Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Aug 17th, 2017, 2:22pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 50311 times)
Klatunictobarata
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #630 on: Oct 8th, 2009, 6:48pm »

on Oct 8th, 2009, 12:18pm, Gort wrote:
Anyone consider the woman is just plane crazy



As I pause reflect on these proceedings, I ponder this:

Who is the real victim here?

It's gotta be the husband, who is so lost in WoW he has to be terminally oblivious or a freaking vegetable by now.

But seriously, the troll m.o. concept is the best take on Tomi, because she purposefully pushes our serious buttons and sits back to observe our schadenfreude with relish.

I'm wondering if this behavior proved too much even for the DRT...
User IP Logged

Marvin
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mmm, yes, very curious, very interesting....


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 1119
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #631 on: Oct 9th, 2009, 07:52am »

on Oct 8th, 2009, 5:12pm, Masker33 wrote:
I will put it as plainly as possible. No one or no thing involved in any capacity with the original Drone, Issac, or Lap will ever claim credit or rights of any kind.



Hummmm.

Inside information. grin


The hoaxers should be proud. Look at what has been accomplished... and a future in the offering, congrats.

User IP Logged

Oh Goody! My Illudiom Pu-36 Explosive Space Modulator!

User Image

"You naughty earth specimens!"
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #632 on: Oct 13th, 2009, 9:32pm »

on Oct 8th, 2009, 12:26pm, tomi01uk wrote:
No more personal about me.. back to the drones or argue about mixing copyright law with trademark law fallacies...

Hi Tomi smiley,

As I’m sure you’re aware I’ve never once questioned your background regarding the copyright aspect and as there’s a couple of things bothering me about the recent discussion wanted to ask a couple of questions that really only you can answer. wink

Firstly I wanted to ask if you agree that the following statement is no more than copyright myth?

Quote:
"If it's posted to internet it's in the public domain."

And more importantly it is indeed a falsehood and/or myth because:

Quote:
Nothing modern and creative is in the public domain anymore unless the owner explicitly puts it in the public domain. Explicitly, as in you have a note from the author/owner saying, "I grant this to the public domain."

Which would bring us full circle regarding Isaac and did he actually release the documents into the public domain, so bearing this in mind what do you think about the following statement:

Quote:
Note that granting something to the public domain is a complete abandonment of all rights. You can't make something "PD for non-commercial use." If your work is PD, other people can even modify one byte and put their name on it.

Or is this similar to as somebody on these very forums once phrased it, “You can’t be a little bit pregnant”? laugh

So I guess the real crux of the matter, the core question, is whether or not in your learned opinion the LAP was actually ‘public domain’?
Not to worry though as, “Here’s one you prepared earlier!!” grin

User Image


As you can see you state unequivocally that This IS public Domain and furthermore EVERY factposted in the text you quoted points to this and I think perhaps it’s best to gloss over your massively informed opinion that, NO lawyer would touch this case if someone came out original copyright on the LAPnot least as it directly contradicts your last 100 or so posts…..

And you also stated the following which is again a direct contradiction to almost every one of your recent posts:

User Image


I was mainly attempting to highlight the fact that of course Alienware’s lawyers would have given this LAP-based line drawing the go-ahead before one solitary single case-design was drawn up. However I was still struggling in applying these concepts of yours to the situation at hand, i.e. the possible plagiarism committed by Alienware (again see your last 100 or so posts for further details) but again somewhat fortuitously you emphatically denied that Alienware would ever have such a case, going so far as to state: So on both fronts Alienware is covered”.

User Image


And finally when you wrote:

on Oct 6th, 2009, 12:12pm, tomi01uk wrote:
Having had the experience of copyright litigation that I've had, I think that makes me more qualified than you to make an assessment of the copyright aspects of the LAP.

Well..... In your (seemingly over-qualified grin) opinion which Tomi is right?

Is it *OMF_Tomi* or *UFOCB_Tomi*?

Or perhaps it’s easier to think of it as *2007_Tomi* & *2009_Tomi* but it shouldn’t really make a difference due to the fact that the recollections you’re drawing on happened prior to both Tomi_2007 & Tomi_2009’s statements and are both specifically regarding Alienware’s use of similar segments of the LAP schematic on their saleable goods, aren’t they?

And perhaps more importantly they directly contradict one another?

Cheers!! kiss





On a lighter note my absolute personal favourite snippet of related information was:

Quote:
Note that all this assumes the poster had the right to post the item in the first place. If the poster didn't, then all the copies are pirated, and no implied licence or theoretical reduction of the copyright can take place.

User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #633 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 12:26am »

Somewhere, off in the distance, a dog barked.
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

neveleeleven
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 227
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #634 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 04:33am »

DrDil,

hahahahaha.... your post is 100% comedic gold.

I thought I was the only one paying attention enough to strrrrreeeeeetch the argument and keep her talking so that I can do what you just did, and confront her in a major contradiction.

Honesty, the only reason I was arguing with her earlier was to watch her convict herself/himself/itself, and watch her dig a hole.... LOL

2007 Tomi vs 2009 Tomi....

...hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

So what do you think? Schizophrenia or very bad acting??

If I was a cop, or ex cop, and I noticed Tomi's constant contradiction of points of view, I would believe she is highly suspect. It is common for a liar to say one thing one day, and then another thing another day, because they forget. It's called inconsistency, and it is the first sign of someone purposely hiding something.
User IP Logged

Romans 12:6
Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #635 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 06:33am »

Strangely enough, the OMF(2007) Tomi sounds more correct than the UFOCB(2009) Tomi. The UFOCB Tomi just wants to have a counter viewpoint in order to keep droning on and on and on. Those old posts seem to agree with everything we have been trying to tell her but since that viewpoint is no longer conducive to her present agenda, her contradicting herself was inevitable.

Very nice analysis and observation, DrDil. I tip my hat to your intellect and memory!
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #636 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 09:23am »

Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it.
User IP Logged

Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #637 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 09:29am »

on Oct 14th, 2009, 09:23am, Masker33 wrote:
Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it.

yea yea you keep saying that..Do you have a point?.. wink

on Oct 14th, 2009, 06:33am, Jeddyhi wrote:
Very nice analysis and observation, DrDil. I tip my hat to your intellect and memory!

Ditto cheesy
« Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2009, 09:30am by Radi » User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #638 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 09:35am »

Yes I have a point and it was stated. Nice to see who started the ball in this thread rolling again. It was much better quiet as it should be.
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #639 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 09:45am »

on Oct 14th, 2009, 09:35am, Masker33 wrote:
Yes I have a point and it was stated. Nice to see who started the ball in this thread rolling again. It was much better quiet as it should be.


Silence can be a good form of damage control. grin
« Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2009, 09:46am by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #640 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 09:51am »

Dead things are usually very silent. The Drone Saga is of little use now. Lets see who keeps it running. Maybe a Drone is lifting a cow in Argentina!
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #641 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 10:03am »

on Oct 14th, 2009, 09:51am, Masker33 wrote:
Dead things are usually very silent. The Drone Saga is of little use now. Lets see who keeps it running. Maybe a Drone is lifting a cow in Argentina!


We know who is keeping it running. The drone saga seems to be of good use to the DRT and the Private Detectives who are going to be giving a drone presentation at the November Las Vegas UFO Convention.
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #642 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 10:22am »

Good, then you have your answers. I, on the other hand, have my own. I wish to see who keeps it running here.
Ufology, what can one say.
User IP Logged

Double Nought Spy
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1429
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #643 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 10:37am »

Masker, you crack me up. All of you! You have posted four times in the past hour, on the subject of "Who is trying to keep the drones alive?" That's really good, but not nearly as fine as what DrDil has brought us. Thank you, Good Dr. That is, as they say, priceless. cool
User IP Logged


All sane people detest noise. --Mark Twain

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #644 on: Oct 14th, 2009, 10:49am »

on Oct 14th, 2009, 10:22am, Masker33 wrote:
Good, then you have your answers. I, on the other hand, have my own. I wish to see who keeps it running here.
Ufology, what can one say.


Why is that of any relevance? Those who attempt to further propagate the drones as anything more than a hoax seem to be far more worthy of scrutiny than those that simply discuss the hoax aspect on Casebook.

The only one that attempted to keep the drones 'running' here was Tomi.
« Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2009, 3:23pm by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls