Board Logo
« #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK ISAAC »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jul 24th, 2017, 09:40am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30  ...  110 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK ISAAC  (Read 11411 times)
castles4me
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #405 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 1:08pm »

on Jul 6th, 2007, 12:21pm, MarkM wrote:
This road may lead to our mysterious S1 technology:

Google "Ubiquitous Computing"

http://sandbox.xerox.com/ubicomp/


to RoH:
What is your take on thishuh
User IP Logged

jugement
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 910
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #406 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 1:19pm »

on Jul 5th, 2007, 10:59am, castles4me wrote:
This will be my weirdest post yet.... but bear with me. Last night I awoke at 2:30 am. It was raining outside and I heard the beating of the raindrops but also a more steady rhythmic beating sound. Could have been hail hitting the window, but it was more rhythmic. By the time I became conscious the sound was gone. But immediately in my half asleep half awake state ethereal images went into my head and I saw a disc ufo turned upside down so I could see the underneath circle. Weird images went through my mind -- then I started "hearing" words. I say hearing but it wasn't audible. I just got the words in my head and I HAD to grab a piece of paper and write them all down.

Mind you... I am NOT a scientist. I am very spiritual and intuitive but I am just a regular person. Although I have a very high IQ (135) I did not go to college, and did not take college leve algebra or geometry classes, nor have I studied that field ( had to work, got married etc.) -- I do not know the meaning of almost all of the following words I heard, nor have I really ever heard of them or seen them. Take it for what you will.... call my crazy.... or maybe some of you scientists can figure this out.

(I will list them in order in yellow-- in case that means something) -- I have googled all of them to figure out what they mean --

Co-angular theorem math, geometry, also used in isotropic and orthotropic cylindars researched in hypersonic static ability of aerial flight.

Coaxial Integers math used in microwave and electromagnetic theory

Pythagorean Theorem geometry, three sides of a right triangle

Isosceles Inversion inversion is a geometric transformation (and something about non-expanding mapping?)

(Note -- two different website where I searched for info on the above words both gave me references to Euclidean geometry -- the study of the relationships between angles and distances in space.)

Interplanetary Alignment (self explanatory, I knew what that meant -- planets aligning)

General ASCII (heard of Ascii before of course, but..) ASCII codes represent text in computers, communications equipment, and other devices that work with text. Most modern character encodings — which support many more characters — have a historical basis in ASCII.

Disembodied Protegenes (yes this is how I wrote it down -- when I googled that the first site that came up is:
http://www.usyd.edu.au/baroquescience/Papers/ChenMorris_Keplers_pictorial_language.doc
Which describes Kepler's language - long and kind of weird article, but this sentence and much more was there: Their attempt was to reshuffle the new pictorial means (such as perspective) in order to form a scientific language, constituted from visible signs, that not only represent human knowledge and the physical world, but could also affect physical processes. This really reminds me of the description Isaac gave of the Linguistics

Binary Interdisciplinary Protocal computational algebraic software

Computational Matrixes matrix is linear algebra, study of linear transformation between two vector spaces, and I saw it on one website describing new techno called light-based computing -- visible light frequencies are used as computational surrogates for values in computational platform

Norwegian Infrared Technologies (yes this is what I "heard" and wrote it down lol) Infrared technology in Norway started at the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment (FFI) in the 1960s, and has since then spread to universities, other research institutes and industry. FFI has a large, integrated IR activity that includes research and development in IR detectors, optics design, optical coatings, advanced dewar design, modelling/simulation of IR scenes, and image analysis. Part of the integrated activity is a laboratory for more basic research in materials science and semiconductor physics, in which thin films of CdHgTe are grown by molecular beam epitaxy and processed into IR detectors by various techniques. FFI also has a lot of experience in research and development of tunable infrared lasers for various applications. Norwegian industrial activities include production of infrared homing anti-ship missiles, laser rangefinders, various infrared gas sensors, hyperspectral cameras, and fiberoptic sensor systems for structural health monitoring and offshore oil well diagnostics.

YES... weird post..... did I have a clue as to what any of that meant before I researched it this am?? NO. In fact, I was shocked that anything that I wrote down was actually something real. Not only was it all real, it is all correlated. This may or may not be related to the drones/and or Isaac, it could be just for the discoidal UFO's in general... either way, let me know what you think.
hi all;first off ,castles4me, dont feel crazy at all. their has been three of us that has had dreams. et will make you think you are halucinnating they play tricks as well as the hoaxters yet on a very higher scale. so speak your mind.drdil in that dream your name came up last night as well. Iwanted to find what castkes4me wrote before I wrote any thing down,I just got back in the house from back massage. IT was hard geting back to sleep last night they was still around. they seem to be two types of greys one of which was angry, drdil that picture you have on your forum name is the is the one that comunicated what I wrote inthe early mornin. I wrote about those being when I lived in georgia their color is brown they hang around for a while once they come into your present. IT is like they are courious and they always stau behind you . while yo are awake they never give you no messages they just watch what you do like a little child , they get right in your face while you are sleep. now hear this if they dont want you to reavel something, you will not be able to tell it you my hold it in for a long time or perhaps you my think you are crazy , you may become confuse ect, one of the things that I know thay control is that they can make you forget and they want let it come out right just like travis walton, he was not acting like that on his own they have the ablity to control our will.I have not read the two messages that some one sent and I got about 9 emails . I have no reason to lie I will not try to bust my brain to tell you what I know to be true.oh one more final thing I have been wanting to tell you all , this my come true and it my not after the dream I had of the strage craft about alittle over ayear ago, when those crafts land their will be humanoid beings they are tall they looked old i did not see any young people , quote their leader said I am the leader their where crowds of people the crafts was no more than 3 to 4feet off the ground hovering , it was like the lady was teling me that was they way that the first wave would be introduced to the public an old man came off the craft as well the others sated on board yet I got the since that they could see every thing going on as well as hear, thats the best I can tell you on that. I can tell you much more on when I am sleep and when I am wide awake. next time.I dont want to lose contac with them, they come as they please. wink
User IP Logged

Free Will Does Exist But Only When It Is Used To Break Out Of Malevolent Disagreeable ,Bad HABits THat Have Been Developed IN LIFE.
Dontdenyme
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 8
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #407 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 1:31pm »

Apologies if it was posted before but come on how important is it?

There is an employee that works/used to work for the Palo Alto Research Center that has a big interest in UFO's and CONSPIRACY.

He claims to know that PARC has UFO technology and have been using it from the Roswell crash site. Here is an employee that has a real interest in the subject and you can look at it two ways:

1. He knows information from the time Isaac was employed there, Isaac's claims based from the 80's that have bled off and other employees have heard about it through word of mouth, the timeline difference in my opinion is not an issue here.

OR:

2. This is our hoaxer, he is obviously an intelligent chap and thought he would string us along with an incredibly elaborate hoax. It is a subject that obviously fascinates him and he has the means to carry it off. I can't believe this was discussed before but not pursued, it's REALLY important in my eyes. Either way, did anyone investigate this line when it was first spotted??
User IP Logged

jlc767
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar



AIM
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 113
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #408 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 1:41pm »

2 is not likely.

1. he's an enthusiast

2. he's an Associate Professor now.
User IP Logged

WatchingWaiting
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 75
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #409 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 1:42pm »

Isaac stated

"One of the best examples of the power of the tech sector was Xerox PARC, a research center in Palo Alto, CA. XPARC was responsible for some of the major milestones in the history of computing. While I never had the privilege of working there myself I did know many of the people who did and I can say that they were among the brightest engineers I ever knew."

Isaac never worked at XPARC.
User IP Logged

beenieweenie
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 46
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #410 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 1:46pm »

on Jul 6th, 2007, 12:56pm, isawaufooverparis wrote:
Why did he erased it from his new CV if it's a joke ?


Part of me thinks he is not the one who erased it - if so, why would he not update the page? (it still says he works there)

Also, his personal webpage still has it.

http://www.kedwards.com/life.html


eta: never mind - I was looking at the wrong thing - my bad!
« Last Edit: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:01pm by beenieweenie » User IP Logged

Student
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 19
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #411 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 1:49pm »

I googled "ARPA XEROX antigravity holographic projection" after reading the article on ubiquitous computing and found this (a coincidence, but interesting. Notice what they say about "one specific wavelength of light):

March 01, 2005

Be a Predator

Now the only Predator alien tech left is one of those handy wrist gauntlets with the variable(possibly vibrating) knives and enough explosive to wipe out a Mayan civilization.
The idea of a cloak of invisibility that hides objects from view has long been confined to the more improbable reaches of science fiction. But electronic engineers have now come up with a way to make one.
Andrea Alů and Nader Engheta of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia say that a 'plasmonic cover' could render objects "nearly invisible to an observer". Their idea remains just a proposal at this stage, but it doesn't obviously violate any laws of physics.
[...]
Pendry warns, however, that the concept as it stands is "no magic cloak", because it would have to be delicately tuned to suit each different object it hides. Perhaps even more of a drawback, he points out, is the fact that a particular shield only works for one specific wavelength of light.
An object might be made invisible in red light, say, but not in multiwavelength daylight.

October 20, 2006

Scientist Make a Thing Disappear

They've come a long way since March 2005. See above…
The new work points the way for an improved version that could hide people and objects from visible light.
Conceptually, the chance of adapting the concept to visible light is good, Schurig said in a telephone interview. But, he added, "From an engineering point of view it is very challenging."
The cloaking of a cylinder from microwaves comes just five months after Schurig and colleagues published their theory that it should be possible. Their work is reported in a paper in Friday's issue of the journal Science.
"We did this work very quickly ... and that led to a cloak that is not optimal," said co-author David R. Smith, also of Duke. "We know how to make a much better one."
The first working cloak was in only two dimensions and did cast a small shadow, Smith said. The next step is to go for three dimensions and to eliminate any shadow.
Viewers can see things because objects scatter the light that strikes them, reflecting some of it back to the eye.
"The cloak reduces both an object's reflection and its shadow, either of which would enable its detection," Smith said.
The cloak is made of metamaterials, which are mixtures of metal and circuit board materials such as ceramic, Teflon or fiber composite.
In an ideal situation, the cloak and the item it is hiding would be invisible. An observer would see whatever is beyond them, with no evidence the cloaked item exists.

http://www.groonk.net/blog/mt-archives/cat_technology.php


User IP Logged

castles4me
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #412 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:02pm »

on Jul 6th, 2007, 1:49pm, Student wrote:
I googled "ARPA XEROX antigravity holographic Pendry warns, however, that the concept as it stands is "no magic cloak", because it would have to be delicately tuned to suit each different object it hides. Perhaps even more of a drawback, he points out, is the fact that a particular shield only works for one specific wavelength of light.
An object might be made invisible in red light, say, but not in multiwavelength daylight.


very good research Student..... we were really picking apart this type of topic before, but not too many articles posted about it THANKS.... and what I thought was so interesting is it is a confirmation from what I surmised from the discussions..... that the invisibility only works in one kind of light... hence its an optical illusion as we are looking at it through the light spectrum..... but cameras can pick them up (which is why so many UFO's get on film by accident) and I also think we could have special glasses to see the invisible if we are no longer looking in the same light frequency.
User IP Logged

Fencesitter
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 57
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #413 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:08pm »

on Jul 6th, 2007, 02:20am, Farmboy wrote:
Next to hard ware evidence, Math evidence might be the key to Isaac's credibility. It will be very hard to dream up the math, and pretty easy to tell if they actually worked to an end point or even a mid-solution.


Very smart - some new math or a physics theorem that doesn't exist in the body of human knowledge would *really* be a smoking gun. Certainly this technology Isaac is presenting is based on a more intricate understanding of nature than we currently have, and goal number 1 of the extraction project is clearly understanding the theory of the device. He would have been privy to exactly this sort of information.

That said, the technology and capabilities he has already presented hold a lot of water when considered against some of the most common recurring phenomena reported in UFO sightings...

For example: if we extrapolate the capabilities of the A1 device for instance, generating multiple arbitrary gravity fields would allow a craft to accelerate at a near limitless rate while completely dampening the affects of inertia on the components or passengers inside. This would handily explain the speed/acceleration capabilities reported by so many UFO witnesses. Additionally, the impermeable gravity 'bubble' would protect a craft from atmospheric drag that would typically present practical limits to travel velocity within the atmosphere. It all fits together and makes intuitive sense. If he's making this stuff up, he's one smart cookie.

I'm still trying to wrap my brain around the RSR phenomenon, but like I mentioned in the first paragraph, Isaac explaining the physics behind this (in a useful, quantitative way) would certainly give credence to his story.
User IP Logged

urantia606
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 354
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #414 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:39pm »

"We have been building versions of the infrastructure-to-come at PARC for the past four years, in the form of inch-, foot-, and yard-sized computers we call Tabs, Pads, and Boards. Our prototypes have sometimes succeeded, but more often failed to be invisible. From what we have learned, we are now exploring some new directions for ubicomp, including the famous "dangling string" display."

The above quote is the sort of thing Keith Edwards worked on. Notice the word 'invisible'.

This is where the computer screen can be anywhere in the room and is not visible. Even the keyboard can be projected onto a flat surface. No keyboard is used at all. All you see is a keyboard projected onto your desk. You may have seen these.

Holography comes to mind also.

« Last Edit: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:42pm by urantia606 » User IP Logged

Farmboy
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 108
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #415 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:40pm »

on Jul 6th, 2007, 11:50am, hjdelight wrote:
latitude wrote:

Here we go again.

Why is it so hard to stay focused? Is it because no new info has come in the last couple of weeks? So what do we do? We start grasping for anything that is no relation to the subject at hand. Get real people. Don't lose touch with your reasoning. This is how the Transformers connection started.
HJ


Totally agree about keeping focused, but think of the great advancement in vocabulary the crew has self-acquired. THis will allow for rapid evaluation/understanding of the next ISAAC release. lol (my new forumist lingo).
« Last Edit: Jul 6th, 2007, 4:36pm by oljack666 » User IP Logged

WT
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 41
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #416 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:44pm »

The ISAAC software by Novak is written in Lisp language. Clementine has some roots in the Lisp and Prolog languages
http://www.poplog.org/talk/1999/msg00136.html
and is used for predictive analytics
http://www.spss.com/clementine/index.htm
using Artificial Intelligence neural networks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poplog

Could one use Clementine to understand our ISAAC diagrams?
User IP Logged

Fencesitter
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 57
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #417 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 2:47pm »

on Jul 6th, 2007, 2:40pm, Farmboy wrote:
[...] This will allow for rapid evaluation/understanding of the next ISAAC release. lol (my new forumist lingo).


Lets hope the next ISAAC releases don't follow The Matrix pattern... #1 is great, makes you think... #2 stops you from thinking ... #3 is so bad you wish you *couldn't* think wink
User IP Logged

dhq
Guest
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #418 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 3:51pm »

Hello everybody! I rarely post on message boards But I got upset because Im amazed at how many people Chad/Isaac have taken for a ride.

Yes, its a hoax and a sloppy one at that! I first caught wind of it simply by reading the text of the faked documents. "C.A.R.E.T"? Give me a break this insults my intelligence. The DoD has nothing better to do but to "extract" technology from alien devices simply to make commercial pipeline gauges (pigs) that sometimes do not even work well? The reason I say this is because some on this message board beleive the DoD may have taken out a patent for it. Actually, if you go back and read the text (if some of you mental giants even cared to read) the black device is claimed to be an anti-gravity device which modern phisycs says is impossible. The text also says nothing useful that coud be verified, only superficial remarks regarding the outer structure of the device. Any person who has experience writing and with document structure will easily see the documents as second rate.

I have also had an expert who works in the manufacturing of pipeline devices look at the pictures, and yep, its a dressed up pipeline gauge. How many of you on this board are experts in this field?

As to the posters who claim that there are similarities but neverheless are different devices, did it ever occur to you that the reason for this is do to the fact that they are different models of pipeline pigs? Or different manufaures? A Honda and a Toyata have similarities but are different, nevertheless, they are still cars. Hello people, wake up!

In this site you'll find more pics of pipeline pigs:WWW.PPSA-ONLINE.COM.ABOUT-PIGS.PHP

Some are already looking into to see if the pipeline pig in the Isaac pics is a stolen or vandalized one.
User IP Logged

urantia606
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 354
xx Re: #2 - MYSTERY of the DRONES -SOLVED??? - ASK IS
« Reply #419 on: Jul 6th, 2007, 4:01pm »

dhq:

Sorry you have come a little late to the party. For some reason the idea of 'hit and run' comes to mind.

The pipeline pig connection was discounted quite a while back.

Yes, we're quite aware of the many different pipeline pigs.

Thanks for the input but we continue to persist.

Maybe Roswell didn't happen either. What's your take on Roswell?

« Last Edit: Jul 6th, 2007, 4:21pm by urantia606 » User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 26 27 28 29 30  ...  110 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls