Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #11 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 14th, 2017, 12:51pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #11  (Read 17050 times)
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #525 on: Jun 28th, 2010, 7:18pm »

on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:14pm, Icarus99 wrote:
This must really be the Twilight Zone now. According to most I should know.

Not sure about that but you’re a long way from Kansas sweetheart. laugh
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #526 on: Jun 28th, 2010, 7:23pm »

on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:14pm, Icarus99 wrote:
This must really be the Twilight Zone now. According to most I should know.


Things could get worse... Which drone will you get on in 2012?
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #527 on: Jun 28th, 2010, 7:38pm »

No drone will be needed because the real year is 2023.
Excuse me just too funny, had to say it.

I expect nothing in 2012 except maybe the drones will have faded away.
User IP Logged

Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #528 on: Jun 28th, 2010, 11:29pm »

Dang you are good boy..
While I'm eatin my chicken franks and Pork n Beans...a delicacy here in the south..
Just thinkin.
That was in your gallery too..but the only folx I remember posting anything was that Bulgarian ex cohort of Atto..back at his ranch..which shifts locations like nthe desert sands..Cuchisni ,,lol.. can;t remember.how to spell his name...The one who had one hot daughter was a Ms State of Utah?..was quite emphatic about that doomsday scenario for that year..preached a lil bible..lil free energy.etc..but really went nowhere..I was wondering how he/she.. could capitalize when any investor would if he thought it out...the world will end! what good is free energy then? why not inlvest in a ship to take us ,,no ..THEM..they would never invite US..off the planet..same goes for George Noory..and his slew of Quetzo Quatle catastrophes..but making sure his contracts are on the up and up..OK with me,..we need a voice we can all trust on the radio during these hard times to come..

Now Wikipedia..
2023 (MMXXIII) will be a common year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ( I hate Gregorian chant)
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Predicted and scheduled events
* 2 In fiction
o 2.1 Computer and video games
o 2.2 Film
o 2.3 Television
o 2.4 Literature
* 3 References

[edit] Predicted and scheduled events

* [b]Slovenia will close down its only nuclear plant by this year.

* The Compact of Free Association between the United States and the Federated States of Micronesia and the Marshall Islands expires.
* Walt Disney's Steamboat Willie as well as two other Mickey Mouse short films released in 1928 fall into the public domain after their copyright expires.
OMG nooo..!


These are really Earth Shattering events..shocked

I hope they are not part of your new agenda..though there are a lot of possibilities with the Micky mouse thingy expiring..


I predict by 2023 we will no longer have to hear the cackling voice of LMH and and wimp y drones of Noory..as the new paradigm of enlightenment that began in 2012 continues to ravage the planet.

Will you be adding articles and such to the blog..and social commentary..It is a good platform..Why did you take the other one down..Marv asked the same thing..will you share what happened?
« Last Edit: Jun 29th, 2010, 12:23am by Sysconfig » User IP Logged

Marvin
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Mmm, yes, very curious, very interesting....


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 1119
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #529 on: Jun 29th, 2010, 07:38am »

on Jun 24th, 2010, 10:41pm, Icarus99 wrote:
The BB Drone is my personal favorite real or not.



on Jun 28th, 2010, 1:40pm, Icarus99 wrote:
Yes it must have been Ty\'s



There is no question as to the reality of the Ty photos. As discussed and demonstrated earlier, as with all of the California Drone photos, the lighting is not consistent with reality.

The only way I can get a “white sky” is when the sun is in front of the camera.

User Image
Notice the shadow on the train engine shows the Sun to be in front of the camera.

With Ty’s photo:

User Image
Notice the shadows on the trees to the left… which are consistent with my train photo above.

Let’s look a little closer at the Drone.

User Image
The sun is behind the camera (to the left) and not in front of the camera.

As you know, the sun can not be in two locations at the same time.

You can strike possible reality with the Ty photos… they are fake.


User IP Logged

Oh Goody! My Illudiom Pu-36 Explosive Space Modulator!

User Image

"You naughty earth specimens!"
CA519705950
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 587
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #530 on: Jun 29th, 2010, 08:39am »

I think there's just something about all of the drone photos that doesn't look right. Particularly the Ty set. I think they became more fake-looking as they went on.
User IP Logged

"Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist."
Epicurus.
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #531 on: Jun 29th, 2010, 09:31am »

I do not care if fake or not fake, I like the design. I also like the skinning of the model (?) and the little screens showing the Isaac designs. I also like the bare-bones aspect of a device that has no need of aerodynamics.
User IP Logged

Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #532 on: Jun 29th, 2010, 11:41am »

Marv
User Image

Its precisely why they didn't send this to a forensics photographer.or that University.or anyone..No one with any bonafide credential would ever certify that as real....forget DRT and their limited budget..certainly LMH had the resources...able to junket to UK and other parts on the flip of a coin..I am sure their inside people knew as well as professional contacts in the "industry" she is..i've said it over and over again.. as a producer herself..Certainly more concrete than a journalist..and people already told her and whitley ( from what Star Tor stated back in 2009.).If she didn't ask..well..How just how negligent and stupid can she get?
If laymen such as yourself Marv and Nev..and all those others kept pointing these problems..Yet She kept pushing it..and in a 2008 Email to me as enlightened seeker..said the BB drone is real!!
This is why this will always come back to haunt her..


I know you don't care if its real or not..IC ..yours is an aestheic perspective..something that doesnt belong there is there..interested only in what flows from that..Lindas is almost the same..only not aesthetics..its what buzzes commercially from that..but both want the buzz..the endless droning..The truth of the matter in both cases is only a minor ethical inconvenience..
Only one place I know of you that comes to mind in suspending disbelief..and that's a comic book..You have plenty of room to grow in there IC if you choose that route..its very lucrative..and don't have to worry about the verasimiltude (lol..did I spell that right Doc?)


Marv..great pix! and analysis..and putting into perspective..as well as back on track..
Thank you..



« Last Edit: Jun 29th, 2010, 12:01pm by Sysconfig » User IP Logged

CA519705950
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 587
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #533 on: Jun 29th, 2010, 3:27pm »

on Jun 29th, 2010, 09:31am, Icarus99 wrote:
I do not care if fake or not fake, I like the design. I also like the skinning of the model (?) and the little screens showing the Isaac designs. I also like the bare-bones aspect of a device that has no need of aerodynamics.


I agree that the designs and idea behind it are pretty amazing. But to me personally, if something like this really is real, I'd be far more excited than I am looking at it now.
I think the earlier images look pretty convincing, and the Isaac documents are convincing too. I'm still undecided about whether it's all real or not but after the limited time I've spent looking into the drones, there are more things that indicate fake than real. I just wish I was around here when it was 'all kicking off' - I presume there was quite a buzz surrounding the images. Must have been pretty exciting.
« Last Edit: Jun 29th, 2010, 3:28pm by CA519705950 » User IP Logged

"Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist."
Epicurus.
neveleeleven
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 227
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #534 on: Jun 29th, 2010, 3:30pm »

Good post Marv,

To me it is obvious that the creator of the BB drone was more concerned about having the "Isaac art" on the side of the drone visible than he was concerned about realism.

With such a bright sky, the drone itself should have been swallowed up by a type of "bloom effect" from the light, caused by the camera.

wikipedia bloom (shader effect)

http://harkal.sylphis3d.com/2006/05/20/how-to-do-good-bloom-for-hdr-rendering/

If the creator had been smart enough to include a bloom effect, it would have made the "Isaac art" very hard to see.

In fact, almost every single drone image that is showing characters on the drone seems to be specifically created to add emphasis to the characters. It seems they wanted people to focus on and notice the characters, even if that meant ignoring laws of light (huge mistake).

...

I think the hoaxers biggest mistake was being obsessed with Biblical / mythical names.
« Last Edit: Jun 29th, 2010, 3:33pm by neveleeleven » User IP Logged

Romans 12:6
masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #535 on: Jun 29th, 2010, 4:18pm »

Interesting remarks CA5. I doubt anything like it happens again. The internet will make it impossible.
User IP Logged

Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #536 on: Jun 30th, 2010, 12:23am »

on Jun 29th, 2010, 4:18pm, Icarus99 wrote:
Interesting remarks CA5. I doubt anything like it happens again. The internet will make it impossible.


Not like it perhaps..but the mind floating on all that substrate grey matter can think and jettison something else and the internet is the ideal place to put a stink bomb and run..This one had a tad more ponash..and the crew behind it had more than the usual 2 neurons firing...but like the odiferous big O
..first one smelt it dealt it..! There may be wisdom in those words..but I have always noted..that when you swat one fly..a hundred come to its funeral..

Like the similar shape in xmen..and matrix..just another ,,and no doubt unique application of one concept...the designs are on thousands of laptop--albeit-- they are not floating as as Isaac said they would..like magic.. .but scattered across the globe. with perhaps a 1/3 not working right..like a lot of other toys...Warners fox in an odd corporate precedent used the craft designs and story..for their terminator series..

Like the former , it will always survive in flights of fancy..until something else comes up. Just don't do like the movie maker Ed Wood guy..used the old standby tentacles... for shock and awe..which today will get you mostly giggles and wiggles...
Reminded me of the Brazil copycat which..is even the main attraction at the Todd caret site..The site that promised to become the premier site that would separate lol..the Chaff from the wheat. as far as the Drones went...(even the cliche; is hackneyed) I think they watched too many re runs of Field of dreams..They built it..but nobody came..


.Sits there like an obscene and naked popsicle frozen in time...The video and the site failed miserably ..to resonate and amplify..and so did the stories of tentacles mating with wind turbines in Europe..seems a lot of people liked the design. So despite the minor setback..here and there to and fro..You should be proud.even swooning...IC..By the way..just what do you want us to call you now?

@cas welcome aboard Cas..you came at a good time to see one of the creators..but yes the early days were ruff and tumble..like one big food fight..but perhaps the most comprehensive Unbiased..Objective ( is that a redundancy?) info ...is at ..
. Yo Dawgz ! Lay it on me one more time WWW.Dronehoax.com
grin
« Last Edit: Jun 30th, 2010, 01:21am by Sysconfig » User IP Logged

Nodnunk
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

The number e is irrational


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 164
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #537 on: Jun 30th, 2010, 07:02am »

I would take issue with the sun's position in Marvin's Durango and Silverton photo. First, there are no clear cut shadows that I can see. Second, the illumination on the side of the engine, tender and box car are bright enough so that the lettering is easily seen. Therefore I would put the sun above and to the left of the photographer, not in the direction the camera is looking.

As for the drone photo, I agree with Marvin's arrows, the illumination is from above and to the left. I would say that that is consistent with the trees on the right of the image. But since the "high resolution" scan of the image cropped the trees, it is impossible to say for sure. If LMH ever releases high resolution scans of all the photos, it is important that they not be cropped. The trees need to be in the images.
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #538 on: Jun 30th, 2010, 12:03pm »

By all means do not crop out the trees. At present I am experimenting with High Dynamic Range Images and Image based lighting. My oh my what they have in store for perceived reality.
User IP Logged

Katterfelto
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #539 on: Jun 30th, 2010, 12:20pm »

on Jun 30th, 2010, 12:03pm, Icarus99 wrote:
By all means do not crop out the trees. At present I am experimenting with High Dynamic Range Images and Image based lighting. My oh my what they have in store for perceived reality.

And all this to provide a realistic image on paper, film or screen. Pointless at this stage anyway. It will cast suspicion on most witness submissions and require (hopefully rolleyes )higher standards. May not be a bad thing at all.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls