Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Oct 23rd, 2017, 03:11am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 61850 times)
Albert
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #720 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 4:45pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 4:40pm, YourWorstNightmare wrote:
Someone Albert , based on your dimesional rational..no one gives a fat baby's a$$ about for sure..you can bet a thousand dollars to a donut on on that..
and take it to the bank

I loved the critiques of Levs thumper by the way..thats where the focus should, on that little group..


thanks, that concludes my earlier statement about serious research here...

If you really gives a fat baby's a$$ about my postings here, I see no reason why I should employ further use of time to this forum.
User IP Logged

YourWorstNightmare
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #721 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 4:47pm »

Yes Jed he/she the third leg of the relief team ..hahahaha..which one..? cheesy
Seriously..lies have a habit of growing many legs
this caterpillar..forgot which one of its legs it starts to walk with first....its immobile now..
Albert..great for a sci fi thread or even mathematicians discussing N dimensions..your hypotheis is as valid as anything from imagination..but the doctored photos, lies and excuses, from people pushing them and the story are not...You dont have to leave the forum..just get to a relevant thread..
« Last Edit: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:26pm by YourWorstNightmare » User IP Logged

Albert
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #722 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 4:55pm »

What I am getting from the recent posters are, that any reality that doesn't check within the parameters of the function of this thread are to be discarded?

I strongly suggest you all to change your style, if not no one will be happy to entertain new ideas here..

You are a well woven group...and show how it's all done...

Cheers
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #723 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 4:57pm »

Don't go away mad.... grin

edited for politeness and manners.
« Last Edit: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:26pm by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #724 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:02pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 4:57pm, Jeddyhi wrote:
Don't go away mad....just go away, sockpuppet.

All are welcome here Jed, regardless of belief or sock-puppetry.

on Oct 16th, 2009, 4:45pm, Albert wrote:
thanks, that concludes my earlier statement about serious research here...

That’s a tad unfair Albert but you’re right in a way as we tend to “research” UFO reports and “discuss” hoaxes, and of course this is the Drone thread so hence the resulting discussion on the topic at hand (i.e. hoax) rather than the validity of an hypothesis based on transcendental multi-dimensional projections, well, as they directly relate to the Drones anyway…..

Cheers.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Albert
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #725 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:03pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 4:57pm, Jeddyhi wrote:
Don't go away mad....just go away, sockpuppet.


Nice, you seem to be an intelligent person, so why is it so hard to even look to another side of this issue?

Is it because you are so convinced of your own theory, that you don't allow others with another vision to join the forum?

Or, do you just feel the need to fry yet another person?
User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #726 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:08pm »

Sorry Albert, stay as long as you like! wink
« Last Edit: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:32pm by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Albert
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #727 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:09pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 5:02pm, DrDil wrote:
All are welcome here Jed, regardless of belief or sock-puppetry.


That’s a tad unfair Albert but you’re right in a way as we tend to “research” UFO reports and “discuss” hoaxes, and of course this is the Drone thread so hence the resulting discussion on the topic at hand (i.e. hoax) rather than the validity of an hypothesis based on transcendental multi-dimensional projections, well, as they directly relate to the Drones anyway…..

Cheers.


Thanks, DrDil,

As the "multiple" dimensions obviously doesn't fit the majority of posters here, it is nevertheless the most fitting theory, if one is looking apart from the "hoax" theory...

Everything points at some form of dimensional occurance, yet it is not much discussed here, only discarded as not a possibility.

Thats what I am implying. Nothing else.
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #728 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:13pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 5:03pm, Albert wrote:
Nice, you seem to be an intelligent person, so why is it so hard to even look to another side of this issue?

Is it because you are so convinced of your own theory, that you don't allow others with another vision to join the forum?

Or, do you just feel the need to fry yet another person?

Agreed and no-one is preventing you discussing your theories, (see above post).

But why must everything be Drone-related?

Your theory may be valid but when you frame it using the Drones as context it's surely bound for massive opposition, so why come here to do it? (“Of all the forums in all the land…..” grin)

And with the greatest respect I thought that's exactly why the DRT was formed and why you choose to post there rather than here and didn’t you yourself praise them for taking this initiative and heralding a brave new dawn for 'serious' research?

Yet you insist on returning here where most have weighed and measured the evidence and found it wanting?

Cheers.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #729 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:19pm »

If not a hoax, then Isaac is the man with the answers and they do not point at, hint at, or even slightly suggest they are from another dimension. According to Isaac, they are capable of invisibility, not multi-dimensional travel.

The drones are a hoax. They are fake. The witnesses are liars. The photos are bunk. They are a hoax.
« Last Edit: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:32pm by Jeddyhi » User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #730 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:19pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 5:09pm, Albert wrote:
Thanks, DrDil,

As the "multiple" dimensions obviously doesn't fit the majority of posters here, it is nevertheless the most fitting theory, if one is looking apart from the "hoax" theory...

Everything points at some form of dimensional occurance, yet it is not much discussed here, only discarded as not a possibility.

Thats what I am implying. Nothing else.

It’s that exact implication that is the problem.

You are dismissing the conclusion which practically everyone else has arrived at by how they personally qualified and quantified the available evidence.

In order to realistically promote a different theory there is much that must be explained regarding the old one before this is even considered, or at least prove it’s wrong.

A multi-dimensional shift doesn’t even begin to cover the witnesses (lack of) action or Isaacs pseudoscientific babble masquerading as a scientific study.

Obviously this is just my opinion but it’s a relatively informed one and this is why I suspect your theory has received the resistance it has.

Cheers. smiley
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Albert
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #731 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:22pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 5:13pm, DrDil wrote:
Agreed and no-one is preventing you discussing your theories, (see above post).

But why must everything be Drone-related?

Your theory may be valid but when you frame it using the Drones as context it's surely bound for massive opposition, so why come here to do it? (“Of all the forums in all the land…..” grin)

And with the greatest respect I thought that's exactly why the DRT was formed and why you choose to post there rather than here and didn’t you yourself praise them for taking this initiative and heralding a brave new dawn for 'serious' research?

Yet you insist on returning here where most have weighed and measured the evidence and found it wanting?

Cheers.


Oh, but I have the deepest respect of your research..if you look into the archives, I was a great listener of what you found...ask around..

I'm merely implying that some aspects may have been overlooked..and I humbly (Maybe not in the best fashion) are pointing out the issues...

I surely get the hint, that I'm no longer wanted here on the UFO Casebook, as you obviously think I have taken sides to this story, which is not entirely true, as I present some issues that might be of interest, but if you do not want this, I'll gladly leave, I only had a hope that there still was room for "thinking out of the box"..

Obviously there isn't...

User IP Logged

Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #732 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:22pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 5:02pm, DrDil wrote:
All are welcome here Jed, regardless of belief or sock-puppetry.


Agreed! That post came out wrong and I apologize to the forum as a whole. embarassed
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #733 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:25pm »

on Oct 16th, 2009, 5:22pm, Albert wrote:
Oh, but I have the deepest respect of your research..if you look into the archives, I was a great listener of what you found...ask around..

I'm merely implying that some aspects may have been overlooked..and I humbly (Maybe not in the best fashion) are pointing out the issues...

I surely get the hint, that I'm no longer wanted here on the UFO Casebook, as you obviously think I have taken sides to this story, which is not entirely true, as I present some issues that might be of interest, but if you do not want this, I'll gladly leave, I only had a hope that there still was room for "thinking out of the box"..

Obviously there isn't...


If you wish to stay or go that is your choice and as you can see in the above post the only member who voiced this opinion has apologised, so as usual it’s your choice if you decide to leave.

Cheers.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #734 on: Oct 16th, 2009, 5:27pm »

I edited the offending post and offer Albert a personal apology. wink
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Pages: 1 ... 47 48 49 50 51  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls