Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #11 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Aug 21st, 2017, 10:31pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 86 87 88 89 90  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #11  (Read 159061 times)
LagrimasNegras
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1305 on: Jul 2nd, 2012, 03:19am »

Fantastico Klat, ..its not often we get to review such great works that are so extra ordinary..no...super ordinary..some might dare I say..peerlessly ordinary! The lines the junction boxes, sprockets and what not are a thing to behold over and over in sheer wonder. Engendering the question what Godly mind felt compassion enough to allow such a work to fall into our unworthy hands. They cut Prometheus the middle man out and went straight for us. I don't blame those poor DRT for doing as some natives did three quarters of a century ago, when a plane landed and they rebuilt a replica out of straw, and worship it..giving it a history, and a raison d'etre thanks to Douglas, going back thousands of years even!!
User Image
It had been foretold of in their legends..just like Whitley foretold the drones. Just like Linda and George spread the word, time and time again over the heads of blasphemous nay sayers, there was no stopping them with facts. Oh no they had reyes from their ranks in unknown country.., the twin sisters, Brent, half of los Gatos and Campbell.. an entire cast of martyrs..this was Jihad! if a religion can sprout from a plane or wooden cross or christmas ornament in shape of a star..well..imagine what a full blown whizzing flying crop circle can do? shocked Why it can be the battering ram needed for disclosure! Something they all wanted desperatley..Add OMF and our straw ufo is the polar express to a spankin new paradigm.! ya know....It takes special people to defend the indefensible, lie after lie, and promote something so extra ordinary as this was and still stand as a testament..a shining obolisk of sorts to remind us what not to be. for that we are humbled and beholdin and celebrate what happens when we cerebrate too much. . It boggles the mind! cool

« Last Edit: Jul 2nd, 2012, 03:31am by LagrimasNegras » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1306 on: Jul 2nd, 2012, 03:32am »

Right, it was late night when I wrote that.. One spelling mistake... geesh.... extraordinary!

User IP Logged

LagrimasNegras
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1307 on: Jul 2nd, 2012, 11:24am »

I know little things can lead to great things Tommi, but I am absolutely certain no one but yourself picked up on that typo.
No grammar policing on my part, as it would be the epitome of pettiness to do so. We are all too human
If that were the case we would have been having a field day with Isaacs narratives and masterpiece, the single most important document in the His story of Ufology!

Here are some examples from that rivetting essay.
were among the few places that didn't have an armged colorguard

every element of each "diagram" is dependant on
Here is the breif introduction My DoD experience did make me more eligable for positions of management

Right, there but for the Grace of God go I too, or even Didier, and OTF Tommi...
We are in good company smiley

So don't ever feel that way.
That obstacle out of the way, would you share with us what was the extraordinary part for you?..
« Last Edit: Jul 2nd, 2012, 11:46am by LagrimasNegras » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1308 on: Jul 2nd, 2012, 3:19pm »

on Jul 2nd, 2012, 11:24am, IKTOMI wrote:
That obstacle out of the way, would you share with us what was the extraordinary part for you?..


No, because you will probably pick on me. rolleyes
But I think that the inventory, the roto rooter and the bb drone images are very hard to explain or replicate.
And why would someone employ such capabilites if only to deceive or esp to deceive. But why or who?
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1309 on: Jul 2nd, 2012, 5:46pm »

I don't know if anyone does know for certain or even assumes that they are not terrestrial except that they appear to be pieces of the drones in the photographs, everyone wouldn't have any conceptions of what they are.. would they?

I mean what would a mechanical engineer say they look like from a purely terrestrial pov?

« Last Edit: Jul 2nd, 2012, 5:47pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

LagrimasNegras
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1310 on: Jul 2nd, 2012, 8:30pm »

Are you serious? How quickly we forget, but it has been 5 years, so you probably forgot. Understandable, but that question was adressed on July 6, 2007. So it is Very Timely. From Whitleys own ranks an Engineer the most prolific in real life drone technology, sofware development, remote control systems, built RC craft, and was former owner of a steel fabrication business. can't get more mechanical or electrical than that for our purposes can we..
User Image
why would a such a professional tell us to essentially scrub or deferr the pictures of these craft, which were in his professional opinion not as important as the writings, or even the emerging story itself.
Do you understand the significance of that?
That is a clear qualified exercise of critical thinking that you choose to disregard and subsitute with musings.
He didn't share that POV with you, Sid, and Nicodemus while you were a member of his working commitee group? rolleyes



« Last Edit: Jul 2nd, 2012, 9:35pm by LagrimasNegras » User IP Logged

TheShadow
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 299
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1311 on: Jul 2nd, 2012, 9:28pm »

on Jul 2nd, 2012, 3:19pm, tomi01uk wrote:
And why would someone employ such capabilites if only to deceive or esp to deceive. But why or who?


Because they can!
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1312 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 09:22am »

Would you let a software engineer rebuild your car's engine? A phd in computer sciences is not a mechanical engineer. That probably explains why he was more fascinated with the LAP and other aspects than the mechanical representations in the inventory photo.

Also, I never had any conversations with Reyes, as I was just a lurker there.
User IP Logged

LagrimasNegras
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1313 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 1:10pm »

yes Shad they can and they did.. grin
OH no you didn't Tommi..the man was cross disciplined, ran a steel fabrication shop for heavens sake, have you ever heard of electro-mechanical switches? you are affiliated with boating, like transportation , like a car ya know..they are all built on blueprints, schematics, and flow charts that direct the flow of energies, and assign functions for the same. familiar with remote control processors and their programming.
I wont insult you as you expect, I will say that was intentionally naive if not misleading.
So whether a flying et craft, or sikorsky helicopter parts or from an 1956 Buick or ET CAR he would know better than you would..wouldn't he.. much less qualify you to cut him down in size . he was very important

I certainly would hire of him, and entertain his opinion, . You have no opinion and are stuck up the creek without a paddle, or even a rudder.

If I were to "speculate" I can what I know of him, his thoughts, his personal logs.. It is probably why Linda bailed out, shrewdly predicting what he might say..after all had time to look at the gobbly gook in the LAP and knew that it would hurt his career at the univ, far more important to him, than an appearance with his Idol Whitley.
That is why, imo, he was a no show, and stopped answering his emails. At least your close acquaintance Linda , as close you have led us believe, and contrary to your opinion of him, thought him germane enough to" invite" him live on c2c.. and not any of the others like Joe the mechanic of the Big Three..or Knowhow from Atlantis.

But if you now say he is not qualified enough to comment even on your ETCAR ..even when he owned several real world cars models. made,flew Remote controlled craft, won competitions , and was funded by Darpa at Arlington..with real systems impact on how we wage war today....what and who do you have left. The whole pt of caret was to take was not not understood..compare and extract what was recogniable, and see if if a working model of even a toater could be fashioned for sale some how..
You No one..How can you after that even begin to ask "why"? and disregard that pov..on your say so?..

So even though you want to evade , dismiss, and diminish his capacity and credential ..you can't, even when he is dead, his words more alive and weightier than anything any POV..all of have proffered from your camp....you can't twist his words, for if you could you would..flaunting him in our face at every opportunity... no.. you only run from Arthurs words....as Linda ran, as George ran, as Whitley ran, as Isaac our poster child ran when the light of day came. It'ss the closest thing to a stampede when a shot is fired we will ever see.grin

Thank you too for joining and hanging in our celebration Tommi. It wouldn't be the same without you .There will be lots to come. grin




« Last Edit: Jul 3rd, 2012, 1:32pm by LagrimasNegras » User IP Logged

MysterEd
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1314 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 1:18pm »

I question that a mechanical engineer is qualified to speak at all about the supposed function and behavior of these parts made by Isaac and others. An aerodynamic engineer would be of no use either because the claims eliminate any verification.

Come to think of it who is really qualified to give an opinion that this stuff is real and can be backed up? They would just be waisting their time. grin
User IP Logged

LagrimasNegras
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1315 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 1:49pm »

on Jul 3rd, 2012, 1:18pm, Katterfelto wrote:
I question that a mechanical engineer is qualified to speak at all about the supposed function and behavior of these parts made by Isaac and others. An aerodynamic engineer would be of no use either because the claims eliminate any verification.

Come to think of it who is really qualified to give an opinion that this stuff is real and can be backed up? They would just be waisting their time. grin


Ketter! LoL, Thank goodness we planned ahead with food..After all that has transpired, Its difficult to have a discussion here after and still not laugh, and not post it in our favorite thread upstairs.and not get hungry at the same time. Klat is making a Secret Souffle Supreme of something or other..Hope its as good as last years POV Pot Roast you made., I can still feel those little thingies wiggling inside! grin
« Last Edit: Jul 3rd, 2012, 1:55pm by LagrimasNegras » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1316 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 2:40pm »

Guys.. call me naive if you want to but I was thinking of a mechanical engineer who has been a nuts and bolts guy all his life. He has seen the parts of a lot of machines and he would recognise similiar shapes to say it was terrestrial because it came out of an old washing machine back in 1946 or something with a new style whatever.... designed in Germany of course smiley
Anyway..... call me naive because I wasn't aware of Reyes background in the way you described it either..

Somehow or other we got sidetracked, wasn't the aspect we were discussing something like would you think these objects are extraterrestrial just from the photo if you never saw the drone images? And I said....
« Last Edit: Jul 3rd, 2012, 2:43pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

MysterEd
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1317 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 4:10pm »

Well what about the poor saps that drew similarities of A1 to
these little devils?

User Image

They were raked throughly over the burning coals by the rabid believers if resent memory serves me. Did anyone want to believe this was the inspiration? Nah. Silly ignorant experts imagining things. grin
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3952
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1318 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 4:17pm »

Yeah... that was pretty low.. choosing.
I think it looks like a generator smiley
And I'm just guessing using Google Images.
User IP Logged

MysterEd
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1319 on: Jul 3rd, 2012, 5:27pm »

And ..... next in the batters box or perhaps the warm-up circle is the ever popular Heavy Duty Flexible I Beam White Track - wearing number 23 tonight. grin

User Image
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 86 87 88 89 90  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls