Board Logo
« Drone Discussion #11 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Oct 23rd, 2017, 11:09pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: Drone Discussion #11  (Read 2968 times)
MrsPlimpkin
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #975 on: Nov 15th, 2010, 03:13am »

on Nov 13th, 2010, 8:27pm, Isaac22 wrote:
Yes, Sir, the Drones never happened. And the Scotch you got from me was Glenfiddich. Cheers, Sir. I suggest a smoother distillate for cleaning your medals, as they might be damaged by this.

http://www.glenfiddich.com/lda.html?redirect=/index.html


A Salute and Toast to you sir as well, and I must say I look happily to ordering some of that.
Looks intriguing and just what I need for my flu too, and a very good nights sleep. smiley
« Last Edit: Nov 15th, 2010, 03:14am by MrsPlimpkin » User IP Logged

MrsPlimpkin
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #976 on: Nov 15th, 2010, 03:18am »

I was about to update some information on sightings, when I ran across this at the Nuforc.org site.
Nuforc is an invaluable source of data for all of us.
UPDATE: NUFORC has received a number of queries as to why we have not updated the website since August 30th. We apologize for the delay, and expect to have the site updated within the next several days. We apologize for the delay, which is due to five out-of-town trips, over the last two months. Also, the high volume of foolish, prank calls is beginning to take its toll on our operation, reducing our ability to handle the increased volume of reports that are being submitted. We apologize for the delay!

POSTED: November 06, 2010, by Peter Davenport, Director

That is very disturbing news.
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #977 on: Nov 15th, 2010, 07:54am »

After 32 years in the Seattle area, the National UFO Reporting Center is moving to a new locale in eastern Washington, a decommissioned U. S. Air Force ICBM missile base, located between the towns of Davenport and Harrington, WA, in Lincoln County. NUFORC: National UFO Reporting Center, for us who did not know. I must admit the former seems a little strange sys.
User IP Logged

Kattradamus
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #978 on: Dec 4th, 2010, 4:44pm »

Hey, does anyone know why the PACL Report cover has holes yet the following pages do not? Then the LAP and inventory pages have holes. But they do not line up.

Strange but I'm sure that has been beaten to death. Just a recent curious observation at least to me.
User IP Logged

Klatunictobarata
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #979 on: Dec 4th, 2010, 6:52pm »

on Dec 4th, 2010, 4:44pm, Kattradamus wrote:
Hey, does anyone know why the PACL Report cover has holes yet the following pages do not? Then the LAP and inventory pages have holes. But they do not line up.

Strange but I'm sure that has been beaten to death. Just a recent curious observation at least to me.

____________________________________

Could you give us a link to the same pages you are referencing to?

Just to be consistent with our sources, tis all...
User IP Logged

Kattradamus
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #980 on: Dec 7th, 2010, 9:17pm »

Just curious, probably nothing and already discussed. If so please point where.

User Image
User IP Logged

Klatunictobarata
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #981 on: Dec 8th, 2010, 6:28pm »

Finally, the good Folk over at that other place are possibly starting up their own humor thread:

"I'm not sure how the "hi-res" photos could help, except to make things more fun."

- onthefence


Maybee?
User IP Logged

Kattradamus
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #982 on: Dec 8th, 2010, 7:21pm »

The secret Hi-Res images will not help the reality theory. They will just point out more inconsistencies or a stalemate. So no one really wants them released beyond the initial wow factor.

BTW, I wonder what LMH's recent opinions are and how her independent research into the drones is going.

It is amazing how a different perspective is gained by masking, cropping and zooming the material for pasting into what can be considered unsophisticated humor.

One sometimes has to make their own fun.
User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #983 on: Dec 8th, 2010, 8:14pm »

This thing is sooo dead. LOL
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #984 on: Dec 8th, 2010, 8:38pm »

on Dec 8th, 2010, 8:14pm, xissix wrote:
This thing is sooo dead. LOL


No it's not, it's an Anthology.

http://hermetic.com/bey/

So.. what do think about these writings? http://hermetic.com/bey/ how this thinking figures into the bigger picture?
User IP Logged

Kattradamus
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #985 on: Dec 8th, 2010, 8:48pm »

The patient is on life support and deserves the best care money can buy. We need a signed death certificate from an acknowledged expert in UFOlogy before this saga is put in the body bag.
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #986 on: Dec 9th, 2010, 04:22am »

on Dec 8th, 2010, 8:48pm, Kattradamus wrote:
The patient is on life support and deserves the best care money can buy. We need a signed death certificate from an acknowledged expert in UFOlogy before this saga is put in the body bag.


ok ok... then we can start the Anthology?
User IP Logged

Kattradamus
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #987 on: Dec 9th, 2010, 06:22am »

I thought the Anthology already in existence. That should be the easy part. Finding the UFOlogy expert is another matter. laugh

I may be wrong, but I'm getting that strange feeling that interest in the drones is a tad off the peak during its heyday. I wonder why?
User IP Logged

tommi01
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 3955
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #988 on: Dec 9th, 2010, 12:01pm »

on Dec 9th, 2010, 06:22am, Kattradamus wrote:
I thought the Anthology already in existence. That should be the easy part. Finding the UFOlogy expert is another matter. laugh

I may be wrong, but I'm getting that strange feeling that interest in the drones is a tad off the peak during its heyday. I wonder why?


They are waiting for the ominibus?
Besides .. how could we ever leave the care and feeding of Lev to just strangers? wink



« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2010, 12:02pm by tommi01 » User IP Logged

masker33
Guest
xx Re: Drone Discussion #11
« Reply #989 on: Dec 9th, 2010, 1:59pm »

Dead, in the body bag, in the morgue and destined for an unmarked grave. Exactly what was wanted. Success and I suggest you believe it.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 64 65 66 67 68  ...  100 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls