Board Logo
« #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Oct 21st, 2017, 9:43pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26  ...  113 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH  (Read 3896 times)
Latitude
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 1024
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #345 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 03:19am »

I just noticed the drone photos that LMH has on her website have the copyright tags on them, ie "Image (c) 2007 by Chad" and "Image (c) 2007 by Ty B.". Can someone tell me what the purpose of this would be? How can an anonymous person claim copyright?
User IP Logged

My Drone Video
CentralScrutinizer
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

I am Central Scrutinizer, of Borg.


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 75
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #346 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 03:30am »

For anyone who's interested.... I just put up the final edited version of the teaser/trailer for the new project I'm working on entitled "ONE"....

(I was using the drones and a few others, as quick flash images, but it just didn't meld in correctly with the theme I don't think.... that trailer is still available as well..but I think this second one kinda fits better)

it's only 1 minute 19 seconds long, soooo, take a look and lemme know what ya think... just keep in mind, this is just a teaser, and I still have to get all the ideas, and how I'm gonna do the final project lined up in an orderly fashion.


here's the link for the video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEvde0SrI0U
« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 03:31am by CentralScrutinizer » User IP Logged

"If there's nothing wrong with me..... Perhaps there is something wrong with the UNIVERSE" -Dr. Beverly Crusher
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #347 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 04:03am »

on Jul 28th, 2007, 03:19am, Latitude wrote:
I just noticed the drone photos that LMH has on her website have the copyright tags on them, ie "Image (c) 2007 by Chad" and "Image (c) 2007 by Ty B.". Can someone tell me what the purpose of this would be? How can an anonymous person claim copyright?

Perhaps itís because she canít (legally) copyright her page <which she does at the bottom> without referencing her sources, be they anonymous or not.

Iím not sure if it was on her site, but Iíve seen the Rajman images copyrighted to the Flickr account which was hacked and subsequently shut down, but the copyright remained.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
OnlookerDelay
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mars is an accessible other world, with a rich history, and I believe it's hiding unbelievable secre


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 114
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #348 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 07:31am »

on Jul 28th, 2007, 02:26am, Nephilim wrote:
I think the radio show was a good one. In the crop circles discussion, a caller asked her about the strange craft/crop circle connection, and she went into it in detail, did you folks miss that?


Well certainly the crop circle news and interviews was some of the most interesting I've heard in months if not years. It just wasn't what they had my appetite whetted for. The last half hour we did have a couple of listener calls that got into the Isaac/CARET/drone story and there was a link made between the crop glyphs and Isaac document images.

Quote:
Don't be so hard on her, we don't know what happens behind the scenes concerning this professor. Don't jump to conclusions. smiley


True, we don't know what happens behind the scenes, but I think we deserved a mention of the originally hyped, feature interview and that it was either scratched, or scheduled for a later program.

Near the start of the program (about 6 minutes in) Linda points out the new link to the updated Isaac/drone information at her webpage. Then she closes the intro to last night's program with:

"hopefully, in a future Coast, I'll be able to do more in-depth (on the Isaac/drone story), but tonight, with so much going on in crop formations and mysterious lights, I'm going to begin with July 7th, and one of the largest wheat formations in the last quarter century...."

It could be that she thinks the crop formation/mysterious lights in the UK story is bigger and more breaking than the Isaac/drone story, and it may well be. Certainly, there's more "evidence" and witnesses. The only thing I'm miffed about is why the status of the headline interview with the professor was nixed. I'll write Linda and C2C and see if I can get an answer.

« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 07:37am by OnlookerDelay » User IP Logged

inex
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 11
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #349 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 07:37am »

Hi,

If it is any use to this debate, I can reveal that I am the witness who filmed the Farnborough, Hampshire, UK, triangle of lights on Sunday, July 22nd that LMH discussed on the latest Coast to Coast radio broadcast...I have spoken with her at length on the telephone and received various e-mail correspondances from her as well and found her to be one of the most diligent and conscientious reporters that anyone could imagine.
The lengths that this lady goes to obtain evidence is quite incredible...
On one occasion I took the opportunity to ask her from one researcher to another, whether she wholeheartedly believes that the Isaac, Chad, Big Basin etc "Drone" mystery is true, or just a clever hoax as many have claimed... and she has told me that she had no doubts that it is all "real".
Unlike many other researchers in this field Linda does everything that she can to provide us with the finest ufo information.
User IP Logged

OnlookerDelay
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mars is an accessible other world, with a rich history, and I believe it's hiding unbelievable secre


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 114
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #350 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 07:46am »

Thanks for that report inex... that helps a lot. I have met Linda personally myself and found her to be very commited to her work. The group assembled here has been pretty much fixated on the Isaac/CARET/drone story for the last 6 weeks, or so, and I know I'm guilty of not seeing the forest for the trees as a result. It's only now beginning to sink in just how big these events in the Farnborough/Hampshire area have been, not to mention the crop formations and the properties of the the wheat inside the formations.

There had to be an almost surrealistic atmosphere associated with what you witnessed, filmed and experienced... I truly envy you! I've seen one "green fireball" in my life, and that's been the extent of my UFO experience. It wasn't all that much to hang my hat on, but even that had me really contemplating things after I saw it. There's nothing in my experience before or after that's even close to touching it in strangeness, and it pales in comparison to what you saw!
« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 07:48am by OnlookerDelay » User IP Logged

HopefulSkeptic
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 30
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #351 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:08am »

Well it was great to hear some more from Isaac. Though I have to say I'm disappointed that he mostly wrote an essay on computer history instead of telling us more hard information on what everyone really wants to know about. I think we'll have to take a "wait and see" approach.

I would imagine that Big Basin and other drone sighting areas have been crawling with people with cameras day and night for the past month. I wonder why no one has gotten anything?

As for the crop circle in England, the bright flash and the immediate EMF which disrupted the video recording sounds very much to me like the typical effects of a nearby lightning strike. Could lightning possibly create crop circles? Hmmm.

Whether EMF will affect a given video recorder depends on the shielding of the electronics, position to the bolt, whether the bolt hits something metallic, and a great number of factors. Here's a close lightning strike that doesn't seem to affect the recording, as an example (some strong language)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djZo00FeYcQ

CentralScrutinizer, nice job on the video teaser. It shows a lot of promise. Keep up the good work and I hope you finish your project soon.

nekitamo mentioned the vocoder, which is one of those things that you'll have to hear and see in action to understand it. Think of the song Funkytown, or the voices of cylons in Battlestar Galactica. Check this out to hear and see one in action

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqvvNcvenU

Thanks for reading.
User IP Logged

pvtjoker75
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 61
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #352 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:12am »

i'm downloading last nights c2c show. If anyone is interested, i can try to upload later today
User IP Logged

MarkM
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #353 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:16am »

While we may all feel some disappointment that the intended interview got nixed last night, and more time wasn't spent on the drones, let me reiterate once again a very important point -

We shouldn't think for one minute that the rising tide of ET related events is not in some way linked. I think this was also a point that LMH touched on several times throughout the program. The most obvious connection being the similarity between some of the crop circle designs and the Isaac symbols (signals, boy, I can't say that enough). If they are programs, then it's not only the mysterious drones that are being programmed, but spaceship Earth as well.

Everyone is probably tired of me saying this, but I'll take the risk of repeating myself (drag in that dead horse smiley) this is all heading towards something major. LMH touched on the feeling that many people have regarding this possibility, specifically the "sense" shared by those involved in the abduction phenomenon. This underlying current of "knowing" is something that we discussed in here just the other night and which several members could relate to. As LMH noted - you are not imagining this and you are not alone!

Taking everything into consideration, this would be a good time to step back a bit and think about what all of these unprecedented events mean.

We are on the front lines, friends - right here, right now.
« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:21am by MarkM » User IP Logged

oljack666
Guest
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #354 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:32am »

To read the "issues" that Linda Moulton-Howe emailed to Isaac go to the following address.
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1292&category=Environment

My point on "these issues" that she called them are as follows.

I see something here with the Isaac emails that really rings a bell with me since I go through some of the same things.

There is nothing worse then having someone tell you that you are a liar or are fabricating a story when in all actuality what you are stating is the truth. Have you ever been accused falsely of something you did not do and instead it now overshadows the truth for other readers of said material.

MISTAKE NUMBER ONE
Quote:
I emailed these issues to Isaac and on June 27, 2007, I received his replies in two separate emails indicated by receipt times, which Isaac gave me permission to share in an Earthfiles follow-up.

Well, I think that LMH's choice of "critic" emails to Isaac was tremendously improper and unsavory. You don't go in with an attack mode certainly but in doing so, he experienced those same feelings that some of us have experienced before and he's turned off now.

Mark knows, it happened to him here in the forum a little while back. I certainly know because I have time and time again removed posts of mine where someone has requested to hear some of my experiences and then suddenly after a lot of work on my part they say something like, "well I find it hard to believe".

WHEN YOU KNOW SOMETHING TO BE TRUE, and you have comments like what Isaac had thrown at him - right out of the gate, he's done with us because I know I'm done with all of those who ever asked me about my experiences and I know Mark is done with the one who attempted to destroy his character. In other words, we would never have anything to do with them again except defend our stance. Isaac defended his stance as have I, as has Mark, but you only do that once to make your final point and you're done with them.

If Isaac is telling the truth, I believe that LMH messed up righteously. Consequently, I doubt he'll make any attempts to return except to give us the whole nine yards. But on that note, if he is telling the truth, he's also thinking - they're not worth knowing the truth.

I do not find the "critics" below to be anything more then a smarta**.

First Critic
Quote:
"Looking at the so-called 'documentation'"
"DID NOT EXIST IN 1985"
I state now and for the RECORD that this whole thing is "a HOAX"

Second Critic
Quote:
"This is a big hoax."
"the US Government would NEVER allow this information to left in the hands of some worker."
"the manual does not look anything like a legal NASA"
" pictures of the 'artifact' are photoshopped"
"I can tell you that the aliens DO not label every single part"
"photos of the drone on the floor are model parts"
"configuration of all the drones sent in to you and others is something the aliens would never design"
"All their ships are based on the use of space"
"history of 'probes' from EBE's they are SMALL and fast"
"I am surprised that you and George Noory etc. are easily tricked by this"
"After looking at all of the fancy 'documents,' including the Macromedia Freehand or Adobe Illustrator-designed 'alien diagrams"

So what was Isaac's emotional response to those kind words? What in the hey was she thinking? These emails really did nothing but called the man a liar.

Big mistake on LMH's part to display such idiotic comments to Isaac if she was expecting him to reply at all. Sure, he replied because he had to defend that part of it.

MISTAKE NUMBER TWO
Isaac was treated exactly how Mr. Smith in Birmingham, Alabama was treated, which is why he disappeared from her sight.

MISTAKE NUMBER THREE?
Now consider this. What about Ty and Stephen. What emails from the "critics" did she mail them? Dang!
.
« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:49am by oljack666 » User IP Logged

oljack666
Guest
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #355 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:33am »

From: Isaac
Subject: Re: "Drones"
Date: June 27, 2007 Received 1:34 PM, Albuquerque, New Mexico
To: earthfiles@earthfiles.com

Isaac: "There are a few misconceptions that I have noticed so far and would like to clear them up, and will also answer your questions:

1) I realize now that I did not make this clear, but I should clarify that I am not responsible for the blacking out of the Q4-86 report. Most of the copies I was able to make came from documents that were already archived, which meant that they had already been censored for use by outside parties that needed access to some, but not all, of CARET's information. I'm trying to share this information, not hide it, but if I did feel that if a given topic was too sensitive for some reason, I would make it clear that I had personally covered it up and probably try to give a reason why.

2) I do not understand the question about why the diagram would be "formatted for 8.5 x 11"... As I mention in my letter, the diagram is a reproduction, not the original. We had a team of technical artists painstakingly copy the diagram from its original source, which was a slightly curved panel not unlike the one seen in the Big Basin craft, although this one was apparently inside the craft, not on the outside. We copied it into a drafting program over the course of about a month.

Our software was understandably primitive by today's standards, but it was still orders of magnitude more powerful than a pencil and paper would have been. This made a task that would have otherwise been nearly impossible relatively feasible, albeit extremely time-consuming. I can assure you, "they" did not make anything particularly convenient for us. One of the reasons we chose to reproduce that particular diagram was because out of all the diagram-artifacts we had access to, it was on the flattest surface.

Since the geometry of the forms is extremely important, curvature of the surface it's printed on must be "corrected" if it is to be reproduced in a surface with a different contour (such as a flat page). This can be done in a number of ways, by either using a mathematical model to reverse the effect of the surface curves on the diagram's shapes, or by methods of physical measuring that allow precise measuring of irregular surfaces. In either case, however, it adds a significant new dimension of labor to an already extremely labor-intensive task, so it's avoided whenever possible. We really just needed one or two accurately copied diagrams to serve as convenient examples for our own work in decoding and reproducing it, so luckily this was not something we had to do often. Some experimentation was being done on ways to "scan" the diagrams as well, using an almost completely automated process that could automatically account for curved surfaces, but during my time there, very little progress was made on this front.

3) I think the confusion over the quality of the documents stems from the fact that he (critic) is under the impression they (CARET document) were typeset. They were not. First of all, I'm no guru when it comes to graphics or design, but being in close contact with numerous people from places like XPARC will give you enough background to know the lay of the land. What's first important to note is that systems capable of desktop publishing had been in development for many years before CARET, mostly starting with the Xerox Alto (in 1973), which XPARC developed themselves.

In fact, I once remember hearing from someone related to the original Alto team that Boeing (I believe) used the Alto to lay out and print the documentation for one of their planes (or something to that effect, I heard the story years ago). The joke was apparently that there was so MUCH documentation that the plane itself could essentially be filled with the pages. Furthermore, laser printing itself had also been around for many years (albeit in an extremely expensive form), and was also developed within XPARC (more or less). Other systems, such as PERQ and Lilith, also came out around the late 70's and while none of them turned into major commercial products, they were not uncommon among large companies and [mostly] universities and were put to very productive use.

These systems were also the inspiration for the Apple Lisa and Macintosh, which was of course perhaps the biggest factor in the consumer-level desktop publishing boom of the late 80's and early 90's. By 1984, there were quite a few options available for producing these kinds of documents, they were just ABSURDLY expensive, so they weren't on every street corner. Obviously it was nowhere near as turnkey and simple as it is today, but it was a very crude approximation of the same process with similar tools. We just had far less features and everything was a hell of a lot slower. But the point I'm trying to make is that while our method of documentation was somewhat advanced for its time, and also somewhat uncommon, it was hardly unattainable by a sufficiently motivated, financed, and well-connected organization.

I had very little contact with the technical writers for the most part, but I do know that we were using this kind of technology for both page layout and printing. CARET was expected to produce a massive amount of detailed, well-formatted documentation that could be easily modified and re-used for numerous drafts and revisions, and we would not have been able to keep up using traditional page layout and typesetting techniques. The mid-1980's were a very transitional period for these fields, and I would suggest that people do not assume we were using run-of-the-mill standards.

One of the things I appreciated most about CARET was that if the technology was available, and we needed it to work better or more effectively, it was given to us with little debate. But typesetting and digital page layout are apples and oranges, so I think most of this is a moot point anyway.

The bottom line is that many people both inside and outside the engineering world frequently underestimate how long we've had a lot of the technology we have. 99% of the algorithms we use today were developed decades ago, they just didn't have the same practical applications immediately available. Most of the engineers of the 60's and 70's would have been right at home with today's developments and technologies. The only difference is that things have gotten smaller and faster. In the vast majority of technologies, that is the only thing that REALLY changes from one era to the next. If I told the average person that we had speech-synthesizing technology in 1936, they probably wouldn't believe me.

I could show you a prototype of a simple drafting/design system that was operated by a light pen directly on a screen from the 1960's. You could draw a shape freehand, then immediately rotate it, modify it, duplicate it, or whatever. You could draw lines connecting different objects, then erase them by simply drawing a squiggly line over it. The computer could interpret the squiggles as a sign to erase something, all in real time. And this was half a century ago, and decades before CARET. Think about that for a moment. The point is, most of what we have today is much older than we think. The only differences are that it's faster, cheaper, and a marketing team has given it a glossy finish and found a commercial application for it. But if you take away some of the speed, power, ubiquity and consumer appeal, you'll find a lot of today's technology scattered throughout much of the 20th century. I hope this is helpful.
Isaac"


Continued.........................
.
« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:34am by oljack666 » User IP Logged

oljack666
Guest
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #356 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:33am »

From: Isaac
Subject: Re: "Drones"
Date: June 27, 2007 Received 4:28 PM, Albuquerque, New Mexico
To: earthfiles@earthfiles.com

Isaac: "1) While I wasn't a major player in the (CARET) organization, I was hardly 'some worker.' My middle-management position is the only reason I was able to make out with what I did. Bear in mind that even someone in my position would never get the chance to leave with even the smallest of actual artifacts, but paperwork smuggling was feasible for anyone who wasn't subjected to the frisking.

Also, let's not forget that paperwork only proves so much. I'll be the first to agree that everything I've provided could be faked, I suppose. It is, after all, just a series of images. While the powers that be obviously don't want this material leaking if they can help it, they're certainly aware that scans of documents aren't in the same league as UFOs landing on the White House lawn. I'm not the first person to leak a document or a photo, and I won't be the last. The information I've shared is very unlikely to change the world, and this is the reason I'm not worried about being literally murdered if I'm identified. I'll face consequences to be sure, but it's not the kind of thing they kill for.

2) Of course the manual doesn't look anything like typical government and military documents. The entire purpose of CARET was to recreate the look and feel of silicon valley private enterprise, populate it with private industry engineers, and let it tackle the problem of extraterrestrial technology research. Style manuals were among the numerous things we brought with us from the 'outside world.' I'm not sure what else can be said about this. I agree it's uncommon for non-standard documents to come out of this kind of research, but it's even more uncommon for people like myself (and even more so for many of my co-workers) to be brought into this kind of project in the first place. Most of us were decidedly not military men. I find it a lot more bizarre than the fact that we were able to design our reports a certain way. CARET was an exception to many of the usual rules.

3) If he (one of many critics who emailed Earthfiles and which I shared with Isaac) believes the pictures are fake, I certainly can't do or say anything to prove otherwise. He sounds very sure of himself.

4) Most importantly, be very wary of anyone who claims to 'know the mind' of extraterrestrials. The comments he's made are, to put it lightly, naive and extremely presumptuous. Firstly, he's referring to 'the aliens' as if there is a single collective group of them. The universe is not split into 'humans' and 'non-humans,' any more than Earth is split up into 'Spanish' and 'non-Spanish' or something equally arbitrary. There are numerous races - and again, like our own races of humans here on earth, they do things in very different ways.

His comment that 'the aliens don't do this or that' is akin to saying 'humans don't speak Japanese.' Well, many humans don't, but Japanese humans certainly do. The point is not that his statement is right or wrong, but simply that it's phrased illogically. He then goes on to suggest that the design of the drones is wasting space, which is again, alarming in its arrogance. We had some of the brightest minds in the world spending years just to understand a single facet of their technology, while this individual claims to be able to assess basically every detail of a given design after looking at a single photo and conclude that it's inefficient. I'm not even sure such a statement should be dignified with a response, and I'm sure you can understand why.

To be honest, whoever this person is, I wrote him off as soon as he said 'the aliens would never design as these pictures depict.' That's about as presumptuous (if not ignorant) as a statement on this subject can be, at least coming from a fellow human. Unless there's an alien engineer on the other side of this email, there's simply no way such statements could have merit. I'm really only writing this as a courtesy to you.

At best, he's been exposed to technology from a radically different race, and at worst, he doesn't know what he's talking about. This individual may have access to real information, and he might not. If he is a fellow 'whistle blower,' then I'm not interested in attacking him. If he's not, and is simply making things up, then I'm even less interested. Whatever he is or isn't is not for me to say, but judging by the way he talks about this issue I have my doubts.

It's a big world and these are complicated issues. A sense of humility and the admission we don't know everything is one of our greatest assets.

Isaac"
« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:34am by oljack666 » User IP Logged

urantia606
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 354
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #357 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:50am »

In defence of LMH, she may have wanted Isaac to silence the critics once and for all. Now she can moved on to other issues with him.

Also, and this is important, Isaac was listening to the program last night.....therefore LMH was very careful what she said about her other contacts. I'm sure she doesn't want to spook him any more than he already is. She has to play her hand very carefully with Isaac. I'm sure she would love to have Isaac talk on the phone but he's just not ready to do that.

Just my thoughts and ATO you make some very good points also.

User IP Logged

MarkM
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #358 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:52am »

Just to clarify what ATO is referring to here - an individual came over from another forum and, without bothering to check his information (or PM me to ask) assumed that because my nickname is "MarkM" that I was someone he knew. This wasn't the case and once my actual identity was confirmed the individual apologized. Case closed.

I guess I'm not as convinced that LMH has burned any bridges with Isaac, although I do agree that LMH could have handled her first encounters with him in a more diplomatic way. Assuming, as we do, that Isaac has been following the drama in the forums then I'm sure he's gotten a good dose of the criticism that's out there!

Judging from the replies by individuals such as Saladfingers (the prolific CGI artist) on the OM thread, Isaac's emails fell on deaf ears. Something I'm sure he anticipated. I think his comments were aimed more at helping the fencesitters to better understand things.

I'll go out on a limb and predict that we'll see some new info in the next week or so.
User IP Logged

oljack666
Guest
xx Re: #4 THE DRONE ENIGMA A GLOBAL SEARCH FOR THE T
« Reply #359 on: Jul 28th, 2007, 09:54am »

on Jul 28th, 2007, 09:50am, urantia606 wrote:
In defence of LMH, she may have wanted Isaac to silence the critics once and for all. Now she can moved on to other issues with him.

Also, and this is important, Isaac was listening to the program last night.....therefore LMH was very careful what she said about her other contacts. I'm sure she doesn't want to spook him any more than he already is. She has to play her hand very carefully with Isaac. I'm sure she would love to have Isaac talk on the phone but he's just not ready to do that.

Just my thoughts and ATO you make some very good points also.


She doesn't know what she's doing Urantia. She's only presenting a story but she has had no idea of the research that has been going over the past month or what to even look at and consider.

I know this because of what sits on the top of her website address today. It's something WE knew all along and was confirmed when she sent YOU the email with Tys high-resolution photo.

http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1292&category=Environment

She had the darn high-resolution pictures over a month ago and she had all of that time to see for herself that the linguistic primers were there all along but said nothing?!

It wasn't until WE showed her what it was that SHE was sitting on all of this time, did she THEN provide it in her website as if it were HER find.

07-21-07 High Resolution Photographs of Big Basin Craft
http://www.ufocasebook.com/bigbasinhighres.html

Those high-resolution pictures meant nothing to her and we didn't know this - well, not until now.
.
« Last Edit: Jul 28th, 2007, 12:05pm by oljack666 » User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26  ...  113 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls