they are still mad at the "zionists" and want Israeli's blown off the face of the map -- all for this several thousand year old battle over the birthright. -- God's city -- Jerusalem. Why do you think that all of the focus is always about Jerusalem? One tiny little spot on the planet? It's all a spiritual war.

lol sorry about that -- I just started writing about Isaac and got off into the whole subject. smiley
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 7:13pm by castles4me » User IP Logged

WatchingWaiting
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 75
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1107 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:57pm »

The report was obviously meant for non scientists. Introductory statements should be included in case there are any new members of the "review committee". Perhaps the reviewers were not cleared for the very most sensitive information, hence the blacked out sections. If Isaac was in a management role he may have been involved in the preparation of the report, hence the original photos. Perhaps the copy he smuggled out was an extra copy meant for a missing attendee, and as such might not be missed.

Some things to remember about what Isaac released:

1. He released only information immediately pertinent to the drone sightings.

2. He released a photo showing objects that are visible in the Chad/Tahoe/etc photos. That page was page 56 of an inventory report. What was on the first 55 pages? How many more pages are in that report?

3. He released a quarterly research report showing an object with the same "writing" as the drones. To help prove authenticity he provided the original color prints used is the report. This report also mentions another document PACL-D0006 PACL Extraction Procedure Guide. This shows that the reverse engineering process was well defined.

4. He released pages 119-123 of a Linguistic Analysis Primer. This is to put into context what was discussed in the quarterly research report. Again, what is on the first 118 pages and following pages?

Isaac only provided verification that the drones are real and the writing is real. Can you imagine what the first 118 pages of that primer are like? Or what is on the rest of that inventory list? What other technologies does he know about that he hasn't shared yet?
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 6:59pm by WatchingWaiting » User IP Logged

castles4me
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1108 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 7:03pm »

on Jul 11th, 2007, 6:57pm, WatchingWaiting wrote:
Isaac only provided verification that the drones are real and the writing is real. Can you imagine what the first 118 pages of that primer are like? Or what is on the rest of that inventory list? What other technologies does he know about that he hasn't shared yet?


Very good summation Watch! Yes, people are trying to make sense of the information Isaac sent, as if it was a complete body of information, but it is in no way complete. This was just a taste, as you said, just enough to corroborate that the drones are real and that it is ET tech. Let's be nice and maybe Isaac will reveal all of those other pages!!!!!!! Isaac is real, the documents and photos are real.... ET is real.

But, if the appendage on the Big Basin drone is an atom smasher of some sort, what are the implications there? It also looks kinda like some kind of weapon. OR -- like I guessed before, it might be a larger version of the antigravity device. The drones could be hovering around as anti gravity devices keeping all of the discs in the air that are flying around.
« Last Edit: Jul 11th, 2007, 7:05pm by castles4me » User IP Logged

LangLee
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #1109 on: Jul 11th, 2007, 7:09pm »

I wonder what's on those pages everyday, and I hope he releases more very soon.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76  ...  110 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls