Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #11 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 19th, 2017, 1:46pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 2 3 4  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #11  (Read 9065 times)
neveleeleven
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 227
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #15 on: Feb 25th, 2010, 7:13pm »

Did he say to follow the DRT? LOL!

I can't find the posts right now, but I think it was back in 2007, and 2008, and maybe 2009 that I said the Alabama sighting was fake.

Actually I have a post where I was making fun of the DRT for including such a poorly done CGI render on their main droneteam.com page, and actually supporting the hoax with their ignorance, or involvement, or both?

I even made comments on how the model looks like it was rendered by the same program that Lev uses.

Why would anyone follow the DRT when they were supporting this string of HOAXES?

DRT is just an echo. They are finding out things that have already been known. They are the only ones that still care enough to continue (paying) to the end even though the end is already known.

The drone hoaxes are all fake, all lies, and the people that created it are all morons looking for attention.
« Last Edit: Feb 25th, 2010, 7:27pm by neveleeleven » User IP Logged

Romans 12:6
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #16 on: Feb 25th, 2010, 8:22pm »

I could not agree more, but for other reasons.
grin grin grin grin grin grin
Quote:
The drone hoaxes are all fake, all lies, and the people that created it are all morons looking for attention.
« Last Edit: Feb 25th, 2010, 8:24pm by masker33 » User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #17 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 3:01pm »

The most interesting thing is that the "morons" found attention even if for a while. The real real truth is still not known and will never be known and there is the rub. Let us all wait for the next big or small show in this game of ufology.
User IP Logged

Gort
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 0
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #18 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 3:24pm »

on Feb 26th, 2010, 3:01pm, Icarus99 wrote:
and there is the rub.


"the rub" kinda like when you walk in the house and that odor tells you that even though you tried to rub it off some unwanted portion of your pet dog remains on the bottom of your shoe. tomi, that's your "q" as she says- but there still could be a real alien foot print on the rug.
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #19 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 3:33pm »

Gort, you need to correct the ratios on your avatar. They do not do justice to this Sci Fi Classic. If Tomi comes back it will be by your summoning, do you really want that!
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #20 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 3:53pm »

on Feb 26th, 2010, 3:01pm, Icarus99 wrote:
The real real truth is still not known and will never be known.....

How do you know it exists then?
Appears we are back to the game of 20 questions.
Can we play a game of "Hot" "Cold" perhaps to liven this place up a bit? smiley
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #21 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 6:23pm »

Quote:
Appears we are back to the game of 20 questions.
Can we play a game of "Hot" "Cold" perhaps to liven this place up a bit?


The resolution to the Alabama/Georgia Drone seems resolved to the satisfaction of the majority. If there might be other things involved here and there why bother. The complete hoax solution is suitable to explain the Alabama/Georgia Drone. The DRT continues to bat around other Drone/LAP aspects and so it goes.
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #22 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 7:01pm »

on Feb 25th, 2010, 4:29pm, Katterfelto wrote:
Hi DrDil. smiley
If those CG people who looked at that center light area were experts, I think we have to believe them. grin

Hi Katt!! grin

Experts?

I always assumed he meant computer generated people!! laugh


Cheers. smiley
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #23 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 7:02pm »

on Feb 26th, 2010, 6:23pm, Icarus99 wrote:
The resolution to the Alabama/Georgia Drone seems resolved to the satisfaction of the majority. If there might be other things involved here and there why bother. The complete hoax solution is suitable to explain the Alabama/Georgia Drone. The DRT continues to bat around other Drone/LAP aspects and so it goes.

Then why are you and I here? Why do you keep mentioning the Alabama/Georgia Drone?
Some bother because there are still questions certain people want answers to.
You know, curiosity and such. grin
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #24 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 7:09pm »

on Feb 26th, 2010, 7:01pm, DrDil wrote:
Hi Katt!! grin

Experts?

I always assumed he meant computer generated people!! laugh


Cheers. smiley

That too. grin
Or it's the output of the simulation model being employed.
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #25 on: Feb 26th, 2010, 7:12pm »

on Feb 25th, 2010, 6:44pm, Icarus99 wrote:
I expect what I get here and find as much humor in your posts as you do in mine. It must be the Best of All Possible Worlds as Dan says. After all only a few players are left as if it was supposed to be that way.
Delightful.


I know that wasnít a compliment but Iím claiming it as one!! grin

"Donít hate the players, hate the game"?

Or perhaps,

"It may be rigged but it's the only game in town." wink


Divine.

User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #26 on: Feb 27th, 2010, 6:16pm »

Is this thread and the drone humor thread beginning to blur! If so does it matter. I love this simulation model even though I have not a clue what it is. Dan should be consulted on the effects here.
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #27 on: Feb 27th, 2010, 8:14pm »

on Feb 27th, 2010, 6:16pm, Icarus99 wrote:
Is this thread and the drone humor thread beginning to blur! If so does it matter. I love this simulation model even though I have not a clue what it is. Dan should be consulted on the effects here.


I do try hard now to keep the off topic to the humor thread and maybe Iíll post such a model schematic and/or its equation there. grin

Regardless, the simulation model concept is simple. Letís use an electrical analogy first that could just as easily be applicable to the Drone Saga.

One takes a few components or subjects grin Ė letís use a resistor (R) in series with an inductor (L) and capacitor (C). Letís now excite this group with an appropriate stimuli (INPUT) i.e., a voltage source (V) and measure the response (OUTPUT) across C.

The Drone saga analogy would be:

Resistor = R = skeptic (damping)
Inductor = L = your typical UFO believer (mass)
Capacitor = C = on the fence believer (1/elastance)
Voltage Source = V = any post on a forum (force) = STIMULIS

Values in () above are mechanical equivalents for those mechanically inclined. smiley

Hereís what can happen:

For Large R, C, Small L. OUTPUT = a stable, well behaved response that reaches the INPUT after a long time and stays there.

For Small R. Small C, Large L. OUTPUT = erratic responses (truth/lie) over some time but most likely settles on the INPUT and stays there.

For Small R, L and C. OUTPUT = whatever the INPUT is at any time.

I can go on but I hope I made my point. I assumed simple stimuli (V) but, of course, that is not always the case. Non-linear results could result as well as chaotic responses highly dependent on initial conditions. The interested reader should research the Butterfly affect.

Apply to the Drone Saga as you feel fit. It's a simplified example only, you fill in what the INPUT really is and means. grin

QED

ps I don't care what Dan the Man may say or believe
« Last Edit: Feb 28th, 2010, 04:13am by Katterfelto » User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #28 on: Feb 28th, 2010, 3:01pm »

on Feb 25th, 2010, 8:22pm, Icarus99 wrote:
I could not agree more, but for other reasons.
grin grin grin grin grin grin


I guess, you are talking about those guys, who get messages from the tv and from the newspapers, telling them, they are just prisoners here on earth...
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #29 on: Feb 28th, 2010, 3:14pm »

Oh, now I understand and as for the Dan I refer to................
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3 4  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls