Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 25th, 2017, 07:03am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 36150 times)
neveleeleven
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 227
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #495 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 7:28pm »

So while Tomi continues to make a fool of herself by comparing a 10+ year old FC logo with a 2 year old UFO hoax, how about some more comedy?

Did any of you see LMH and Earthfiles make complete fools of themselves by hosting another hoax?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread506330/pg1

Someone used an iPhone application that allows you to add UFO's to your pictures, and then sent the picture to Earthfiles claiming it is real. Earthfiles, and the original "witness" (a liar), still claim it is real after an exact match was found.

LMH and Earthfiles are a threat to UFOlogy..... Complete fools.

laugh





User IP Logged

Romans 12:6
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #496 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 7:42pm »

Yep, you're right. My wrong:

http://web.archive.org/web/20001203131700/http://fortunecity.com/

User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #497 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 7:48pm »

LMH doesn't lend any authenticity or credibility to the field of UFOlogy. In my opinion, her early endorsement of the drone case as actual sightings is par for the course in regards as to what she latches onto in order to sustain viewer subscriptions. rolleyes
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #498 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 7:48pm »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:42pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Yep, you're right. My wrong:

http://web.archive.org/web/20001203131700/http://fortunecity.com/


Yes you're wrong Tomi. rolleyes How a black gear and 3 colored balls are a derivative of the LAP defies logic and even imagination. You might as well say a . or a ~ is an infringement. rolleyes
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #499 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 7:53pm »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:42pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Yep, you're right. My wrong:

http://web.archive.org/web/20001203131700/http://fortunecity.com/



That was undoubtedly the longest reach I've ever witnessed and I'm a fan of Mister Fantastic.

User Image
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #500 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 7:57pm »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:48pm, Katterfelto wrote:
Yes you're wrong Tomi. rolleyes How a black gear and 3 colored balls are a derivative of the LAP defies logic and even imagination. You might as well say a . or a ~ is an infringement. rolleyes


I wasn't the one who associated it with it, the suggestion was there on the link. My imagination did see a similiarity and still could..but it is no big deal ?
And it has nothing to do with infringement and it would be a derivative copyrightable by the creator in my opinion if he was inspired by the LAP and created this logo from that design..

But it is obvious from that page in 2001 that the gear thingy is to describe the functions of the web site..
ok.. i'm sorry... rolleyes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7mIy97_rlo
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2009, 8:01pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #501 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 8:14pm »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:42pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Yep, you're right. My wrong:



As usual!!!



User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #502 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 8:27pm »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:57pm, tomi01uk wrote:
I wasn't the one who associated it with it, the suggestion was there on the link. My imagination did see a similiarity and still could..but it is no big deal ?
And it has nothing to do with infringement and it would be a derivative copyrightable by the creator in my opinion if he was inspired by the LAP and created this logo from that design..

But it is obvious from that page in 2001 that the gear thingy is to describe the functions of the web site..
ok.. i'm sorry... rolleyes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7mIy97_rlo


Nope, you first suggested it even if you are to slow to realize it. This is why you are made fun of at times and also why you are found to be very confusing. DrDil tried to explain it to you without success.

I'll try. Here goes nothing...the logo on display at the link you provided was not what was being analyzed. The poster (T palmer) was attempting to display pg 120 from the Linguistic Analysis Primer....hence the name of the page and broken link which points to

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-lang-analysis-p120-fullsize.jpg
(The above link also does not work but leads to the logo.)


If you go back to the link you provided and right click the Fortune city logo that you mistakenly thought the post was about and look at properties for that image, the address for the image is

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/pacl-lang-analysis-p120-fullsize.jpg

Page 120 does show a three node junction. T Palmer couldn't link to it because you must view the image at the fortunecity Isaaccaret site exclusively unless you copy the image and host it somewhere else. T Palmer saw no relation between the logo and the LAP and was making no comparisons. He simply couldn't link to p120 and you thought the default logo was what he was talking about. You miscontrued it because you thought the logo was the topic, but it was not.

The fortune city logo pops up anytime you try to hot link one of their hosted images.

I will now do a hot link to page 120 to show you what happens. Right click on the image of the logo and check properties to see the address is correct but still shows the logo instead of the page 120

User Image

Basically this proves you are reaching for anything at this point and even convincing yourself that others see what you do.

The only reason I'm telling you this is because you apparently are still unaware of your actual mistake.
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2009, 8:48pm by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
neveleeleven
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 227
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #503 on: Oct 4th, 2009, 9:11pm »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:42pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Yep, you're right. My wrong:

http://web.archive.org/web/20001203131700/http://fortunecity.com/



That is the way it has always been.

The sad part is that I didn't even have to research that answer..

on Oct 4th, 2009, 8:27pm, Jeddyhi wrote:
The fortune city logo pops up anytime you try to hot link one of their hosted images.


Yes, that is because hot-linking images is a way to steal bandwidth. People would get a free fortunecity account and put their images and videos on it and then hotlink from their own web host so that the bandwidth was taken from fortunecity and not their own host.

I remember when Tomi claimed to "fix computers" for people or something.... I don't see how any type of advanced computer user could make the mistake Tomi made. Was she telling the truth?

Mistake after mistake... seems really fishy.

User IP Logged

Romans 12:6
murnut
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 614
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #504 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 12:07am »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:28pm, neveleeleven wrote:
So while Tomi continues to make a fool of herself by comparing a 10+ year old FC logo with a 2 year old UFO hoax, how about some more comedy?

Did any of you see LMH and Earthfiles make complete fools of themselves by hosting another hoax?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread506330/pg1

Someone used an iPhone application that allows you to add UFO's to your pictures, and then sent the picture to Earthfiles claiming it is real. Earthfiles, and the original "witness" (a liar), still claim it is real after an exact match was found.

LMH and Earthfiles are a threat to UFOlogy..... Complete fools.

laugh








I have to say I laughed at this...although I should not.

User IP Logged

You want a revolution?
You've got to make a difference on your own
You want a revolution?
Stand up, stand out and make it known
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #505 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 04:07am »

I was stealing a few hours away from work to search the Library of Congress records for any relevent name that could be applied to a copyright of the Isaac stuff.

A quick misinterpretation of something not terribly important and you can't let go? ...
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2009, 04:07am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #506 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 04:17am »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 9:11pm, neveleeleven wrote:
I remember when Tomi claimed to "fix computers" for people or something.... I don't see how any type of advanced computer user could make the mistake Tomi made. Was she telling the truth?




Ohhh give it a break will ya!! rolleyes

What has that got to do with quickly finding something "remotely" similiar to the LAPhuh??

User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #507 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 04:27am »

Here's the latest addition to the RRR article:

http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/10/socorro-ufo-hoax-part-2-getting-closer.html
User IP Logged

Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #508 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 05:26am »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:28pm, neveleeleven wrote:
So while Tomi continues to make a fool of herself by comparing a 10+ year old FC logo with a 2 year old UFO hoax, how about some more comedy?

Did any of you see LMH and Earthfiles make complete fools of themselves by hosting another hoax?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread506330/pg1

Someone used an iPhone application that allows you to add UFO's to your pictures, and then sent the picture to Earthfiles claiming it is real. Earthfiles, and the original "witness" (a liar), still claim it is real after an exact match was found.

LMH and Earthfiles are a threat to UFOlogy..... Complete fools.

laugh






This is funny stuff..This always shows how much research LMH puts into anything she does......Absolutely hilarious........

on Oct 5th, 2009, 04:07am, tomi01uk wrote:
A quick misinterpretation of something not terribly important and you can't let go? ...

Its a freaking gear or as some will say a cog....
No wonder you come up with the BS you do...Its all misinterpretation....Mistakes will cost you in any court room........But you should know that already..
Then this is a description of the LAP and the formula used for the design...So perhaps they should be sent a take-down notice...........grin Heres a quote..
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HolographicTerminal
Then of course this one..
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InstantRunes
Quote:
If the situation calls for tension and drama, expect them to appear in a semi circle around a character displaying various important looking bars and graphs, the techie in question will usually spout some Techno Babble while randomly typing and "flipping switches" on different terminals. Basically the futuristic, floating, glowy equivalent of an officious clipboard and pen.

If they look especially complex, it evokes a sci-fi version of Instant Runes, and is usually included as a CG effect added in later. For extra oomph, it can be paired with Matrix Raining Code either in the terminal or around the character. To make it seem even more aesthetically pleasing, may take the form of a Design Student's Orgasm.
grin
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2009, 05:48am by Radi » User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #509 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 06:32am »

on Oct 4th, 2009, 7:57pm, tomi01uk wrote:
I wasn't the one who associated it with it, the suggestion was there on the link.


Like I said, you made the association by mistaking the default FC logo for the topic being discussed. And you still haven't acknowledged the mistake or that you understand what you did wrong.

on Oct 5th, 2009, 04:07am, tomi01uk wrote:
I was stealing a few hours away from work to search the Library of Congress records for any relevent name that could be applied to a copyright of the Isaac stuff.

A quick misinterpretation of something not terribly important and you can't let go? ...


Not when this example of your self confusing logic and deflection highlights your status quo. You now claim it is unimportant, but only because you were showed your mistake....until then I imagine you thought it was pretty important.

Do you understand that T Palmer was making no comparisons, that the FC logo was not being discussed, that your imagination ran away with you?

Your own credibility has somewhat diminished after this incredibile fiasco.
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Pages: 1 ... 32 33 34 35 36  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls