Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #11 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 24th, 2017, 12:09am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #11  (Read 147260 times)
Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #180 on: May 19th, 2010, 2:35pm »

OMG..I just found out about this..circa 11/22/2009

http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/estranged_wife_killed_husband:_police

http://www.theshorthorn.com/content/view/18494/265/

*Edit to reduce URL to:* http://tinyurl.com/3aewcv2

Arthur Reyes is Dead..shot not by an MIB..but by his wife ...not a mention on C2C or Earth files..that I can recall..Guess too real for their usual menu of Pablum..
If they did..good..if not..as usual they void..

First credible Drone witness that never got to testify about the Drones on air because LMH cancelled it, and rushed off to uk to see a crop circle.
He was by far the most interesting because he is the only one you knew from the gitgo was real..credentialed and verifiable..
Im checking Whitleys site to see if he posted anything..Prof. Arthur..was a brilliant man, scientist and a beloved teacher...a real avid admirer of Whitley's..if you all read his logs.
This is quite unsettling.


Nevertheless..Belated respects to family
I'll remember him for a long time to come
RIP

(Mod Edit as link was stretching page).
« Last Edit: May 20th, 2010, 11:23am by DrDil » User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #181 on: May 19th, 2010, 3:55pm »

One more example. It's sad, but true...
User IP Logged

Radi
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




Homepage PM


Posts: 176
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #182 on: May 19th, 2010, 4:50pm »

on May 19th, 2010, 2:35pm, Sysconfig wrote:
OMG..I just found out about this..circa 11/22/2009

http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/estranged_wife_killed_husband:_police

http://www.theshorthorn.com/content/view/18494/265/
*Edit to reduce URL to:* http://tinyurl.com/3aewcv2

Arthur Reyes is Dead..shot not by an MIB..but by his wife ...not a mention on C2C or Earth files..that I can recall..Guess too real for their usual menu of Pablum..
If they did..good..if not..as usual they void..

First credible Drone witness that never got to testify about the Drones on air because LMH cancelled it, and rushed off to uk to see a crop circle.
He was by far the most interesting because he is the only one you knew from the gitgo was real..credentialed and verifiable..
Im checking Whitleys site to see if he posted anything..Prof. Arthur..was a brilliant man, scientist and a beloved teacher...a real avid admirer of Whitley's..if you all read his logs.
This is quite unsettling.


Nevertheless..Belated respects to family
I'll remember him for a long time to come
RIP


Hello Sysco...Glad to see you are around still.. laugh
I have been laying low and watching the show...Oh boy what a sad fact of life this brings....Reality........
Interesting how it began in 2007 but for those who need a face to go along with this...
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=arthur-a-reyes&pid=136845605
RIP.....

I did however found this bit interesting....
Quote:
Recently he had aided in the design and development of unmanned aircraft systems.
Read more: http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=arthur-a-reyes&pid=136845605#ixzz19krVUhR0
« Last Edit: May 20th, 2010, 11:25am by DrDil » User IP Logged

Klatunictobarata
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #183 on: May 19th, 2010, 5:13pm »

on May 19th, 2010, 4:50pm, Radi wrote:
I did however found this bit interesting....
Quote:Recently he had aided in the design and development of unmanned aircraft systems.
Read more: http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/dfw/obituary.aspx?n=arthur-a-reyes&pid=136845605#ixzz19krVUhR0


Geez guys, don't mention this over at the DRT...it'll get them all worked up!
User IP Logged

Klatunictobarata
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #184 on: May 19th, 2010, 5:18pm »

on May 19th, 2010, 5:13pm, Klatunictobarata wrote:
Geez guys, don't mention this over at the DRT...it'll get them all worked up!


Sorry Guys...THEY ALREADY ARE!

User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #185 on: May 19th, 2010, 5:22pm »

Anniversary time so let the new sightings begin. rolleyes
What a sorry state of affairs. The animation (recreation) of Ted's story is amazing. And all this without even revealing the location. Unbelievable and from the world of Bizarro. embarassed
User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #186 on: May 19th, 2010, 5:39pm »

Right, Katt, and I wondered, how that sound would fit to the "dopefish eating the Ty-drone"-video.

But that Arthur-story still moves me. Especially, when I read this:

"In May of 2007, officers responded to a domestic disturbance call at the house and police were called again this past October. Both times, Arthur Reyes was ticketed for offensive physical attack. "

Source: http://cbs11tv.com/local/Colette.Reyes.Arthur.2.1358220.html

That was about the time, when I had contact with him. I also noticed, that Arthur's University-site was never updated again. So I think, his problems were noticed by someone.
User IP Logged

Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #187 on: May 19th, 2010, 6:01pm »

the link mentioned, physical, mental, and SPIRITUAL abuse..that part struck me as odd. Usually I see only the first two..The trial was supposed to have been in March, 2010 but those can get delayed up to end of year depending how busy the court is.

His logs never gave any hint of being disturbed or in conflict with the wife. in his dreams, just the fawning over Whitley..was what struck me..
and maybe one blowing up a ufo.

@Radi..yeah thats what drew me to him back then ..he was a great programmmer. knew about pilotless and self driven aircraft..had darpa grants...internationally known..had his own metal/steel business.(sold by that time).and into that zen stuff..mostly for martial arts..not any dark esoteric craft but he knew the lingo well with respect to chakras, and sacred geometries..Plugging Lindas books at the same time. Which, is why we wondered why Linda would cancel out..on the event of the milennium in July of 2007 and someone who would have helped boost her goods as well as drone story. As I recall..from Sidds very last correspondence on this issue..Reyes had said t, if i recall correctly, the interview went well prior to proposed airing...
Now we will never know..

But we know..if she did..she just never broadcast it., and he never contacted anyone back, and Noorey, Lindas Lap dog, blew off a caller to kingdom come on that anxiously awaited program. Lots and Lots were anticipating something big..(yet only one drone call made it thru the screening ?)after that..and contrived and hilarious drone appearances elsewhere ..things just took massive nosedive..with only Alienware using the design and later Warners/Fox in its series incorporating the craft design and referencing the story ..with Isaac being played by Abraham..



« Last Edit: May 19th, 2010, 6:24pm by Sysconfig » User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #188 on: May 19th, 2010, 6:20pm »

When I asked him about his mail to LMH this was his first response:

"I wrote the letter you reference. Linda Howe interviewed me on Monday. However I speak on my own, & not for my employer."

When I said, I had to laugh, because I thought that this could only mean he was part of a game, that I would like to join, he responded this:

"Even if the Isaac material is ultimately proven to be a hoax, I have a
feeling that there is still value in the language material, although I
am not certain exactly what. I would like to draft a plan of research
for examining it carefully. Would you like to participate in the
research?

Please note that I'm doing this on my own time & not for my employer."

And when I answered, okay, I am interested, he mailed this:

"OK. I'll send my first draft plan some time this week. "

It lasted a little longer, but some of you know the result.
At least Sys should, and I know, Dil did not forget, because this was the first time, he impressed me. And he impressed me again and again during those three years.

Sorry, Dill, had to praise you at that moment, I hope, this does not make you look as a suspect. grin

P.S.: This was not the whole correspondence with Arthur, but I always tried to keep things offline, when they were not relevant.
User IP Logged

Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #189 on: May 19th, 2010, 6:41pm »

Yes thats correct, and the other part aside the letters was a reference to plasma physics, which Sid checked with a physicist in Germany who in essence told him nothing there.

The Reyes Draft report is available..Doc might have one handy. I have to retrieve it from ATS,

Ahh heere it is
http://ovnis-usa.com/DIVERS/A-Reyes-CARET_Language_Research%20V00.pdf
if any here haven't seen it. I'm sure you all have I believe.As best I know no final was ever done..Leaving it clearly in domain of the esoteric/free energy/antigravity/crop circle and goverment conspiracy buffs which is where DRT is now with Ted....always has been if you look at it and Ovnis historical obsessions with that genre of speculation...

Back to Reyes..I am wondering how he, who taught meditation, and self control after school and or weekends, plus a class a model builder/enthusiast.. had the time to beat up his spouse, while also allegedly..busy online having an affair, and his schooll/profession..It sounds so surreal and incongruous. But truth can be stranger than fiction..
I intend on keeping up with that trial when it happens.

« Last Edit: May 19th, 2010, 7:12pm by Sysconfig » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #190 on: May 20th, 2010, 04:53am »

Wow... terrible tragedy. I know this drone saga has put a lot of strain (to say the least..) on a lot of peoples lives and relationships. I suppose what was fermenting can only be more severely tested.. In this case tragedy.
RIP

I never communicated with Reyes, that I remember, I just joined the group and downloaded everything I could. I considered his level of academic training and his interest in the nuts and bolts of this drone saga to be an interesting parallel.
User IP Logged

Marvin
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mmm, yes, very curious, very interesting....


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 1119
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #191 on: May 20th, 2010, 07:48am »

on May 19th, 2010, 6:41pm, Sysconfig wrote:
The Reyes Draft report is available..Doc might have one handy. I have to retrieve it from ATS,

Ahh heere it is
http://ovnis-usa.com/DIVERS/A-Reyes-CARET_Language_Research%20V00.pdf



I don’t know… octal switches, heavy state tri-switches, octal junctions and diffusers? I get it, they are just trying to see relative patterns and connections that relate to our understanding and knowledge. But isn’t the LAP basically acting as a Rorschach inkblot test? The vision is based on the viewer? One can see octal patterns… but then the tri-switches blow the octal based concept out of the water.

What ever happened to the “infinite diversity in infinite combinations” like statement by Isaac? Can one really portray this visually with a two dimensional line drawing? Proponents of the LAP will have us believe that it can be.

Personally, I have major issues with two dimensional line drawings representing (what was suggested to be) an infinite three dimensional holographic array. The LAP did not portray any infinite three dimensional holographic array type of concept… and it is a killer to the idea of the LAP being real.

There is no connection to any known physical evidence (like the Roswell characters or hieroglyphs). The LAP is simply art.

The idea of trying to keep “hope” alive with “cosmic speculations” is just absurd.


BTW: It is great to see some of the ole friends posting again... welcome back!

User IP Logged

Oh Goody! My Illudiom Pu-36 Explosive Space Modulator!

User Image

"You naughty earth specimens!"
Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #192 on: May 20th, 2010, 08:29am »

Greetz Marvin!
Yes the report is just a plug for Lindas crop circle books., some reserach using that as primary references.ATS..LoL..Master of the Key..whatever happened to him.
It seems the Reyes group never functioned as a group, I thought i read there were 4/5 members..But no one else has openly acknowledged being on that Reyes group or mentioned it during the great debates..other than Sid at ATS ., in fact ithere seemed to be a denial..like it was something just found in the wild...Yet it seems when Reyes told Sid he was mailing him what he had..it was over a week before Sid got something..So it seems either the rest of the group put that together without Sid, or Reyes had it ready at the time Sid comunicated with him and was just holding..till he got the ok from Whitley to do so.I don't see anything where any of the members acted together like a study group would normally function., much less do real analysis in the normal science traditon.or if work was parceled out only to certain members, or if the the members talked even with each other...hell of a research team...looks like they didnt..parcel out anything..to Tomi nor Sid, other than the above..Tomi mentions she downloaded what she could..but it must be I assume only this early draft..as far as we know and we are told.





« Last Edit: May 20th, 2010, 08:33am by Sysconfig » User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #193 on: May 20th, 2010, 09:25am »

Yes, that is what I remember getting from the archives I found there. But I don't remember that format and seeing something about a Jeanie in a chat room as noted in this copy.

Too many emails to cull through, need to weed a lot out and reduce bulk, but I rememeber writing to one of his academic contemporaries I found associated with him. I think the drone interest came as a bit of a shock to this friend of Reyes and I think academics have an extrodinary amount of peer pressure censorship driven into them to conform to "conventional wisdom" of peers.

This is what I sensed happened after I wrote to the fellow academic friend of Reyes..

I kinda went.. "ut ohhh" and tiptoed away..
then other events of investigation eclipsed this and only now do I remember how I might have embarassed Reyes by contacting his fellow academic collegue. tongue
And I'm too busy right now to find that email to the friend. But that's all I can add about the sitaution that I can remember, but it is of little import.
« Last Edit: May 20th, 2010, 09:30am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

SiddReader
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #194 on: May 20th, 2010, 11:41am »

Here is another part, I found very interesting:

"If the technology described in the CARET document excerpts is true, my
best guess is that it captures & manipulates naturally-occurring plasma.
Plasmas are really amazing. They have the ability to self-organize
persistent structures that resemble those found in biological cells,
according to a research team in a Romanian university.

I do not remember posting anything to Above Top Secret. However I did
reply to an e-mail message from an alumnus of my employer. He invited me
to join the discussions on ATS, but I declined. Maybe he posted my
reply."

I am still wondering today, who was that alumnus... rolleyes
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls