Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #11 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 23rd, 2017, 7:11pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #11  (Read 147220 times)
CA519705950
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 587
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #615 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 04:11am »

Quote:
No way Mocking bro.I'm assuming you are male per the info at the GB site..
http://gbatemp.net/index.php?showuser=134396
and the comments referred to there..It was fun reading! Though some stuff has to be left under the cover and not mentioned here..its a totally legit and appropriate there..

Ah, I see... sorry that I misinterpreted.
Yeah, the problem with using distinctive usernames is that it leaves a huge online trail for PIs to pick up and snoop on. It's something I've considered before but haven't been bothered by it... it's all a part of my character I suppose. Google is a powerful tool and I'm glad to see someone has the initiative to use it.
Haha, yeah... GBAtemp is pretty lenient when it comes to rules. As long as you're posting in 'The Edge of the Forum'
- the spam zone - then you're pretty much good to post whatever as long as there are no vulgar pictures or abuse to staff members. It's a good site, but if you're looking for serious discussion, GBAtemp isn't the place to be unless you only want serious discussion about consoles. It's good to be on UFO Casebook since people here are mature and you can have a good conversation or debate. I've been told by several people that I'm 'old headed' and while that's true, I'm not a 'super serious' person. Just like anyone I have a silly streak and enjoy immature or crude humour... but my sense of humour is strange and a lot of the time, I take it seriously when people joke around me which isn't to great.
As for my gaming 'hobbie' - it's one of the first interests I developed. I had an N64 when I was two or four or something and we never really bought many games for it, being a not-so-rich family. I played Super Mario 64 on the N64 up until I was like 8, so I spent around 4-6 years playing the game. It was only when I was 8 that I realised I had to get the stars, and that was when I completed it. I spent all my time before that running around aimlessly, collecting coins and stuff. It was good fun, that game is still my favourite game of all time. I pretty much know it inside out.
I like games because of the atmosphere. I've always thought that I can feel atmosphere more than others... well, 'feel' isn't the right word, but I can appreciate it more. People I know don't appreciate it, don't even take notice of it. Games like Resident Evil and Mario have a lot of atmosphere which is why I love them... same goes for my music tastes - I like any music that creates an atmosphere.
Modern-day games just don't cut it for atmosphere. Occasionally you get one or two, like new Resident Evils or something, but generally, new games aren't good like that.

Quote:
and nothing wrong posting a female avatar..lol..i've done it a myriad times...I mean that seriously..And I love Gilian Anderson too!

I have a female in my avatar (Kirsten Dunst) because she's pretty. I was going to use a different avatar originally but none were the right size so I just used a random one. Haha, yeah, Gillian Anderson is a hottie. Especially in The X-Files... I've got a thing for redheads.

Quote:
I/m merely telling Klatt you are highly intelligent and know what the scoop is when it comes understanding whats phony,at least from your objectivity demonstrated at that site.. whats real.. whats a good game whats a decent product..as per your posts at GBtemp//thats all..and shouldn''t let your age be an obstacle here..No one's belittling you..What I said was to enlighten the others not familiar with your background..what little there is....and not wishing to hold hands..I can assure them right here and now..you hardly need that..

Ah, I understand. I can't say I'm a genius... academically, literacy, humanities and languages (like History, Religious Studies, French etc.) are my strengths, but when it comes down to things like Science and Maths, I really do have a hard time learning. The reason for that is because I'm an 'understanding' person - to remember and be good at something, I have to understand it. Like in History, I know why WWII started because I have an understanding into it. Whereas in Maths, we're given formulae to use and just told to remember it, without understanding why we have to use it, and that puzzles me.

Quote:
We have quite a few that came as trolls.Even a hermit the frog...lol...posted weird temp backgrounds to give shallow history..you know what I mean..I certainly don't think you fall in that category..
You can take that to the bank..although nowadays we have to be choosy which one.

Hm, I can see this forum getting a lot of trolling. It's unfortunate but you just don't feed them lol. I'm certainly not here to troll and I'm sorry if anyone feels that I am or already have. I'm here to discuss and learn about one of my interests.

Quote:
and thanx for explaining the From age cheese thing ..The play on words was simply delightful....simply delightful..! I can tell you have a promising future ahead of you! I bet no one at your blog site has been able to figure that out either. And a double Duh on me ca5 should be CAS ? xfikes cas just curious..

Nope, it should be Cee-Ay-Five-One-Nine-Seven-Zero-Five-Nine-Five-O... that's what Dana reads out over the telephone.

Quote:
Xfiles wolverines.feral wolverine...lol..I wish I had that stuff growing up..You really do have a deep and rich experience in the Best of sci fi. (arggh...Sy Fy now)
Did you know SCC was allegedly a tribute not to the drones but to Xfiles Chris Carter? You could hardly tell..but I do miss Scc and Summer Glau..and that delicious Ms Weaver..

Haha, my FeralWolverine Photobucket account goes back years. I think I set it up when I was 12 or something. I've used so many usernames in the past it's unreal. I'm sticking to this one now though, I feel content with it.
I've always like superheroes, specifically Marvel characters. Spider-Man was always my favourite followed closely by X-Men. The Spider-Man movies were great... well, the first two. I think Kirsten Dunst was the first woman I'd ever looked at and thought was hot. It's a shame that they're remaking the Spider-Man films and using a new cast... I don't think anyone will make Mary Jane look cuter or hotter than Kirsten did.
No I didn't know that, it's pretty interesting. Unfortunately I've not watched SCC, though I'd like to one day. Summer Glau isn't really my type but she's kind of cute wink.

Quote:
Say..will you be shooting off firewoks over the weekend holiday ? Now you handle them carefully son.. .I had some roman candles blow up right in my face..always warn folx and their youngins to be careful..

In Peace
Sys

Uh, nope. Why would I hehe? Is it a celebration weekend or something? smiley.
User IP Logged

"Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist."
Epicurus.
Sysconfig
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #616 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 04:59am »

Its the day the UK got rid of those annoying..colonial welfare..dependents from the Empire..Booted them..Right out the house!!
Independence day! ..Surely a cause for celebration over there! hehe..I am curious..How is that history interpreted over there>
If you watch all the old Japanese monster movies.Godzilla..(the original yes..sequels no..)Rodan..Mothra..Mysterians..lol there is never a US military...barely a mention of the us..None of their monsters would have lasted 10 minutes..Had we been scripted in..
I'm sure for the Russians they won the war..say..Why would should you be worried about PIs..
I tell You if the LMH and C2c Vetted their guests.Half the crap floating online ..like this hoax was..would not be..period. Imagine all that extra bandwith available..

It would be nice if we had anti pollution clean airwaves act..something holding entertainers more accountable..Thats just me. I like mostly trance type music..stuff like by Tangerine Dream..like they did in the movie the Keep..
Thanx for understanding also..

« Last Edit: Jul 3rd, 2010, 05:06am by Sysconfig » User IP Logged

Gort
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 0
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #617 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 07:06am »

Came across this. Its a new one for me. Unless I missed it the drones were not on their famous hoax list?

http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2010/07/why-do-people-join-cults/
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #618 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 08:11am »

on Jul 3rd, 2010, 04:11am, CA519705950 wrote:
Ah, I see... sorry that I misinterpreted.
Yeah, the problem with using distinctive usernames is that it leaves a huge online trail for PIs to pick up and snoop on. It's something I've considered before but haven't been bothered by it... it's all a part of my character I suppose. Google is a powerful tool and I'm glad to see someone has the initiative to use it.

<snip>

Meh, just do what I do and go for overkill….. (45,000 + and counting!!)


Cheers. grin
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #619 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 08:45am »

on Jul 3rd, 2010, 07:06am, Gort wrote:
Came across this. Its a new one for me. Unless I missed it the drones were not on their famous hoax list?

http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2010/07/why-do-people-join-cults/

Hi Gort,

I was just reading Jake Reason's response(ish laugh) over at OM.

What famous hoax list?

That’s an article about Cults isn’t it?

They were amongst the first to specifically question the ridiculous nature of the Drones & the anonymous witnesses and also published Colin Bennett’s article which was wrote exclusively about the Drone-hoax (i.e. being an internet meme).


Cheers. smiley
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Gort
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 0
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #620 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 09:28am »

on Jul 3rd, 2010, 08:45am, DrDil wrote:
Hi Gort,

I was just reading Jake Reason's response(ish laugh) over at OM.

What famous hoax list?

That’s an article about Cults isn’t it?

They were amongst the first to specifically question the ridiculous nature of the Drones & the anonymous witnesses and also published Colin Bennett’s article which was wrote exclusively about the Drone-hoax (i.e. being an internet meme).


Cheers. smiley


Its more than just cults.

they have a forum

http://www.realityuncovered.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=14&sid=46d5e3025677c5095ee064e4bf521737


Sure has om stirred up, like someone sticking a bees nest.
User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #621 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 10:55am »

on Jul 3rd, 2010, 09:28am, Gort wrote:
Its more than just cults.

they have a forum

http://www.realityuncovered.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=14&sid=46d5e3025677c5095ee064e4bf521737


Sure has om stirred up, like someone sticking a bees nest.

Hi again Gort,

Oh I know, I’ve been posting on this topic at OM and I’m also a member (lurk mode) of the RU forum you linked to as well as AMKON where until recently Murnut was exclusively offering his retorts to the OM staff and a couple of persistent members who were/are advocates of the Source A personna (since Mur was banned a while ago). In fact I had several posts on the last three pages of the 300+ page thread at OM which they nuked a few hours ago (and then locked the thread).

There’s a thread on it here and where I posted the following a while ago (and which references OM in a less than friendly fashion):

on May 22nd, 2010, 07:15am, DrDil wrote:
==================
==================

Ufology Exopolitics Special: Source A Exposed!

Hold the Pickles and the Special Source

What is Source A?

(May 20, 2010)

"Source A” is allegedly an active-duty officer in the United States Navy with a long and illustrious career, spanning nearly 40 years at sea. Nothing remarkable about that, surely? Well, as soon as you factor in the information that this particular individual liaises with Extra Terrestrial races on behalf of the UN, his career suddenly takes on a much more remarkable angle. The aforementioned ET’s allegedly have a direct political involvement in our (human) affairs, but damn, I don’t remember voting reptilian!

The fantastical story as told by “Source A” is a huge hit amongst the Exopolitical crowd, for obvious reasons. One would be forgiven for thinking that this particular story couldn’t have come along at a better time for people like Salla, Greer, Webre, Komarek et al. Two previously little known individuals, brothers by the names of Clay and Shawn Pickering, are solely to thank for catapulting this story onto an unsuspecting public in early 2008 and they have been keeping us updated ever since. Their unflinching devotion to the message is a credit to their stamina and willpower. The many obvious flaws in the story have been pointed out to them countless times, yet still they remain, still they continue. They have of course been helped by the venue they have chosen to promote this exopolitical wet dream; the “Open Minds” forum.

The Open Minds forum is well known throughout the ufological community as a place for fantasists and would-be-hoaxers to peddle their wares in comfort and without fear of reprisal. Many of those OM members who have cried foul at the Pickering’s claims, have found themselves summarily suspended and in some cases permanently banned for their troubles.

How fitting then, that it would be there that the significant first nail in the coffin of the Source A “disclosure” would be hammered home. They just didn’t know it yet.


Article continues at RealityUncovered

==================
==================



(Kudos to Jed, Mur et al!!
User Image)


However I was specifically referring to your quote where you mentioned a ‘hoax list’ or more precisely the lacking of any Drone accolades, this is why I said the page you linked to was _only_ “an article about cults” as I was in fact only referring to that page.

I was aware of their other activities and sections of the website.


Cheers. smiley
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
Gort
New Member
Image


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 0
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #622 on: Jul 3rd, 2010, 11:37am »

Thanks for the info - we see it again and again


I liked this comment

"One can only hope the birthday girl did humanity a favour and threw away the key……….."
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #623 on: Jul 4th, 2010, 04:42am »

Wow is all I can say.. :
http://www.serpo.info/

See, I had no idea at all of this background everyone has over at ATS and OM and RU. No wonder everyone is the way they are now accusing others and looking for motives of deception etc. in the drone saga, etc.

What I still can't make out though.. Was there any real CIA involvement that was of any real substance?

Just thinking, it seemed ripe to throw the drone saga out into that mix in the middle of 2007. Looking back now, I'm wondering if some group targeted this community because it was ripe for maximum play based on the production already in full swing wrt the serpo story.

I never got interested in knowing too much about serpo, to me, after reading one of those releases that contained a brief to Regan, I thought to myself.. this is really really bad fiction.. Why is everyone so caught up in this?

But now, what confuses me is why there has to be hard feelings about these 5 people who were with RU and the admins at OM? Everyone got deceived, right?

Is it because of tactics used? Well I would say that if people are seeking the truth, than that is where these deceptions originated, not from malice. Malice comes from the original deceptors, and it seems that they are the people who get excuses made for them, because their "smiling faces, etc." instill strong beliefs, which then becomes the motivating factor driving the division when all should be seeking the truth for themselves.

Nobody has a blue print for life, we learn as we go along. Maybe it is time for everyone to stop having enemies and look harder at the integrity of people who instigated these beliefs to begin with.

I can see now why people thought the DRT or the PI's were suspect, I know the truth and say it since I was there at the inception of it and suggesed getting the PI's to begin with, it was just a group of us trying to solve the drone case. Now, after reading this serpo link, I know why people don't believe the obvious truth I suppose..

Too seasoned in deception by the previous experience.
If I sound naive so be it. Prior deception however is no excuse for not seeing the truth when it does come.

On the other hand, IMO, when witnesses or people like Icarus or VC come into the mix, we need to keep the door open and welcome whatever insight we can get.
« Last Edit: Jul 4th, 2010, 05:15am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #624 on: Jul 4th, 2010, 05:43am »

on Jul 4th, 2010, 04:42am, tomi01uk wrote:
Wow is all I can say.. :
http://www.serpo.info/

See, I had no idea at all of this background everyone has over at ATS and OM and RU. No wonder everyone is the way they are now accusing others and looking for motives of deception etc. in the drone saga, etc.

What I still can't make out though.. Was there any real CIA involvement that was of any real substance?

Just thinking, it seemed ripe to throw the drone saga out into that mix in the middle of 2007. Looking back now, I'm wondering if some group targeted this community because it was ripe for maximum play based on the production already in full swing wrt the serpo story.

I never got interested in knowing too much about serpo, to me, after reading one of those releases that contained a brief to Regan, I thought to myself.. this is really really bad fiction.. Why is everyone so caught up in this?

But now, what confuses me is why there has to be hard feelings about these 5 people who were with RU and the admins at OM? Everyone got deceived, right?

Is it because of tactics used? Well I would say that if people are seeking the truth, than that is where these deceptions originated, not from malice. Malice comes from the original deceptors, and it seems that they are the people who get excuses made for them, because their "smiling faces, etc." instill strong beliefs, which then becomes the motivating factor driving the division when all should be seeking the truth for themselves.

Nobody has a blue print for life, we learn as we go along. Maybe it is time for everyone to stop having enemies and look harder at the integrity of people who instigated these beliefs to begin with.

I can see now why people thought the DRT or the PI's were suspect, I know the truth and say it since I was there at the inception of it and suggesed getting the PI's to begin with, it was just a group of us trying to solve the drone case. Now, after reading this serpo link, I know why people don't believe the obvious truth I suppose..

Too seasoned in deception by the previous experience.
If I sound naive so be it. Prior deception however is no excuse for not seeing the truth when it does come.

On the other hand, IMO, when witnesses or people like Icarus or VC come into the mix, we need to keep the door open and welcome whatever insight we can get.

Hi Tomi,

Yeah, first SERPO then the Drones and now Source A……

Whether it’s OMF, BOT, RU, AMKON, ATS or here at UFOCB I believe you have to ask yourself what’s the common denominator? Or a more revealing line of questioning may be at what point when does allowing someone a public platform to voice their claims become actively sponsoring disinformation and/or a hoax being perpetrated on the very community I/you/we/us/them claim to be a part of?

Perhaps the tipping point is when you start banning and censoring dissenting points of view?

“Fool me once, fool on you,
Fool me twice, fool on me.”


But fool me three times and counting?

One would hope that even the most trusting of persons would have to step back and see the ‘bigger picture’ (as it were!! kiss) And after doing so the natural progression would surely be to ask yourself where are the few places than any of these claims are are lent any credence whatsoever (never mind still attaching ANY importance to ALL of them)?

I’m not criticising any groups or websites here but merely sharing what I believe is the main bone of contention behind all of the bad blood that you allude to and which I agree was first highlighted and dragged into the public eye with the SERPO story.

And as for being ‘too seasoned by deception’ that’s hardly the point or even a valid observation is it?

What’s the difference between that and being experienced in recognising an obvious deception? I don't look for signs of deception but if I see them I won't/don't pretend that it's just not there.

And as for the characters you mention, well, if they had at any juncture prior to the Drone release even hinted at their involvement in anything remotely related then you may have a point.

But for them all to inject themselves (i.e. by their own hand) into the unfolding drama after the original release and in my opinion none of them doing so convincingly (or with any corroborative evidence at all)?

Well, whilst perhaps anyone who thinks they are acting in good faith may not necessarily be naďve per se, I would certainly say that they are far too trusting and perhaps even to the point of being wilfully naďve…..


Cheers. smiley
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #625 on: Jul 4th, 2010, 06:13am »

Hi DrDil, You have lost me a bit here, and I imagine I'm not the only one without enough background, so if it doesn't stir up any hornets nests could you explain a bit more of what I will ask below:

Quote:
And as for being ‘too seasoned by deception’ that’s hardly the point or even a valid observation is it?



What I meant above was the exposure to deception made everyone seasoned to expect deception from all quarters.

Quote:
What’s the difference between that and being experienced in recognising an obvious deception? I don't look for signs of deception but if I see them I won't/don't pretend that it's just not there.



And justly so IMO.

Quote:
And as for the characters you mention, well, if they had at any juncture prior to the Drone release even hinted at their involvement in anything remotely related then you may have a point.



Here is where I'm confused. I was speaking about those who were listed in that link above who are associated with RU now. I don't think they have any interest in the drone saga. And I sure wouldn't expect them to have instigated it. But you never did say to my question was there any real substance behind the CIA links in that story. I mean real substance... where did that serpo story originate from? A bunch of lackeys with loose gov connections wannabee's I would guess but hardly a serious IC operation is my best guess. If they were involved at all.. which I doubt.

Quote:


But for them all to inject themselves (i.e. by their own hand) into the unfolding drama after the original release and in my opinion none of them doing so convincingly (or with any corroborative evidence at all)?



Still confused here. Sorry.

Quote:
Well, whilst perhaps anyone who thinks they are acting in good faith may not necessarily be naďve per se, I would certainly say that they are far too trusting and perhaps even to the point of being wilfully naďve…..


Cheers. smiley


If you mean those who are suspending their critical judgement in lieu of a belief that supports the Source A sources and the IC fall back plan.... then yes .. I agree. If that is what you meant. That is what I meant by "smiling faces" and the video. I mean come on guys.. gonna speak frankly here... But that Pickering really laid it on thick about that lunchen.. doesn't that tell anybody something is smelly in Pittsburg.. wink
« Last Edit: Jul 4th, 2010, 06:20am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #626 on: Jul 4th, 2010, 06:20am »

Hi Tomi,

The only characters I was referencing were those you mentioned by name.

How many others do you know of who have tried to inject themselves into the Drone proceedings if not Lev & the 'IA boys'?


Cheers.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #627 on: Jul 4th, 2010, 06:25am »

on Jul 4th, 2010, 06:20am, DrDil wrote:
Hi Tomi,

The only characters I was referencing were those you mentioned by name.

How many others do you know of who have tried to inject themselves into the Drone proceedings if not Lev & the 'IA boys'?


Cheers.


Sorry, still not understanding what it is you mean. But I suppose those who are interested in the drone saga were contaminated by the previous deceptions that then got transferred to the motives of pure inquiry and group/self discovery still in place now with the drone saga.

« Last Edit: Jul 4th, 2010, 06:27am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #628 on: Jul 4th, 2010, 06:34am »

on Jul 4th, 2010, 06:25am, tomi01uk wrote:
Sorry, still not understanding what it is you mean. But I suppose those who are interested in the drone saga were contaminated by the previous deceptions that then got transferred to the motives of pure inquiry and group/self discovery still in place now with the drone saga.


Forget all about SERPO, Source A & the other websites, I was merely echoing your acknowledgement of why the fierce rivalry exists.

I was specifically talking about your following sentence:

User Image


THESE ARE THE CHARACTERS, and as I said, the only two you named.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3940
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #629 on: Jul 4th, 2010, 06:34am »

Ok I understand now what you were saying. Sorry for the confusion. Re the drone saga, it is a masterpiece that enables a wide range of speculation. With no tangibles in human form yet. So wide ranging in speculation that IMO wheels within wheels could be behind this and I don't rule anyone out yet except Kermit.

But I do try to keep an eye on ppl who came in after its debut and have kept close ever since and seem to have no inquisitive motive for being here smiley

Just found this: What a rabbit hole..
http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/2009/03/

I guess the drones are a continuation of that "philosophy" of back engineering etc.. and if there is some elite group engineering this (wild speculation?) being circulated out into the forums, the drones was either a gift from them or a gift to them.
« Last Edit: Jul 4th, 2010, 07:04am by tommi01 » User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls