Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 25th, 2017, 03:38am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 36112 times)
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #240 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:05pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 4:59pm, Double Nought Spy wrote:
Someone would have to pay me a lot of money to act that stupid. Just sayin'.


I was just thinking... You gotta be getting your money from somewhere.. wink lipsrsealed
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #241 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:06pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 4:58pm, tomi01uk wrote:
How do you know that's not going on, with the resources and time allowed?

I donít Tomi and have never claimed to, Iím merely basing my comments on what you stated as you evidently know more than us about what LMH does with her time, and of course it's purely my opinion based on their public actions to date. Although I will add that C2C has been infinitely more accommodating to me personally than LMH ever has (before I posted any critiques of her, belly-laughing aside).

But allow me to rephrase, what I was trying to say is that it certainly doesnít inspire confidence.

Better?
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #242 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:09pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:05pm, tomi01uk wrote:
I was just thinking... You gotta be getting your money from somewhere.. wink lipsrsealed


But, see, I get paid for being a smart-@ss, which is far, far less embarrassing.
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #243 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:09pm »

This is getting so silly.
Like the other Doc (the one who speaks latin) and his newest theory that the drones could be a hoax in 3D because they don't exist in 3D only 4D.
Everyone is going bonkers entertaining any of these diversions and twisting of logic.
User IP Logged

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #244 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:09pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:09pm, Double Nought Spy wrote:
But, see, I get paid for being a smart-@ss, which is far, far less embarrassing.


... and an intelligent one at that!!!!
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #245 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:10pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:09pm, Double Nought Spy wrote:
But, see, I get paid for being a smart-@ss, which is far, far less embarrassing.

Take any further bickering to PM's, this is the last warning.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #246 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:27pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:10pm, DrDil wrote:
Take any further bickering to PM's, this is the last warning.


Fair enough. Since LMH isn't here (as far as we know) and Isaac and Chad and Raj and the others don't exist, I will endeavor to keep my unflattering comments directed at the defenseless and the fictitious. grin
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #247 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:28pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:09pm, StaffLetter666 wrote:
This is getting so silly.
Like the other Doc (the one who speaks latin) and his newest theory that the drones could be a hoax in 3D because they don't exist in 3D only 4D.
Everyone is going bonkers entertaining any of these diversions and twisting of logic.


Kind of evolution, I guess. rolleyes
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #248 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:42pm »

on Sep 29th, 2009, 11:36pm, Undercover0ne wrote:
The drone saga was funded by LMH. Created by people she hired.

The PI's are funded by LMH, maybe even friends or related to LMH.

The drones were created for LMH to display on C2C, and to promote on Earthfiles. She wanted more payed subscribers to her content.

She never expected to ever come to a conclusion, and planned on making more and more content to help boost interest and subscribers over a period of time. Fake witnesses, fake sightings, and fake documents. All created by LMH and her hired crew under an NDA. That is why she still provides links to isaaccaret.fortunecity.com on a lot of her crop circle content, and other places.

LMH is using the PI's to create more interest, and is the one making them show up at UFO conferences to make even more money off them.

LMH has ties to people in the media, that is how the PI's got on the news.

LHM is also a member of the DRT forum, and talks on these and other forums in a bad disguise.

Who: LHM and her hired graphics team.
Why: To create a mystery she could promote and sell to subscribers.


We have been watching from day One.

Game Over


Is it just me, or is this a very intriguing post? I saw it late last night, when I should have been sleeping, but I've read it a few times now and it seems to make a great deal of sense. Really, the only thing I can find that doesn't quite fit is this: I don't think of LMH as being competent enough to pull this off. But then she obviously had some talented help, and I'm biased anyway. Well, the "bad disguise" isn't so convincing, either. Of course we have seen plenty of bad disguises here, but why would LMH post on any of these forums. Talk about a bad trip!

Is LMH rich enough to still be paying PIs and lackeys?
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #249 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:42pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 4:37pm, DrDil wrote:
ďA computer line designed after itĒ?

All of these examples pre-date the Drones and I agree that the LAP was an inspired combination and subsequent representation of them (intentionally, subconsciously or otherwise), but unique?



Yes, the LAP was for legal purposes a "creative work".

Quote:
Anyway when considering the above then would/does/could even intellectual copyright be argued?



Absolutely as an "original creative work".

Quote:
I.e. when already waived and there has been no one willing to be identified and weíre now past the two year mark?



Yes, that's why it wouldn't be a "slam dunk". The LAP has been put into the public domain and left there uncontested. One also needs to register it in the Library of Congress before asserting legal claims to the right. But intent to defend must also be proven within this specified period of time.

Quote:
But back to your original question about the design thing, as Masker has pointed out then a couple of prints on the INTERNAL board components are the only difference from the earlier designs, isnít it? Well, apart from a vague screen-shot on the desktop on the main page for the desktops (note, NOT notebooks).



If the person or group who did the LAP wanted to excercise their rights the entire production and distribution worldwide of these computers would be halted. Every single distributor holding these computers in stock would be sued concurrently with the manufacturer. The defense of such issues would amount to a tremendous amount of money, considering the loses in sales and and the adverse publicity.

Anyone with the nouse to do the LAP knows this. I'm sure.

« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:44pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #250 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:44pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 4:46pm, tomi01uk wrote:
It's a theory. Just a theory. But certainly more plausible than thinking little ol LMH was behind this..
LOL as if she doesn't already have a life too full to even look at the internet half the time... to see how frustrated everyone is about this. It is off her radar.



With all due respect, that statement is misnomer of sorts. LMH, C2C, Whitley Streiber and many others have a big interest in their websites and the internet as a whole since there are so many Ufology related forums and websites these days.

Her plate maybe full, but I'm sure a hefty portion of it is dedicated to her website (and the internet) which generates revenue. A lot of these names like LMH and Whitley are making their money around Ufology. They want the money first, then truth or disclosure or whatever else later. That is a simple fact of truth. They write books not to give away for free, but to sell. They do the lecture circuit, not to enlighten us for free but in order to get paid. They attempt to increase the size of the 'tin foil hat' crowd because that means fresh fans willing to believe whatever they read regarding Ufology. And they are willing to pay to read it.

LMH, Streiber, etc.....they do not impress me. They promote their ideas and theories to make a buck, not to find truth.

For them, it will always be about the almighty dollar first, truth second. If you think othewise, your just fooling yourself.

User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #251 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:48pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:44pm, Jeddyhi wrote:
If you think othewise, your just fooling yourself.



I know LMH doesn't have time to browse the internet to the point of paying attention to posts and sentiments from ppl like us.
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #252 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:49pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:42pm, tomi01uk wrote:
If the person or group who did the LAP wanted to excercise their rights the entire production and distribution worldwide of these computers would be halted. Every single distributor holding these computers in stock would be sued concurrently with the manufacturer. The defense of such issues would amount to a tremendous amount of money, considering the loses in sales and and the adverse publicity.

Anyone with the nouse to do the LAP knows this. I'm sure.



Well then, that points more to Alienware being the origin of the LAP than anything else. Surely they would not take such a risk unless they had the right. But this is all deja vue and has been discussed many times over.

Why travel in a circle?
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #253 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:49pm »

Well put, Jed. LMH, C2C and Strieber all live on the internet. Their web sites are their places of business as much as a building with a good location is where a pharmacist does business.
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #254 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 5:50pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 5:48pm, tomi01uk wrote:
I know LMH doesn't have time to browse the internet to the point of paying attention to posts and sentiments from ppl like us.


And why is she to busy? She is busy making money from Ufology, correct?
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls