Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #11 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 23rd, 2017, 2:03pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 91 92 93 94 95  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #11  (Read 147171 times)
Equalizer
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1380 on: Feb 22nd, 2013, 4:39pm »

on Feb 22nd, 2013, 3:42pm, HAL9000 wrote:
Klat,

I did indeed think that I may be correct. By being the shy, self deprecating soul that I am I just let them get on with it.

Once someone admits to hoaxing even a part of a case, the thing is dead.

HAL

Don't forget that it is hug-a-believer week. So be kind. wink


HAL...I agree and the cockles of my heart lit up warmly at that thought and gesture..that goes out to OMF and OMF productins, to LMH and LMH productions, Whitleys and His studios..and lets not forget that the NDA s of TSCC, not to be confused with Near Death Adventures, have yet to expire until 2014 or there abouts and that is when the trickle gate opens,
User Image

TSCC Drones"[citation needed] are the progenitors of Non-Humanoid Hunter Killers being developed as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in 2008 by agencies such as "Desert Canyon Heat and Air" with access to hyperalloy[citation needed]and other future artifacts found after Terminator incursions.

It is a tri-engine airborne unit with similarities to the HK-Drone[1], it retains the form and a similar maneuver system but on a much larger scale. Angular and more alien in appearance than the HK-Aerial [2] or HK-VTOL [3] the TSCC Drone is often mistaken for a UFO sighting. Operating in secret with teams of isolated scientists, the agencies developing the drones will target infiltrators and those who violate their Non-Disclosure Agreements with lethal force.


one of the many realities our severely limited minds have yet to grasp!!!!! American Shirley would figuratively roll over in her grave were it any other way. Ya know even James Camerons dear mum was named Shirley, he would understand!
smiley

ps..for any new comers to this affair..please do visit dronehoax.com and it will be shown that it was not merely CGI arguments that killed the drone story as presented nor even the humor thread, or alabama story, nor Ted in subsequent re-incarnation attempts with help from the same people named.
If one wants to look at it as an internets digital cropcircle with all its caveat vendor/emptors..then that s fine too. smiley
« Last Edit: Feb 22nd, 2013, 5:12pm by Equalizer » User IP Logged

dejarmax
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1381 on: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:02pm »

Sorry for commenting without spending more than 5 minutes reading through this large thread but:

surely there can't be folks who still have doubts about this being a hoax? Please put me right if I'm miss-reading the general point of this topic..

dej...
User IP Logged

MysterEd
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1382 on: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:11pm »

Have you taken my poll?

I guess surely falls within the matter of fact rejection of the drones. But no one is telling anyone what to think or believe here.
User IP Logged

Equalizer
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1383 on: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:25pm »

Coming from ATS Dejar
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread823620/pg1
surely you remember the Caret designation of Hoax by Springer years ago. The interest I stated there is the same here. Post Mortem analysis.. Case study of the disassembly of hoax into the components that propelled it for future use and identification of principals. The same process that led many to learn to vet the sources and media and guests on C2C, Earthfiles, Streiber, and the very real pecuniary interests involved. Differentiating on types of Hoaxters, at the water hole , such as the sick J.N of Pisces Media of Au, , or the klingons of Internal Astronauts, disclosure fanatics, and Immersion Artists and the very real practices and dynamics between movie tv makers, the news media and Pc makers in selling their goods.
No one is coming here saying its real..but certainly worth reading as a case study and learning to look more closely not only at the event, but the "trusted" people leaving it on our doorsteps, and the interests behind them.. cool
« Last Edit: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:30pm by Equalizer » User IP Logged

dejarmax
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1384 on: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:39pm »

on Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:25pm, Equalizer wrote:
but certainly worth reading as a case study and learning to look more closely not only at the event, but the "trusted" people leaving it on our doorsteps, and the interests behind them.. cool
If I remember rightly the drone case was first put forward anonymously! So what do you mean by trust? Do you mean trusting the original claim starter or those who first put forward an anonymous claim for public scrutiny?

dej...
User IP Logged

Equalizer
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1385 on: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:48pm »

on Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:39pm, dejarmax wrote:
If I remember rightly the drone case was first put forward anonymously! So what do you mean by trust? Do you mean trusting the original claim starter or those who first put forward an anonymous claim for public scrutiny?

dej...


Take it how you like bro....you asked the question. There was a sequence Raj and Chad steph etc...trusted source ..C2c and LMH...the gospels of all things ufo..I gave you an answer..I'm not rehashing ad nauseum whats on the record..and you already know where to get the answers, if you are not happy with mine..
peace
sys
« Last Edit: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:55pm by Equalizer » User IP Logged

dejarmax
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1386 on: Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:53pm »

on Feb 22nd, 2013, 7:48pm, Equalizer wrote:
Take it how you like bro....you asked the question. There was a sequence Rac and Chad steph etc...trusted source ..C2c and LMH.....I gave you an answer..I'm not rehashing ad nauseum whats on the record..and you already know where to get the answers, if you are not happy with mine..
fair enough
User IP Logged

purr
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

..you talkin' to me...YOU TALKIN' TO ME..??!


PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 4783
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1387 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 09:36am »

on Feb 23rd, 2013, 08:59am, Қℓάť wrote:
Say, might I enquire:

Who is this 'surely' person everyone keeps mentioning in these posts?

Would it also be fair to say that surely she knows the truth about the drones?

And what about that boy who is surely expressing unbridled thanks to UFOCB on that yonder barren place? grin


Perhaps member Dejarmax has an Australian lady friend addressed Surely? (I'm being a twit smiley ) Seriously, I think I agree with most that the Isaac and drone saga is rife with hoaxes. But I think not all the information was false. I'm going back into my closet, door is closed...


cool
« Last Edit: Feb 23rd, 2013, 09:37am by purr » User IP Logged

Let us be sure that those who come after will say of us in our time, that in our time we did everything that could be done. We finished the race; we kept them free; we kept the faith.

-RONALD REAGAN
MysterEd
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1388 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 10:31am »

on Feb 23rd, 2013, 08:59am, Қℓάť wrote:
Say, might I enquire:
And what about that boy who is surely expressing unbridled thanks to UFOCB on that yonder barren place? grin


Klat I don't think we will ever understand the real underlying reason why UFOCB is being thanked and given credit. The ole pat on the back is being accepted by others taking credit for UFOCB's credit. So anything we may have contributed only deserves a second or third hand credit. I would call it a pat on the back by a red velvet gloved hand while the other hand hangs the diploma. grin
User IP Logged

dejarmax
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1389 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 2:08pm »

on Feb 23rd, 2013, 09:45am, Қℓάť wrote:
[color=Beige]

Forum disrupters are really not welcomed here, and I am speaking only for myself...as I know others might probably silently welcome them.

We know who they are, and the Mods here will ensure every consideration that we all play by the rules or be banned a second time...or even a third time.


So because the likes of myself are not convinced by the data that the likes of you are; this makes me a forum disrupter!huh If this place indicated it was for believers only I wouldn't be here! Is it for believers only? If so I'll go.....

It seems some think I'm someone else!? Just ask me ole mate Doc Dil.. He knows who I am...

Peace guys

dej...
User IP Logged

dejarmax
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1390 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 2:48pm »

on Feb 23rd, 2013, 09:36am, purr wrote:
Perhaps member Dejarmax has an Australian lady friend addressed Surely? (I'm being a twit smiley ) Seriously, I think I agree with most that the Isaac and drone saga is rife with hoaxes. But I think not all the information was false. I'm going back into my closet, door is closed...


cool
I'm quite sure there are many Shirleys in Australia. But the common slang term for an Australian female is Sheila smiley tho I do appreciate your attempt at comedy, purr. grin

dej...
User IP Logged

HAL9000
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1391 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 3:02pm »

...Who is this 'surely' person everyone keeps mentioning in these posts?..

I actually think that he hasn't seen the film.

So be nice.

HAL
smiley
User IP Logged

LoneGunMan
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Sgt. Major of the Deadly,Evil, Reptilian Hunters of America


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3316
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1392 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 3:57pm »

HAL,Surely you jest!!

Lone
User IP Logged

De Opresso Libre! I Have Been many Men, In Many Times, I Shall Be Again!
\"The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits.\"
Plutarch



HAL9000
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1393 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 3:59pm »

That's the one.

HAL smiley
User IP Logged

HAL9000
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #1394 on: Feb 23rd, 2013, 4:07pm »

And don't keep calling me Shirley.

HAL wink
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 91 92 93 94 95  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls