Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 24th, 2017, 4:24pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 67821 times)
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #270 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:31pm »

A copyright would expose the hoaxers so I suppose a legal claim would as well. Be it a company or individual.

Next, yes, LMH has co-operated with the PI's as 11th has said already in his posts. If 11th said it, it is closer to home than if I say it, so why are you bugging me about ithuh
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #271 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:31pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:18pm, TheShadow wrote:
Regardless of what she may tell you tomi......LMH is a businesswoman and as a businesswomen she has to troll around the web (forums included) to stay abreast of whats happening in her field and see what the competition is up to.

To believe anything else is simply foolish!

Iím not so sure Shads, sure she may pay others to do it (but I doubt it) for her or mine her subscribers and online associates into informing her, albeit inadvertently on their behalf. But I honestly think that not only does she not have the time I believe she neither has the inclination to even pretend to care about what people who are interested in the topics she writes about actually think of what she writes/sells.

Letís face it, what could she possibly reference at Earthfiles that would warrant a link to any online forums considering that any forum that discusses the Drones in any detail will inevitably house a higher than average percentage of people who are aware of LMH & her Drone-dealings?

(Talk about counter-productive!! laugh)

Cheers.

(What colour IS your office Shads?)
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #272 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:34pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:18pm, TheShadow wrote:
Regardless of what she may tell you tomi......LMH is a businesswoman and as a businesswomen she has to troll around the web (forums included) to stay abreast of whats happening in her field and see what the competition is up to.

To believe anything else is simply foolish!


Not to the degree you would think, does she really care what Shads or doc or me think.. She has people who are friends who keep her appraised of things, but there is a very big world out there outside of this little spec. And revenues to LMH is not why she does what she does with such fervor in as many areas as she engages in. She loves her work and she tries to do her best.
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #273 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:38pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:31pm, DrDil wrote:
Iím not so sure Shads, sure she may pay others to do it (but I doubt it) for her or mine her subscribers and online associates into informing her, albeit inadvertently on their behalf.

Right on cue.... grin

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:34pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Not to the degree you would think, does she really care what Shads or doc or me think.. She has people who are friends who keep her appraised of things,

This tag-team thing is working just like you said it would Tomi!! undecided laugh

User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #274 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:38pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:16pm, DrDil wrote:
Anybody with the 'nouse' must also know that waiving copyright and posting anonymously on a free (and for all intents and purposes anonymous) website with no copyright claims or assertions for 27+ months isn't halting the production of anything?



There would have to be a statue of limitations put aside for the fact that copyright registration was late. Once that was completed however, all hell would break loose smiley

« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:39pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #275 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:44pm »

I haven't seen so many lawyers in one place since... well never mind. grin
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #276 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:45pm »

Quote:
The paperwork and appeals (or as you said because thereís no 'slam-dunk') would inevitably make the case one of compensation rather than retraction?



Retraction? Never suggested it ! Compensation (settlement) surely though..

Quote:
And for all you credit the hoaxers with do you really think they could have foreseen this?



IMO yes. The sophistication employed in this... yes absolutely.

However, we don't know the complications behind its release and there may be the achilles heel.

And as you said, there was no way of anticipating such usage by a computer company in their mass media advertising and production blitz either.

Time, circumstances and profit may still drive human endeavor in this after all.. Two years tho.. I would be checking Library of Congress for registrations of anything "alien" laugh

User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #277 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:49pm »

Quote:
As you say theyíre obviously bright and have a strong background in computers and arguably UFO history, would they risk (possibly) their personal & family life by publicly admitting to a hoax such as this?

Hoax=Deception=Liar?

Would that look good on a resume or CV?



OMG.... first of all... who ever did this is beyond being a "designer", the group behind this is showing no profit motive whatsoever so far..

But if they settled with Dell, errors and ommissions insurance would kick in. They would never have to work again.

Next, Dell would probably hire them in a crush of competition from other companies wanting not designers, but storyboard editors at the very least.
IMO
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #278 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:53pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:49pm, tomi01uk wrote:
OMG.... first of all... who ever did this is beyond being a "designer", the group behind this is showing no profit motive whatsoever so far..

But if they settled with Dell, errors and ommissions insurance would kick in. They would never have to work again.

Next, Dell would probably hire them in a crush of competition from other companies wanting not designers, but storyboard editors at the very least.
IMO


Just because it fooled you, that doesn't mean it is work of any great accomplishment. In fact, all the real CGI artists who looked at it said it looked crappy to them. Well, there was that one guy, but he's hardly above reproach.
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #279 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:54pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:34pm, tomi01uk wrote:
And revenues to LMH is not why she does what she does with such fervor in as many areas as she engages in. She loves her work and she tries to do her best.


Please tell me you are kidding!!! Does her best?? Best to do what? Sensationalize nonsense! Next you are going to claim she only seeks and reports the truth!!

OH PUL-LEASE!!!!
User IP Logged

Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #280 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:55pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:49pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Next, Dell would probably hire them in a crush of competition from other companies wanting not designers, but storyboard editors at the very least.
IMO

Give me a break.
What is Dell going to use these clowns for?
Buyers of PC's and IT don't want this nonsense.
They want low cost, performance and service.
They certainly won't get trust or confidence.
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #281 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:56pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:53pm, Double Nought Spy wrote:
Just because it fooled you, that doesn't mean it is work of any great accomplishment. In fact, all the real CGI artists who looked at it said it looked crappy to them. Well, there was that one guy, but he's hardly above reproach.


Please do not use your transparent tactics of ad hominems and diversion from the topic.

The topic is that there is a big motivation now for any creator of the LAP to come forward for compensation of commercial usage of that design.
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #282 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:57pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:56pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Please do not use your transparent tactics of ad hominems and diversion from the topic.

The topic is that there is a big motivation now for any creator of the LAP to come forward for compensation of commercial usage of that design.


That's just BS. You are trying to inflate the importance of the artwork. Somebody here is transparent in their motives and tactics. rolleyes
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 7:00pm by Double Nought Spy » User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #283 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:57pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:55pm, StaffLetter666 wrote:
Give me a break.
What is Dell going to use these clowns for?
Buyers of PC's and IT don't want this nonsense.
They want low cost, performance and service.
They certainly won't get trust or confidence.


Are you saying then that the people who created this "hoax" as you like to simplify it, are unemployable?
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #284 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 6:59pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 6:57pm, Double Nought Spy wrote:
That's just BS.


I am telling you what could be done right now by the creators of the LAP. And asking why they are not doing this?

If you want to try to figure how much to claim in a lawsuit, I would certainly think that a muliple of millions would not be out of the ball park. Because the whole identity of that line and their marketing is now built on almost exact replication of the LAP.
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 7:02pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls