Board Logo
« Political ET »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 14th, 2017, 2:54pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21  ...  29 Notify Send Topic Print
 veryhotthread  Author  Topic: Political ET  (Read 55979 times)
icepick
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 5931
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #270 on: May 14th, 2012, 12:50pm »

Yes Sys, we are going to be heard no matter what now. Our oldest radio signals are nearly 100 light years out there and continuing on. That covers a fair number of star systems, does it not?

But we just might have the benefit of being difficult to spot. Scientists think that our model here on Earth is probably a major oddity for advanced life. Without our moon, life on this rock would probably be pretty simple. And by every law on the books, a moon the size of ours should neither be this close to the center of a solar system, nor orbiting a planet just four times larger than it is.

The most common model for life like ours is probably on the moons of gas giants which are in the habitable zone of their solar system. That would satisfy the tidal requirements for an environment stable enough to support advanced life.

In other words, we may be hiding in plain sight here. Many extraterrestrial races might ignore this system altogether, because it doesn't match the primary model.

However, we are now making so much noise that such a scenario won't hold for long. Best get to work on the deflector shields, Phasers, and Photon Torpedos just in case. Same old story, better safe than sorry.

And a silent prayer for all our ETs to be benevolent. laugh
User IP Logged

GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 591
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #271 on: May 16th, 2012, 6:20pm »



A good collection in 2012. It shows NASA being very active in space.

G
User IP Logged

GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 591
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #272 on: May 30th, 2012, 8:59pm »

Ships around Earth is very interesting as this vid will show a ship transforming from small to large or more likely could be a side view turning to a top view in space.



Only time will tell unfortunately.

G
« Last Edit: May 30th, 2012, 9:03pm by GusB » User IP Logged

drwu23
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 6592
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #273 on: May 30th, 2012, 11:30pm »

Interesting that this guy can capture ET craft with his homemade telescopes when thousands of astronomers globally both pros and amateurs seem to be unable to see these things and take the same pics.
And one wonders why so many people think the ufo field is bogus and full of hoaxers and fools.

rolleyes
User IP Logged

icepick
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 5931
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #274 on: May 31st, 2012, 01:37am »

These things only serve to block investigation into places where it is needed. Regarding the past as much or more than the present or future.
User IP Logged

GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 591
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #275 on: May 31st, 2012, 03:00am »

on May 30th, 2012, 11:30pm, drwu23 wrote:
Interesting that this guy can capture ET craft with his homemade telescopes when thousands of astronomers globally both pros and amateurs seem to be unable to see these things and take the same pics.
And one wonders why so many people think the ufo field is bogus and full of hoaxers and fools.

rolleyes


Yes shouldn't MUFON be looking into this or even BJ who owns this forum?

G
User IP Logged

drwu23
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 6592
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #276 on: May 31st, 2012, 10:18am »

on May 31st, 2012, 03:00am, GusB wrote:
Yes shouldn't MUFON be looking into this or even BJ who owns this forum?

G


I wouldn't trust MUFON to find their car keys under the street lamp and I don't know enough about BJ.
My point is that if this guy can do this then where are all the other astronomers about this who take pics all the time day in and day out?
Is it possible that this guy is a hoaxer or taking pictures that are just out of focus artifacts?
User IP Logged

Erno86
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3061
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #277 on: May 31st, 2012, 4:48pm »

Based on my own other-worlder Foofighter sighting, back one night, approx. 40 miles west of Washington D.C., in Nov., 1976 --- I was coming home to Maryland in a full windowed Ford van, on a divided highway after we completed a survey expedition; after staking out a railroad track to a coal strip mine in West Virginia.

I would tend to say that most other-worlder starship sighting's --- only last about: 1 to 5 seconds of duration to the witness, unless the object is hovering or has landed; which is few and far between. This duration, for the majority of people, is way too fast for the witness to whip out a camera and take a picture. The other-worlder's...do not want to act like sitting-ducks, waiting for someone to take a pot-shot at one of there starship's --- that's for sure.

« Last Edit: May 31st, 2012, 5:06pm by Erno86 » User IP Logged

"It would be unsatisfactory, in my opinion, if a world without matter were possible."

Albert Einstein
icepick
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 5931
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #278 on: May 31st, 2012, 7:39pm »

As if they would have anything to fear Erno. Besides, we have miles of film of the Foo Fighters. Literally. Everytime a fighter pilot arms their weapons, the cameras roll. And many pilots tried to shoot one down during WWII, but only one B-29 gunner succeeded.

If you want to see video of bona fide UFOs, head for the old War Department Archives and scoff these hoaxsters. I believe Wu's point is something along these lines. And mine is that we have all kinds of video available, but not one of these jokers is screaming to see it. Why not?
User IP Logged

Skeptical
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 586
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #279 on: Jun 1st, 2012, 10:34am »

Ice - have you ever seen any original source material regarding the B-29 gunner who supposedly shot-down a foo-fighter? I see what appears to be the same vague reference on wiki and other places but nothing more than that. Are we sure this incident really occurred?
User IP Logged

drwu23
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 6592
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #280 on: Jun 1st, 2012, 1:15pm »

Regarding 'foos'....I was always under the impression they were relatively small balls of light and not craft shaped. And I don't think I have ever seen any actual footage.
User IP Logged

Erno86
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3061
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #281 on: Jun 1st, 2012, 3:27pm »

on Jun 1st, 2012, 1:15pm, drwu23 wrote:
Regarding 'foos'....I was always under the impression they were relatively small balls of light and not craft shaped. And I don't think I have ever seen any actual footage.


Some reports of "foo balls" are smallish in diameter, other reports label them as quite huge ---"big as the harvest moon" --- in the perspective of looking at our moon from Earth. The Foofighter I witnessed was about 1 mile away --- approx. 700 to 1,000 feet in diameter. It was the most beautiful object that I have ever seen in my entire life.

I am willing to assume.... that the starship is encased inside the fiery fusion plasma of the Foofighter. Their has to be two magnetic shield's for the Foofighter to function properly. One reason... is to protect the saucer from the fusion plasma, the other, is the outer magnetic shield too contain the fusion plasma.
« Last Edit: Jun 1st, 2012, 3:29pm by Erno86 » User IP Logged

"It would be unsatisfactory, in my opinion, if a world without matter were possible."

Albert Einstein
Erno86
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3061
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #282 on: Jun 1st, 2012, 3:49pm »

I speculate...that the fusion plasma is needed --- besides for offensive and defensive operations --- for fuel for the photon engine, when little or no starlight photons are present for the photon receptor to feed the photons to the heart of the photon engine; that expells them with tremendous thrust.

Seawater is injected outside the inner magnetic shield. The outer magnetic shield presses upon the seawater against the inner magnetic shield with extreme pressure till the duterium atoms in the seawater have there protons fuse together, thus releasing photons; as in the fusion process.
User IP Logged

"It would be unsatisfactory, in my opinion, if a world without matter were possible."

Albert Einstein
GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 591
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #283 on: Jun 6th, 2012, 02:35am »

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/technology/sci-tech/x37b-is-this-operation-bewilder-the-chinese-20120606-1zvk5.html

I thought this was interesting as it looks like to be the first stage of dormant space drones, to be used when called upon.

You could have a fleet of Space drones with what ever weaponry you can imagine in orbit indefinitely depending on how space effects the technology.

The space race is back on.

G
User IP Logged

drwu23
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 6592
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #284 on: Jun 6th, 2012, 11:52am »

on Jun 1st, 2012, 3:27pm, Erno86 wrote:
Some reports of "foo balls" are smallish in diameter, other reports label them as quite huge ---"big as the harvest moon" --- in the perspective of looking at our moon from Earth. The Foofighter I witnessed was about 1 mile away --- approx. 700 to 1,000 feet in diameter. It was the most beautiful object that I have ever seen in my entire life.

I am willing to assume.... that the starship is encased inside the fiery fusion plasma of the Foofighter. Their has to be two magnetic shield's for the Foofighter to function properly. One reason... is to protect the saucer from the fusion plasma, the other, is the outer magnetic shield too contain the fusion plasma.


How do you know that what you 'saw' was a 'foo fighter,' and where are you getting all this other info from about fusion plasma and magnetic shields?
Are you personal friends with the aliens? No offense but comments like these are what give skeptics and others the reason to think that many in the ufo arena are not playing with a full deck.
wink
User IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21  ...  29 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls