Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Aug 17th, 2017, 06:35am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 50243 times)
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3950
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #525 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 08:45am »

on Oct 5th, 2009, 08:28am, Radi wrote:
Guess its not the web then..Did you log on to the internet for the first time ever when the drones came out..?
Since real experience would have shown you from the beginning what that logo represents..... laugh


Radi... give it up.. ok?? Are you married? Too personal a question and I'm sorry, but if you are or were.. never try to make sense out of the machinations of a female brain that shows temporary unchecked exuberence.. wink
User IP Logged

Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #526 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 08:52am »

on Oct 5th, 2009, 08:45am, tomi01uk wrote:
Radi... give it up.. ok?? Are you married? Too personal a question and I'm sorry, but if you are or were.. never try to make sense out of the machinations of a female brain that shows temporary unchecked exuberence.. wink


You were the one that thought the drones were real.. grin
and as it seems still try to give them some sort of reality....
You make mistakes like the previous and state things that are clearly untrue ie (FC site getting in on the act)
Then things I won't mention in the beginning of the drone saga let alone have a special place for a known liar....
But I guess this is only because you have a female brain....Quite an insult to the female brain.....
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3950
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #527 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 08:58am »

on Oct 5th, 2009, 08:52am, Radi wrote:
You were the one that thought the drones were real.. grin
and as it seems still try to give them some sort of reality....
You make mistakes like the previous and state things that are clearly untrue ie (FC site getting in on the act)
Then things I won't mention in the beginning of the drone saga let alone have a special place for a known liar....
But I guess this is only because you have a female brain....Quite an insult to the female brain.....


Funny you should be their defender !! grin grin
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2009, 09:00am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #528 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 09:04am »

on Oct 5th, 2009, 08:58am, tomi01uk wrote:
Funny you should be their defender !! grin grin
What you got on me Randi from the beginning here that is unmentionable?

Anywhere you posted... wink
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #529 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 09:35am »

I was just doing some reading last night in the archives of an old, defunct UFO list, just for the entertainment value, really. Oh there were a few interesting things in there that I don't recall ever hearing about, but mostly it was kind of a Jeraldo cartoon foodfight running melee of dingbats, flakes, mental patients and hucksters threatening lawsuits if this page wasn't removed immediately, or that slander was not retracted, and on and on. If my demands are not met, I will file suit at noon on Wednesday. Three weeks later, another angry email with nearly identical wording demanding damages, and so on. That was about the time Art Bell was suing some of his former guests and whoever else he thought had crossed him. It's funny to read that crap now. It reminded me of recent nonsense here, of course. Everybody is a lawyer all the sudden.

Tomi claims to be a high zoot IT troubleshooter (when she is not practicing law on the net) but made a rather absurd mistake. Now it is of no consequence and we are pissants for calling her on it. This crap will never end.

Speaking of never-ending crap, I see LMH has posted the perp's "response" to the revelation that his iPhone ufo is nothing but a joke, in an apparent attempt to finesse the reality of her touting an obvious fraud. She is hoping for the appearance of an "inconclusive" verdict. Sound familiar?
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #530 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 11:41am »

on Oct 5th, 2009, 09:35am, Double Nought Spy wrote:
I was just doing some reading last night in the archives of an old, defunct UFO list, just for the entertainment value, really. Oh there were a few interesting things in there that I don't recall ever hearing about, but mostly it was kind of a Jeraldo cartoon foodfight running melee of dingbats, flakes, mental patients and hucksters threatening lawsuits if this page wasn't removed immediately, or that slander was not retracted, and on and on. If my demands are not met, I will file suit at noon on Wednesday. Three weeks later, another angry email with nearly identical wording demanding damages, and so on. That was about the time Art Bell was suing some of his former guests and whoever else he thought had crossed him. It's funny to read that crap now. It reminded me of recent nonsense here, of course. Everybody is a lawyer all the sudden.

Tomi claims to be a high zoot IT troubleshooter (when she is not practicing law on the net) but made a rather absurd mistake. Now it is of no consequence and we are pissants for calling her on it. This crap will never end.

Speaking of never-ending crap, I see LMH has posted the perp's "response" to the revelation that his iPhone ufo is nothing but a joke, in an apparent attempt to finesse the reality of her touting an obvious fraud. She is hoping for the appearance of an "inconclusive" verdict. Sound familiar?

That stuff is always funny as heck...Without going into detail (you can find it if you want) there was one site that I was on where myself and others were posting evidence of a company stealing software code from others and using for their own without the correct licenses...The owner of the company and supposed programmer..Kinda big at that time watched the fourm and even posting yelling at everyone and threatening to suing the fourms and each individual that was posting...When that didn't work that president of that company started posting personal/religious/made-up stuff about people posting....He got his butt kicked in court when it came down to it......hehe.......Silly stuff that was........

Just seen that LMH thing..More silly stuff....
grin
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2009, 11:43am by Radi » User IP Logged

YourWorstNightmare
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #531 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 11:53am »

Familar is an understatement just go back to July 2008 When Torvald a real Professional commented on just this repetitive scenario..type of thing on both Tomi and Numbers..Remember what Tomi said..Anybody Mess with Numbers..messes with her

How true that is literally and figuratively.
Page 11 to be specific..So we have a yacht and tugboat expert, Computer expert, Grapahics expert, and IP Lawyer..Really giving Masker/Lev group the one with a thousand faces and IPs, Virgils and Sebastians Hot Filthy Panties and The Munsters household address. Not even halloween..but perhaps in time for it.

Torvald to Numbers
page 11
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 47
Karma: 36
Re: a new perspective
Reply #161 on Jul 28, 2008, 8:26pm
angle of drone correct. attitude of drone correct. drone mockup is simple tube. sunlight on inside is not problem. problem is great big shadow under big arm.

you obvious do no have the education or experience to properly evaluate photographs. so who is ass(ume)? you or me smart guy?

so. question is how YOU miss something so obvious smart guy?


Jul 28, 2008, 6:47pm, 10538 Aka Latitude wrote:

You don't have the angle of the drone even close to correct. Check the photo. There is no sunlight hitting the inside of the ring. For such a smart guy, how could you miss something so obvious? Or did you simply jump to a conclusion the drone must be level with the ground and perpendicular with the pole? You know what happens when you assume?
(Yeah tell us Numbers what does happen?)
torvald
Full Member
***
member is offline

Torvald to Tomi and Company (sic)



Joined: May 2008
Posts: 47
Karma: 36
Re: a new perspective
Reply #172 on Jul 28, 2008, 10:08pm
@tomi01uk: i not testy. you are uneducated in basics of perspective and analysis. you think to educate self in five minutes by clicking links on topics you think are relative but are not. your knowing of these subjects are zero. this not insult. this fact.

@endzone: i educated just fine in my field. so i do not speak english to your satisfaction? this makes me ape man? did you do perspective analysis? no. did you create test scene with correct parameters? no. so to you be quiet.

@tomi01uk and endzone: i was called ass(ume) with snide remark and i can be no upset? ok the. i no be upset. see? is easy.

@everyone: here renders of test scene. attitude of drone, scale of drone, position of sun, direction, location, blah blah blah, all correct as test model. does not matter hard shadow soft shadow only where shadow! no matter reflections bounces or gi shadow under big arm there. accept it or not i finish with this study. is plain to see hoax at least if honest and accept fact not fantasy.

torvald
Full Member
***
member is offline

God Bless Torvald..!!
We Got it we know How come they still don't..They do..But we know they do..
Thus continuing trying to enlight someone hell bent on hoaxing the public like that Reed fella at OMF did..is useless..unless you bury it in the basement somewhere..where finally someone had the good sense to do..
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2009, 12:14pm by YourWorstNightmare » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3950
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #532 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 3:54pm »

on Oct 5th, 2009, 11:53am, YourWorstNightmare wrote:
So we have a yacht and tugboat expert, Computer expert, Grapahics expert, and IP Lawyer..Really giving Masker/Lev group the one with a thousand faces and IPs, Virgils and Sebastians Hot Filthy Panties and The Munsters household address. Not even halloween..but perhaps in time for it.

..


You forgot elephant keeper.. That was my favorite .. smiley
User IP Logged

YourWorstNightmare
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #533 on: Oct 5th, 2009, 9:15pm »

A circus indeed, and even an Art Critic
and an uncanny inability to discern authorship when confronted with the facts then
User Image

User Image

User Image

User Image

User Image

User Image

Its not an isolated incident..its a repeated pattern over and over again..the record is replete with it.
« Last Edit: Oct 5th, 2009, 9:21pm by YourWorstNightmare » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3950
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #534 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 03:51am »

Ahh Sys...

If only I had enough time and patience to round up all your dopefishes.. but... thanks for the flashbacks smiley
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 04:13am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

YourWorstNightmare
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #535 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 10:48am »

Thats your comeback?
You mistake following leads in the light of day fin a case infused with deliberate dead ends like Crows websites, for all all to see and discuss versus paid investigators you hired working with you, in secrecy, that have provide nothing but cover for the principles involved. Using forums like these to promote but not disclose the true agendas, merely to promote..a mystery..While you focus keeping the attention here on yourself, I focused where each one lead to either something or nothing, their logical conclusion.That includes Tom Hall, That Pisces fellow, and countless other avenues..as the others would have as well, as anyone doing a serious inquiry would. These are two different things. If a policeman has several suspects, then you don't call his going down the list ..and crossing out leads fantasizing..
You really are mixing Apples and Orange Juice,
Unfortunate about the time...
So enjoy what little you have and, Drink up.
G'day.




« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 10:50am by YourWorstNightmare » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3950
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #536 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 11:34am »

grin grin grin grin grin

LOL You are hilarious.. seriously ...
unless you are serious, then... ummmm
you have serious problems rolleyes

edit to add: but reality is obviously not one of them.. undecided
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 11:36am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #537 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 11:55am »

Dope fish happens when one is trying to uncover what you are desperately trying to obscure. He is being kind to you with the apples-to-orange juice analogy. It's really more like bricks and basketballs.
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 11:56am by Double Nought Spy » User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #538 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 12:01pm »

The only one thats hilarious is you, tomi, for your embarrassing mistakes. Why do you come here to this thread? For what purpose? The truth? Thats hilarious in itself because you constantly attempt to obscure the truth. Find a hobby until the LV convention and give this board a break.
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3950
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #539 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 12:12pm »

Having had the experience of copyright litigation that I've had, I think that makes me more qualified than you to make an assessment of the copyright aspects of the LAP. Now, lets hear more ideas about the case and less about me, because you are barking up the wrong tree. And if you can't tell that by now.. don't elevate your reasoning skills beyond anyone else here..

User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls