Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #10 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 14th, 2017, 12:45pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #10  (Read 70462 times)
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #900 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 05:20am »

on Nov 8th, 2009, 02:09am, YourWorstNightmare wrote:
Free Forum does not equate to non profit..No Traffic no Profit The profit is traffic..nothing to do with truth. Like you said You knew it was hoax as you said earlier..That was the truth..but your Job is keep the traffic going..is bthat clear enough? comparing the urls has everything to do with the interest..less traffic less interest..less interest..somebody gets off their duffle and keep stirring..like those bufoons in the article..
Nothing personal ..just business.. cool

Like SPFs group We Work for Them..so do you..in a manner of speaking.. smiley

A free forum host means exactly that, there is no profit.

Traffic DOES exactly equate to non-profit.

The adverts you see on the forum are NOT displayed by UFOCasebook but by the free forum host.

My “job” has nothing to do with UFOs or the internet, if you’re talking about moderating the forum being my job then while the malicious suggestions and vindictive intent from your quarters doesn’t really surprise me, it never fails to disappoint for many, many reasons.....
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #901 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 1:59pm »

Attention! Attention!

Sidd calling here!

Is there anybody out there in Vegas?

The show starts in 2 hours as far as we are informed.

Any field reporters in the field?

Where is Murnut with his mobile?
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #902 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 5:23pm »

This is so exciting!
Unless there's some earth shattering info at this conference it's gonna be slim pickings again. Speaking of pickings, maybe nose shadows have some bearing on it all! rolleyes
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #903 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 5:26pm »

I'm up loading a recording of it now on divshare, will post links ..
meanwhile.. WELL DONE !
and
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #904 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 5:32pm »

First of two.

http://www.divshare.com/download/9259523-574

the 2nd half

http://www.divshare.com/download/9259726-fe6

There maybe a few minutes or so missing in the middle, sorry...
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2009, 5:58pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #905 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 5:38pm »

Thanks Tomi, I hope it's not one of these cliffhanger's to be continued! grin
Downloading it as I type.
User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #906 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 5:42pm »

Seems the powers are against us, even Tomi's youtube may not be embedded.

I think, it was all DrDil's plan to earn a lot of money with ads - of course, assisted by Tomi from the British Mafia - or it was done by those guys in the trees at Lake Tahoe.
User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #907 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 5:45pm »

Okay, I now can listen to the real thing!

Thanks, tomi!
User IP Logged

murnut
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 615
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #908 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 6:00pm »

on Nov 8th, 2009, 1:59pm, SiddReader wrote:
Where is Murnut with his mobile?


Ha...I wouldn't be interested in anything they'd have to say....except who paid them
User IP Logged

You want a revolution?
You've got to make a difference on your own
You want a revolution?
Stand up, stand out and make it known
Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #909 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 6:03pm »

on Nov 8th, 2009, 6:00pm, murnut wrote:
Ha...I wouldn't be interested in anything they'd have to say....except who paid them

It's Frenchman owner of UFO site. Also, that LMH provided some hi-rez Ty images. That's it so far in Part 1.
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #910 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 6:07pm »

on Nov 8th, 2009, 5:32pm, tomi01uk wrote:
There maybe a few minutes or so missing in the middle, sorry...

Agh..... a Watergate and NASA missing tape episode! grin
Thanks again for sharing the audio. smiley
User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #911 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 6:20pm »

Hahahahahahahaha!

I liked his explanation of his disguise though!
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #912 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 6:49pm »

Well LMH chimmed in at the end stealing away from the PI's minute of fame on national TV replay.
Further questions can be asked at the bar! grin
Not much new for the diehards following this this but probably of interest to others. The PI's did get around, have a good sense of humour and not surprisingly had some strange happenings.
I don't agree with their $50K estimate of the cost to hoax this.
DroneHoax.com and Casebook got a plug! cool
To be continued .....

Forgot, there's a person of interest who lived in the complex by the pole. Reminded me of Robert. shocked
« Last Edit: Nov 8th, 2009, 7:13pm by Katterfelto » User IP Logged

neveleeleven
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 227
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #913 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 7:51pm »

My thoughts....

They didn't mention the lighting problems with the drone when they should have. However they did mention Dronehoax.com...

They didn't mention the Sarah Conner Chronicles thing.

They didn't really mention Alienware actually using the symbols.

Also, I find it really curious that SOMEONE from the Dead Right There team didn't mention TKDavis' link to LA Times reporters after lots of debate around the issue. The session clarifies that TKDavis had friends in the right places to get that story published.

I'm glad to find out who is actually funding this mayhem.

Also, I find the 40k-50K estimate of cost for this hoax a complete and utter joke. This entire hoax could be made in a day for the cost of a six-pack of beer.

LHM's pathetic rant was a joke..

The best part of the entire session was when LMH got interrupted by the words "A HOAX!" playing really loud from the premature video. That was fate....

Finding out TKDavis car caught on fire was funny. My friend is a tow truck driver and he said you wouldn't believe how often that happens.

It's good to know they are looking for those suspicious guys that moved out of the Avalon apartments. The dad who supposedly worked on drones, and the roommate computer expert, and the other guy. I doubt it is a coincidence, it sounds more like facts used for inspiration and implementation. That seems like a good thing to follow up on...

Over all, I think it is really sad that a couple of old guys (PIs) and LMH are wasting the last stretch of their lives by chasing a hoax. Almost as sad as watching a fly try to escape through a closed window while knowing that is how it will spend the rest of his life.

LMH still thinks its a "very important story".... lol.... Well, it has already been proven by her track record that any good CGI UFO is "very important" to her.

User IP Logged

Romans 12:6
Jeddyhi
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 589
xx Re: Drone Discussion #10
« Reply #914 on: Nov 8th, 2009, 9:03pm »

A Drone promo. rolleyes

Anyone surprised? I suppose no one wanted to hear how the whole case amazingly parallels how an internet hoax would unfold. I mean, come on.....the drones could be a poster child for an internet hoax. If somebody asked "What would an internet hoax look like?", you could point right to the drone case.

If the drones are not an internet hoax, why do they fit the bill so well? Name me one thing about the case that does not suggest internet hoax?

The DRT's obsession with justifying the drones and attempts at painting the case with any credibility is just plain silly. The case has nothing of substance unless you are wanting to explain how a never before seen object can be shown to people along with a little back story and, abracadabra, it must be true......people will not only fall for it, they will strongly promote it and fight to authenticate it.

The reactions of drone believers and the extent and depth of their conviction is certainly a case study in human behavior.

The PI's....smiling with every received payment. They sound like they catered right to the clients needs, telling the client what they want to hear and keeping the mystery going and going and going and going so the checks keep coming and coming and coming and coming.

Is almost as if someone hired some PI's to find and locate the tooth fairy and the PI's don't want to break it to the client that there is no tooth fairy, only that they can't find the tooth fairy. grin
User IP Logged

"Nothing will ever claim ownership of the original Drone information, so copyright is not a question. Use it."- Masker33
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls