Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Oct 22nd, 2017, 10:23am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 97 98 99 100  Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 61688 times)
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1470 on: Feb 15th, 2010, 8:58pm »

Many are making these claims, but you use the term expert. I have no knowledge as to their expertise. It follows that since the drones are an obvious fake their decorative symbols must be part of that fake. Unlike others here I do not dictate what you should believe.
User IP Logged

Stoohoopid
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1471 on: Feb 15th, 2010, 9:40pm »

Sorry OI made two original posts and the other was on one of the videos on youtube. I did say they were real or created by a genius.
User IP Logged

fear fear nothing else.
Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1472 on: Feb 16th, 2010, 07:58am »

on Feb 15th, 2010, 8:58pm, Icarus99 wrote:
It follows that since the drones are an obvious fake their decorative symbols must be part of that fake.

I don't know. One could be "throwing the baby out with the washwater" thinking like that. grin
User IP Logged

orbit
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 411
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1473 on: Feb 16th, 2010, 11:46am »

When someone claims something is fake, it's a good idea to find out why they say its fake and who it is doing the faking.
The recent revelations about MI5 paying hoaxers to create crop circles proves this. It draws ones attention away from a legitimate subject and tars it all with the hoaxers brush. Information is often given as a means of creating the thought of disinformation.

Just food for thought.
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1474 on: Feb 16th, 2010, 3:07pm »

on Feb 15th, 2010, 8:07pm, Icarus99 wrote:
The drones were a poorly executed hoax.


Not poorly executed. Just exposed for what it is. It fooled alot of people including the DRT. Their search to find positive evidence of a drone reality lead to the realization that the only positive evidence was that which pointed at hoax.
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1475 on: Feb 16th, 2010, 6:00pm »

Quote:
I don't know. One could be "throwing the baby out with the washwater" thinking like that.


Maybe that is the plan. To exit and fight again another day having learned a valuable lesson while making sure any real info is swept away by the researchers. Of course the just plain hoax answer seems to be valid and is the one I choose, but who am I to know. If the hoaxer ever strikes again surely all the information provided here and at other sites will be carefully considered unless the hoaxer was a total fool. I guess we will just have to wait and see and after all who will really care.
« Last Edit: Feb 17th, 2010, 2:10pm by masker33 » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1476 on: Feb 16th, 2010, 9:08pm »

masker, have you thought about going into politics wink
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1477 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 2:09pm »

Politics, the natural habitat for liars and fools and manipulation. Also I have no faith I could be elected, do you!
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1478 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 4:22pm »

on Feb 17th, 2010, 2:09pm, Icarus99 wrote:
Politics, the natural habitat for liars and fools and manipulation. Also I have no faith I could be elected, do you!


I don't see why not, you seem to know a whole lot a people.. wink only problem is you ain't no fool.. cool
« Last Edit: Feb 17th, 2010, 4:25pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1479 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 4:28pm »

on Feb 17th, 2010, 2:09pm, Icarus99 wrote:
Politics, the natural habitat for liars and fools and manipulation. Also I have no faith I could be elected, do you!

on Feb 17th, 2010, 4:22pm, tomi01uk wrote:
I don't see why not, you seem to know a whole lot a people.. wink only problem is you ain't no fool.. cool

Hi Tomi!! grin

It’s not what you know and it’s not who you know,

It’s what you can make others believe you know…..

Cheers. kiss
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1480 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 4:54pm »

Lets sum up the situation:
The California Drones are produced by someone and appear on the internet. Along comes the LAP and Isaac. Next The Alabama/ Georgia drone appears and is quickly determined an inferior fake by an egotistical wannabe. This person seems to become carried away by the acceptance of the story by a noted UFO celebrity and continues to play along. Later a blog appears and a lot of drone illustrations including the so called"thumper image"which UFOCB had received with no explanation as I remember. Later the blog explained that this image was a fake. Now, as we speed forward, The DRT finds the Alabama Drone is actually the Georgia Drone and so ends all belief in any possibility of the Drone being real. It would therefore seem that this portion of the saga is quite finished. This is the way I see it.
« Last Edit: Feb 17th, 2010, 5:39pm by masker33 » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1481 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 5:20pm »

on Feb 17th, 2010, 4:54pm, Icarus99 wrote:
Lets sum up the situation:
It would therefore seem that this portion of the saga is quite finished. This is the way I see it.


grin grin grin grin grin
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1482 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 5:26pm »

on Feb 17th, 2010, 4:54pm, Icarus99 wrote:
Lets sum up the situation:
The California Drones are produced by someone and appear on the internet. Along comes the LAP and Isaac. Next The Alabama/ Georgia drone appears and is quickly determined an inferior fake produced by an egotistical wannabe. This person seems to become carried away by the acceptance of the story by a noted UFO celebrity and continues to play along. Later a blog appears and a lot of drone illustrations including the so called"thumper image"which UFOCB had received with no explanation as I remember. Later the blog explained that this image was a fake. Now, as we speed forward, The DRT finds the Alabama Drone is actually the Georgia Drone and so ends all belief in any possibility of the Drone being real. It would therefore seem that this portion of the saga is quite finished. This is the way I see it.

Some need to know who and why.
What about that little Alabama drone's light center and past hints of the BB drone being real and the trees fake.
How can this saga ever end when little tidbits have been tossed out for consumption around the forums. These things can't now suddenly be taken back and expect people to forget about them. In a game you can do that but everyone agrees to the rules first. grin
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1483 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 5:33pm »

on Feb 17th, 2010, 4:54pm, Icarus99 wrote:
<snip>

Next The Alabama/ Georgia drone appears and is quickly determined an inferior fake produced by an egotistical wannabe. This person seems to become carried away by the acceptance of the story by a noted UFO celebrity and continues to play along.

<snip>

Hi Masker grin,

I think you may have mistakenly and inadvertently added the word, “produced” to your earlier post…..

Cheers!! kiss
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #1484 on: Feb 17th, 2010, 5:35pm »

Quote:
Some need to know who and why.
What about that little Alabama drone's light center and past hints of the BB drone being real and the trees fake.
How can this saga ever end when little tidbits have been tossed out for consumption around the forums. These things can't now suddenly be taken back and expect people to forget about them. In a game you can do that but everyone agrees to the rules first.


Lies and fabrication to continue the charade is the answer. A desperate attempt at the expansion of fifteen minutes of fame. Of course things could be different and someone might be using this site to learn other actions and other endeavors, but that is just a thought.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 97 98 99 100  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls