Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Aug 21st, 2017, 8:43pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 50807 times)
Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #315 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:44pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 7:40pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Do you even know the procedure for filing a copyright with the Library of Congress and what that entails the owner? Look it up before supposing common sense prevails over common law grin

You are under some impression the owner filed for copyright?
Wrong.
Knowing or not knowing the procedure is immaterial.
When faced with contadictions, questionable motives, unique circumstances, renegning on abandonment of ownership, etc. Occam's Razor and common sense often comes into play with legal or civil judgements. That is fact.
That Razor cuts in many places.
You seem not to understand that.
It's a mine(d)field.
There will never be any legit lawsuits nor settlements.
The hoaxers have no case unless they try to sue themselves.
Now that would be a hoot.


User IP Logged

donkeykong
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 35
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #316 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:44pm »

You guys really need to step awaaay from the drones.

Leave them be. Everything has been said, several times over and has become cyclical. I don't know why either side carry it on anymore.

If it is hoaxed, then everyone leaving it alone for a few years might take the pressure off someone wanting to admit to it all. Or not, but you'll never know.

Anyway, that's all. Hope all of you are well.

Kris
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #317 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:47pm »

Anyway, my only point here is that there is enough financial motive for those, he or she, who MAY be human and created the LAP to get a great deal of compensation from AlienWare for copyright infringement.

Now why hasn't anyone? That's all I ask..
User IP Logged

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #318 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:50pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:47pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Anyway, my only point here is that there is enough financial motive for those, he or she, who MAY be human and created the LAP to get a great deal of compensation from AlienWare for copyright infringement.

Now why hasn't anyone? That's all I ask..


The likely and most probable scenerios have been explained to you thoroughly!! One of what proceeded is the reason. Pick one and choose a new line of distraction.
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:51pm by TheShadow » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #319 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:52pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:50pm, TheShadow wrote:
All possible scenerios have been explained to you thoroughly!! One of what proceeded is the reason. Pick one and choose a new line of distraction.


Sorry, I missed any answer that makes sense..
What would prevent you from making a claim for copyright infringement in such a substancial case as this?
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #320 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:53pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:47pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Anyway, my only point here is that there is enough financial motive for those, he or she, who MAY be human and created the LAP to get a great deal of compensation from AlienWare for copyright infringement.

Now why hasn't anyone? That's all I ask..


What part of "Because they would expose themselves as the hoaxers" are you having trouble comprehending?
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #321 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:54pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:47pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Anyway, my only point here is that there is enough financial motive for those, he or she, who MAY be human and created the LAP to get a great deal of compensation from AlienWare for copyright infringement.

Now why hasn't anyone? That's all I ask..

They don't have the $$?
Fear of ridicule?
Money ain't everything?
They have a life?
Don't really care anymore?
Don't want to be put under a microscope?
Don't know how to pursue?
Have tried and were advised against it.
Don't have backing to pay lawyers?
And so on and so on ......

Lot's of reasons really.

I think you read too much into it as supporting it could be real.
User IP Logged

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #322 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:54pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:52pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Sorry, I missed any answer that makes sense..
What would prevent you from making a claim for copyright infringement in such a substancial case as this?


BECAUSE it is not a substantial case!! It is a HOAX!! To be a substantial case it must be somewhat factual in nature!!!
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #323 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:55pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:53pm, Double Nought Spy wrote:
What part of "Because they would expose themselves as the hoaxers" are you having trouble comprehending?


Like this is really going to keep them awake at night while they are living in the Virgin Islands on their yachts.. grin

Bad bad hoaxers !! no no no!
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #324 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:57pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:55pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Like this is really going to keep them awake at night while they are living in the Virgin Islands on their yachts.. grin

Bad bad hoaxers !! no no no!


I'm sorry, I must have too many windows open on my machine. I keep thinking I'm back in reality. Carry on with your little fantasy. It obviously brings you a lot of pleasure.
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #325 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:57pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:54pm, TheShadow wrote:
BECAUSE it is not a substantial case!! It is a HOAX!! To be a substantial case it must be somewhat factual in nature!!!


Ummm... it's later in the night here than there I assume and I'm wondering what are you thinking?

AlienWare now building the entire personna of a line of computers and its marketing on the LAP is not substancial? hmmmmm wonder what is then rolleyes
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 8:57pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #326 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 9:01pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:57pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Ummm... it's later in the night here than there I assume and I'm wondering what are you thinking?

AlienWare now building the entire personna of a line of computers and its marketing on the LAP is not substancial? hmmmmm wonder what is then rolleyes


Means one of 3 things.

Either Alienware created or was involved in creating the drones and LAP and therefore own them.

Or they found and cut a deal with the hoaxers.

Option 3 Their lawyers are really stupid


« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 9:02pm by TheShadow » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #327 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 9:08pm »

How much value the claim is depends on to what degree the use of that copyright material has on the market and to what degree it was used (violated) for profit. This is where the jury will figure in the most, because violation will have already been established in previous extensive legal tests from prior cases in copyright law.

No company wants to get to this point. By the time they do the product will have dried up in the market.
A copyright violation has the ability to request customs to seize the property at the point of transit into the USA.

edit to add: This is why, earlier, when AlienWare was just using a little of the LAP in the case design I thought it not significant enough to overcome the public domain aspect, but now, they are going full hog and I suspect that puts them right where a NY law firm would be interested....
« Last Edit: Sep 30th, 2009, 9:12pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #328 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 9:11pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 8:57pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Ummm... it's later in the night here than there I assume and I'm wondering what are you thinking?

AlienWare now building the entire personna of a line of computers and its marketing on the LAP is not substancial? hmmmmm wonder what is then rolleyes


Do you really seriously think anyone is buying one of their products because of the LAP connection?
User IP Logged

Sheepdog
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 39
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #329 on: Sep 30th, 2009, 9:16pm »

on Sep 30th, 2009, 9:08pm, tomi01uk wrote:
edit to add: This is why, earlier, when AlienWare was just using a little of the LAP in the case design I thought it not significant enough to overcome the public domain aspect, but now, they are going full hog and I suspect that puts them right where a NY law firm would be interested....

Now we have a NY law firm searching for hoaxers to bring a suit.
My God.
It gets more unbelievable by the minute.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls