Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Oct 18th, 2017, 10:46pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 61019 times)
Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #165 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 7:45pm »

The CARET Detectives: An Investigational Report
will probably be available on youtube shortly after the event. I'm sure somebody will be videotaping. For some reason, I'm intrigued. Curious as to how its going to be presented.....as an investigation that failed? One that lasted a really long time and found nothing but photo locations?.....Or have they been sitting on something juicy for a while, waiting for the conference?

Strong evidence exists that point to a hoax (False locations, false testimony, anonymous sources, and analysis that shows a considerable amount of photo anomalies). What can they possibly present to suggest a real event happened? Are they even going to try that approach? Should be interesting to say the least.
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #166 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 7:53pm »

Something tells me it's going to be a lot like what is described here:

http://www.ufowatchdog.com/ufoexpo2.html

I dunno, call it a hunch. wink
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #167 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 7:59pm »

Sigh...
Looks like it worked again
Cute YouTube vids and jpeggies
Deflection at it's best
Gotta give her credit but my god, it's getting old
You can't even remember the topic anymore
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #168 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 8:07pm »

on Sep 29th, 2009, 7:53pm, Double Nought Spy wrote:
Something tells me it's going to be a lot like what is described here:

http://www.ufowatchdog.com/ufoexpo2.html

I dunno, call it a hunch. wink


Wow. Interesting read. Thanks for the link! A different perpective on a UFO conference. The very last sentence and image summed it up nicely:

"They have 'the truth', and it can be yours...and they will be more than happy to provide you with it...for a price, of course..."

User Image
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #169 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 8:23pm »

on Sep 29th, 2009, 7:45pm, Jeddyhi wrote:
The CARET Detectives: An Investigational Report
will probably be available on youtube shortly after the event. I'm sure somebody will be videotaping. For some reason, I'm intrigued. Curious as to how its going to be presented.....as an investigation that failed? One that lasted a really long time and found nothing but photo locations?.....Or have they been sitting on something juicy for a while, waiting for the conference?

Strong evidence exists that point to a hoax (False locations, false testimony, anonymous sources, and analysis that shows a considerable amount of photo anomalies). What can they possibly present to suggest a real event happened? Are they even going to try that approach? Should be interesting to say the least.


Yep should be interesting none the less...Will it be the truth or are they going to ride in on a horse thats a little gassy......
User IP Logged

Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #170 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 8:33pm »

on Sep 29th, 2009, 8:23pm, Radi wrote:
Yep should be interesting none the less...Will it be the truth or are they going to ride in on a horse thats a little gassy......

My prediction is that there will be no conclusion. A "To be continued" , "to be continued", for years to come.
It will go down as inconclusive in history and be accepted as real by the gullible over time.
In 2067 it will be regarded as Roswell with all kinds of people coming out of the woodwork.
What a sorry state.
User IP Logged

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #171 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 8:49pm »

on Sep 29th, 2009, 8:33pm, StaffLetter666 wrote:
My prediction is that there will be no conclusion. A "To be continued" , "to be continued", for years to come.
It will go down as inconclusive in history and be accepted as real by the gullible over time.
In 2067 it will be regarded as Roswell with all kinds of people coming out of the woodwork.
What a sorry state.


Absolutely correct!! Just as tomi, LMH and the DRT wish!

There is not a snowballs chance in hell these PIs, with their vast network of skills for finding revenue streams, kill their golden calf in the name of truth!


« Last Edit: Sep 29th, 2009, 8:54pm by TheShadow » User IP Logged

blackwater
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 104
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #172 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 10:49pm »

What does it take to kill a ufo/alien hoax?

Has it ever been done?

I mean look at Dr. Jonathan Reed, all of that info has been up on ufowatchdog for years, but he's still on the lecture circuit. It's totally ridiculous that he's able to give presentations and not get laughed out of the room.
User IP Logged

let 'em call ya anything but late for a meal time.
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #173 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 11:24pm »

Excellent point, Blackwater. That example and the frauds it represents bother me a lot, too. Curiously, some good sightings (or at least plausible ones) have been killed off, sometimes by ufologists themselves. I think the difference is largely one of whether there is someone milking it or not.

Lots of dairy activity going on in this one, and the mission statement clearly says something like "to keep this mummified beast producing cash by whatever means are available." The behavior and the dogged persistence of the pawns in this case go far beyond what one would expect to find in anyone other than the most rabid, deluded nutcase. Pawns working effectively as a team are generally not crazy.
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Undercover0ne
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #174 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 11:36pm »

The drone saga was funded by LMH. Created by people she hired.

The PI's are funded by LMH, maybe even friends or related to LMH.

The drones were created for LMH to display on C2C, and to promote on Earthfiles. She wanted more payed subscribers to her content.

She never expected to ever come to a conclusion, and planned on making more and more content to help boost interest and subscribers over a period of time. Fake witnesses, fake sightings, and fake documents. All created by LMH and her hired crew under an NDA. That is why she still provides links to isaaccaret.fortunecity.com on a lot of her crop circle content, and other places.

LMH is using the PI's to create more interest, and is the one making them show up at UFO conferences to make even more money off them.

LMH has ties to people in the media, that is how the PI's got on the news.

LHM is also a member of the DRT forum, and talks on these and other forums in a bad disguise.

Who: LHM and her hired graphics team.
Why: To create a mystery she could promote and sell to subscribers.


We have been watching from day One.

Game Over
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #175 on: Sep 29th, 2009, 11:54pm »

on Sep 29th, 2009, 11:36pm, Undercover0ne wrote:
The drone saga was funded by LMH. Created by people she hired.

The PI's are funded by LMH, maybe even friends or related to LMH.

The drones were created for LMH to display on C2C, and to promote on Earthfiles. She wanted more payed subscribers to her content.

She never expected to ever come to a conclusion, and planned on making more and more content to help boost interest and subscribers over a period of time. Fake witnesses, fake sightings, and fake documents. All created by LMH and her hired crew under an NDA. That is why she still provides links to isaaccaret.fortunecity.com on a lot of her crop circle content, and other places.

LMH is using the PI's to create more interest, and is the one making them show up at UFO conferences to make even more money off them.

LMH has ties to people in the media, that is how the PI's got on the news.

LHM is also a member of the DRT forum, and talks on these and other forums in a bad disguise.

Who: LHM and her hired graphics team.
Why: To create a mystery she could promote and sell to subscribers.


We have been watching from day One.

Game Over


Interesting theory. I'm looking forward to seeing what you have to back it up. You have taken in a lot of territory there, so I'd better plan the time for a lot of reading.

Oh dear, it's way past my bedtime.
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Luvey
UFO Casebook Staff

member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 840
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #176 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 12:26am »

I have never gotten into the drones because after the first few weeks into it, my instincts told me it was a hoax. I usually listen to my instincts…. Well try to anyway.
But, I have often wondered about why anyone would create such a hoax in the first place. What did run through my mind was if someone wanted to write a book what better way to do that than start a hoax and get ideas from what is posted. You have to admit that many clever minds have offered ideas, especially in the months when it all started. All the person would need to do is think on the ideas presented and build stories around it…..
Many movies I have watched lately have had things woven into them that have been posted on Casebook, and other sites.
To give an example there is a movie coming out soon called “The Fourth Kind” that used information researched from Casebook articles. http://www.thefourthkind.net/

Luvey
User IP Logged

~ "When you master your mind, you master your life." ~

~ In every action there is an equal and opposite reaction ~
Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #177 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 06:37am »

on Sep 29th, 2009, 11:36pm, Undercover0ne wrote:
The drone saga was funded by LMH. Created by people she hired.

The PI's are funded by LMH, maybe even friends or related to LMH.

The drones were created for LMH to display on C2C, and to promote on Earthfiles. She wanted more payed subscribers to her content.

She never expected to ever come to a conclusion, and planned on making more and more content to help boost interest and subscribers over a period of time. Fake witnesses, fake sightings, and fake documents. All created by LMH and her hired crew under an NDA. That is why she still provides links to isaaccaret.fortunecity.com on a lot of her crop circle content, and other places.

LMH is using the PI's to create more interest, and is the one making them show up at UFO conferences to make even more money off them.

LMH has ties to people in the media, that is how the PI's got on the news.

LHM is also a member of the DRT forum, and talks on these and other forums in a bad disguise.

Who: LHM and her hired graphics team.
Why: To create a mystery she could promote and sell to subscribers.


We have been watching from day One.

Game Over


In my opinion, LMH, Whitley Streiber, and C2C are all in collusion and are possibly behind the drone hoax. Ever since Whitley had the gall to claim he witnessed a drone, I have suspected the trio above as being the drone hoax team. Create a hoax to create subscribers, generate web page hits, more listeners, and revenue. It really is all about the money for some people. LMH even charges just to view her website content. Not every Ufologist is out for the truth, some are simply out for the money!

User Image

If they aren't the creators of the hoax, they are at least propagators of the hoax....knowingly using a hoax to their own benefit.
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 07:08am by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #178 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 07:02am »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 06:37am, Jeddyhi wrote:
In my opinion, LMH, Whitley Streiber, and C2C are all in collusion and are behind the drone hoax. Ever since Whitley had the gall to claim he witnesseed a drone, I have suspected the trio above as being the drone hoax team. Create a hoax to create subscribers, generate web page hits, more listeners, and revenue. It really is all about the money for some people. LMH even charges just to view her website content. Not every Ufologist is out for the truth, some are simply out for the money!

User Image


Also IMHO...PTB need not do much with people like this in the UFO field. Disclosure will never happen because of people like this. They make a laughing stock out of the field and are the number one reason why it will never happen....Think "World Weekly News"....
Also why this subject will never be taken seriously are these people that are only there for the money and just taken advantage of those that are gullible.....

Yep remember that Whit and LMH always advertise for each other..So this is was just more advertising for each other...Dr. Reyes? Don't forget to read his dream log since 2001 where he dreams and is a big fan of Whit........ laugh grin
Hmm wonder who LMH is posing as....Lev..hehe

I always use the LEGAL backdoor to read her site..:>wink laugh
No need to pay and it does not matter anyway since she always has nothing worth paying on there for anyway..
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 07:08am by Radi » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #179 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 08:58am »

"I keep six honest serving men
They taught me all I knew:
Their names are What and Why and When
And How and Where and Who."
(Rudyard Kipling.)
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls