Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 27th, 2017, 09:02am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 36620 times)
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #540 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 12:20pm »

Nobody is buying your blather.

User Image

Now listen carefully:

The Lap is phony. It is an artistic creation. Nobody has sued. You have no argument.
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 12:22pm by Double Nought Spy » User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Gort
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 0
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #541 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 12:30pm »

But she gets paid
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #542 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 12:44pm »

Wow...she is still harping about copyright stuff.... rolleyes
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #543 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 1:02pm »

on Oct 6th, 2009, 12:12pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Having had the experience of copyright litigation that I've had, I think that makes me more qualified than you to make an assessment of the copyright aspects of the LAP. Now, lets hear more ideas about the case and less about me, because you are barking up the wrong tree. And if you can't tell that by now.. don't elevate your reasoning skills beyond anyone else here..


IMHO
hmmm Aren't you elevating your skills above anyone elses here.....That would mean you are doing what you ask others not to do.....When no one knows what you have done..You want others to take your word for it but show nothing and are shown to be less then trueful...and always mis-interpret what others say and post..Does not sound like a valid source of information...So please tell me about Creative Commons.. How do you feel about GPL and the way its affected by Patents and copyrights and how does it pertain to Pakistan and China.....wink
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 1:18pm by Radi » User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #544 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 1:19pm »

This thread is so quiet until she shows up.....then we all post about how she makes no sense. Is she and has she been trolling us all this time? grin
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 1:20pm by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #545 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 1:27pm »

on Oct 6th, 2009, 1:19pm, Jeddyhi wrote:
This thread is so quiet until she shows up.....then we all post about how she makes no sense. Is she and has she been trolling us all this time? grin


Yep i like the phrase.."Dronie Troll"
Kinda distinguishes between the average internet troll...Which as we know are also fun to an extent...
Ruffles the feathers and gets under the skin..Unlike the Dronie Troll which is all of the above but does it to keep the talk alive of the drones even thou the conversations make no sense and have no value in any kind of form other then to keep the foucus on drones
This is what LEV was at one time but that was another level of the same thing above... wink
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 1:33pm by Radi » User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #546 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 2:24pm »

Hi, DrDil,

hope you hear me inmidest of all that noice on this party. You probably have seen that:

http://www.uforesponseteam.com/

What do you think? - I also would enjoy to read Elijah's interpretation.

And - of course - everybody's oppinion as soon as you have time to talk about anything else but Tomi. wink
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 2:26pm by SiddReader » User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #547 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 2:50pm »

Here is a Whois for the site....appears to be french owned?


WHOIS results for uforesponseteam.com

--- #YAML:1.0
# GANDI Registrar whois database for .COM, .NET, .ORG., .INFO, .BIZ, .NAME
#
# Access and use restricted pursuant to French law on personal data.
# Copy of whole or part of the data without permission from GANDI
# is strictly forbidden.
# The sole owner of a domain is the entity described in the relevant
# 'domain:' record.
# Domain ownership disputes should be settled using ICANN's Uniform Dispute
# Resolution Policy: http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp.htm
# For inquiries about 'by policy' protection, please check directly
# with the appropriate registry (Eurid, AFNIC)
#
# Acces et utilisation soumis a la legislation francaise sur
# les donnees personnelles.
# Copie de tout ou partie de la base interdite sans autorisation de GANDI.
# Le possesseur d'un domaine est l'entite decrite dans
# l'enregistrement 'domain:' correspondant.
# Un desaccord sur la possession d'un nom de domaine peut etre resolu
# en suivant la Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy de l'ICANN:
# http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp.htm
# Pour obtenir les informations en status 'Protected by policy', contactez
# directement le registre concerne (Eurid, AFNIC)
#
# 2009-10-06 19:40:45 CEST

domain: uforesponseteam.com
reg_created: 2009-05-23 23:40:49
expires: 2010-05-23 23:40:49
created: 2009-05-24 01:40:50
changed: 2009-05-24 01:40:50
transfer-prohibited: yes
ns0: a.dns.gandi.net
ns1: b.dns.gandi.net
ns2: c.dns.gandi.net
owner-c:
nic-hdl: SB5052-GANDI
organisation: ~
person: simon biasi
obfuscated: Obfuscated by Gandi
address: (Gandi) 15 place de la Nation
zipcode: (Gandi) 75011
city: (Gandi) Paris
country: (Gandi) France
phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576
email: 91d8eec10b62439ce5599339ff708ebf-962452@contact.gandi.net
lastupdated: 2009-05-24 01:38:25
admin-c:
nic-hdl: SB5052-GANDI
organisation: ~
person: simon biasi
obfuscated: Obfuscated by Gandi
address: (Gandi) 15 place de la Nation
zipcode: (Gandi) 75011
city: (Gandi) Paris
country: (Gandi) France
phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576
email: 91d8eec10b62439ce5599339ff708ebf-962452@contact.gandi.net
lastupdated: 2009-05-24 01:38:25
tech-c:
nic-hdl: SB5052-GANDI
organisation: ~
person: simon biasi
obfuscated: Obfuscated by Gandi
address: (Gandi) 15 place de la Nation
zipcode: (Gandi) 75011
city: (Gandi) Paris
country: (Gandi) France
phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576
email: 91d8eec10b62439ce5599339ff708ebf-962452@contact.gandi.net
lastupdated: 2009-05-24 01:38:25
bill-c:
nic-hdl: SB5052-GANDI
organisation: ~
person: simon biasi
obfuscated: Obfuscated by Gandi
address: (Gandi) 15 place de la Nation
zipcode: (Gandi) 75011
city: (Gandi) Paris
country: (Gandi) France
phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576
email: 91d8eec10b62439ce5599339ff708ebf-962452@contact.gandi.net
lastupdated: 2009-05-24 01:38:25



« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2009, 3:08pm by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Gort
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 0
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #548 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 2:53pm »

Lets make a video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ri-pqVlMHA&feature=player_embedded#
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #549 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 2:58pm »

Also found their blog.

http://uforesponseteam.blogspot.com/
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #550 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 3:42pm »

grin grin

"We have been in operation for nearly 3 years."

What a remarkably low profile they have had...
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #551 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 4:01pm »

grin Simon...

Here he goes:

http://younggeezer.com/

I think he wants my t-shirt design with the panda....
User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #552 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 4:20pm »

And California isn't far away:

http://www.levitatemediagroup.com/

Levitate? Funny...
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #553 on: Oct 6th, 2009, 6:51pm »

on Oct 6th, 2009, 2:24pm, SiddReader wrote:
Hi, DrDil,

hope you hear me inmidest of all that noice on this party. You probably have seen that:

http://www.uforesponseteam.com/

What do you think? - I also would enjoy to read Elijah's interpretation.

And - of course - everybody's oppinion as soon as you have time to talk about anything else but Tomi. wink

Hi Sidd,

I just had a quick look and there’s nothing of any importance and nothing really related to Isaac, well, obviously apart from the header (which is of a course a copyright infringing parody of a derivative work consisting entirely of pre-existing geometric forms and a bastardized katakana/sci-fi hybrid font, certain sequences of which are partially trademarked by a subsidiary of Dell and possibly intellectually copyrighted by Whitley Strieber in another dimension but alas, LMH is the gatekeeper/Master of the key and is demanding subscription fees in advance..... User Image)

But regarding the header (here) then as you can see below, it is merely full sections of the LAP rotated (and also using other small sections as filler for the header graphic):

User Image


And as you’ve seen from Jed who pointed out the whois information which if followed up shows that the registrar is *GANDI SAS* which is actually Gandi.net and is merely a domain registration business, and if you perform a whois from their site it also shows that the registrant details (except the name) are in fact theirs:

nic-hdl: SB5052-GANDI
organisation: ~
person: simon biasi
obfuscated: Obfuscated by Gandi
address: (Gandi) 15 place de la Nation
zipcode: (Gandi) 75011
city: (Gandi) Paris
country: (Gandi) France
phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576


Which coupled with the fact that their ‘vehicle’ has been spotted in several US states (read the comments here):

User Image


Then it would seem to suggest that they are US based and hazarding a wild guess then possibly a real-world viral marketing of sorts (while relying on curiosity & word of mouth to propagate through the internet)? Seems plausible if it’s a viral tie-in of sorts hence not adding the *.com* to their vehicle as it would be a little obvious. They’ve stopped traffic and pointed searchlights at the sky as well as parking up for long periods so as to seemingly advertise the name.

And the bumph from their site (source code on every page) reads:

Quote:

Public disclosure is authorized and civil recruiting is directed for U.F.O.R.T by the Executive Orders of the International Commission for the Preservation of the Collective Consciousness as established in Agreement IV 12.12.1887-314-8 and Directive 444 in the Treaty of the Assembly of Transnational Owners. Compelled by the high probability of severe performance incapability’s resulting from the exponential increase of various cross dimensional incidents; all initiatives of Directive 444 are required to instate the assistance, skill, and talent of individuals testing proficient to gateway clearance level.

All activities of U.F.O.R.T and all knowledge exchanged by U.F.O.R.T is subject to disclosure by discretion of U.F.O.R.T Officer or Adviser with a Gateway Clearance Level 0. Any unauthorized activities or invalid identification will immediately terminate access and be subject to response team.

Which after a couple of searches for key terms offer no results except their own site and as it’s what I would affectionately call Lev-speak (and just a little too obtuse for Isaac-speak) I’d place it on my “pay-no-mind” list, well as far as its related to Isaac & the Drones.

But as I’ve said many times before, I could be way off the mark, hence ‘opinion’….. wink

Cheers!! grin
« Last Edit: Oct 7th, 2009, 10:57am by DrDil » User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Gort
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 0
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #554 on: Oct 7th, 2009, 12:52pm »

Now if I were to paint that on my car, is that a copyright infringement or a derivative? If I were to change it to UFOs response team, would that be legalhuh? Could I copyright thathuh Maybe get a patenthuh Use red letters, maybe Japanese? And then sue the originatorshuh
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 35 36 37 38 39  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls