Board Logo
« Political ET »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 25th, 2017, 05:39am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8  ...  28 Notify Send Topic Print
 veryhotthread  Author  Topic: Political ET  (Read 43688 times)
cerebcat
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 196
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #75 on: Oct 27th, 2010, 10:16am »

They're "patsys" and too full of themselves to realize it.

They have done more damage to UFology than they know. Because they don't adhere to scientific standards, they are left with some pretty weak theories that are laughable to most of the public.

News came out today that more nukes went off-line. And I don't mean leaks from military soruces. Doesn't anyone find this odd? Decades ago, this information would have been considered too sensitve to give to the news media. Why is it O.K. now.?

Cere
User IP Logged

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
CA519705950
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 587
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #76 on: Oct 27th, 2010, 11:32am »

on Oct 27th, 2010, 10:16am, cerebcat wrote:
They're "patsys" and too full of themselves to realize it.

They have done more damage to UFology than they know. Because they don't adhere to scientific standards, they are left with some pretty weak theories that are laughable to most of the public.

News came out today that more nukes went off-line. And I don't mean leaks from military soruces. Doesn't anyone find this odd? Decades ago, this information would have been considered too sensitve to give to the news media. Why is it O.K. now.?

Cere

Nukes went offline? What does that mean lol? Forgive my ignorance...
User IP Logged

"Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist."
Epicurus.
DrDil
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Fighting against truth decay!!


Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4224
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #77 on: Oct 27th, 2010, 2:29pm »

on Oct 27th, 2010, 11:32am, CA519705950 wrote:
Nukes went offline? What does that mean lol? Forgive my ignorance...

Hi Ca,

It's good to see you posting again!!

Quote:
On Saturday morning, according to people briefed on what happened, a squadron of ICBMs suddenly dropped down into what's known as "LF Down" status, meaning that the missileers in their bunkers could no longer communicate with the missiles themselves. LF Down status also means that various security protocols built into the missile delivery system, like intrusion alarms and warhead separation alarms, were offline. In LF Down status, the missiles are still technically launch-able, but they can only be controlled by an airborne command and control platform like the Boeing E-6 NAOC "Kneecap" aircraft, E-4B NAOC aircraft or perhaps the TACAMO fleet, which is primarily used to communicate with nuclear submarines. Had the country been placed on a higher state of nuclear alert, those platforms would be operating automatically because the frequencies used to transmit nuclear codes would be interfacing with separate systems, according to officials.
According to the official, engineers believe that a launch control center computer (LCC), responsible for a package of at least five missiles, usually ten of them, began to "ping" out of sequence, resulting in a surge of "noise" through the system. The LCCs interrogate each missile in sequence, so if they begin to send signals out when they're not supposed to, receivers on the missiles themselves will notice this and send out error codes.

Since LCCs ping out of sequence on occasion, missileers tried quick fixes. But as more and more missiles began to display error settings, they decided to take off-line all five LCCs that the malfunctioning center was connected to. That left 50 missiles in the dark. The missileers then restarted one of the LCCs, which began to normally interrogate the missile transceiver. Three other LCCs were successfully restarted. The suspect LCC remains off-line.

Source: TheAtlantic.com.

Hope that helps,


Cheers.
User IP Logged

Can't keep my eyes from the circling skies,
Tongue-tied & twisted, just an earth-bound misfit.
CA519705950
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 587
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #78 on: Oct 28th, 2010, 05:31am »

on Oct 27th, 2010, 2:29pm, DrDil wrote:
Hi Ca,

It's good to see you posting again!!

<snip>

Hope that helps,


Cheers.

Hey DrDil, good to be posting again smiley.
Yeah that helped a lot, thank-you. Very strange and very scary. I'm sure someone out there would have had the ability to take advantage of the situation had they known.
User IP Logged

"Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist."
Epicurus.
GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 585
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #79 on: Nov 1st, 2010, 10:34pm »

http://www.torontosun.com/news/columnists/thane_burnett/2010/10/28/15866311.html

The above link is interesting as it leads me to think if it no longer matters if governments disclose or not.

That ET would see the UN and the General Assembly of Nation States as being primitive like the City States of ancient Greece as being primitive.

Either way it does not change the current circumstances as humanities nature would be to live in various community structures.

ETs interaction to our hierarchical Nation States will be fascinating to see play out.

Their is no solid historical evidence of any ET interaction with heads of state except the Russian Governor.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser/2010/05/russian-governor-tells-tale-of-alien-abduction-president-asked-to-investigate/comments/page/2/

We shall see.

G undecided
« Last Edit: Nov 1st, 2010, 10:52pm by GusB » User IP Logged

cerebcat
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 196
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #80 on: Nov 1st, 2010, 11:00pm »

Quote:
The above link is interesting as it leads me to think if it no longer matters if governments disclose or not.


I tend to agree. However it's possible that military leaks are in fact being sanctioned.

Cere
User IP Logged

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 585
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #81 on: Nov 2nd, 2010, 12:53am »

on Nov 1st, 2010, 11:00pm, cerebcat wrote:
I tend to agree. However it's possible that military leaks are in fact being sanctioned.

Cere


I hope that all future UFO and ET related military leaks will be done through Wiki Leaks http://wikileaks.org/

G smiley
User IP Logged

cerebcat
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 196
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #82 on: Nov 2nd, 2010, 6:45pm »

Yes, this is what I would like to see. But then some evidence would need to be provided and documents would need to be verified by a forensic expert.

Sounds simple..except hard evidence seems difficult to come by.

Cere

User IP Logged

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 585
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #83 on: Nov 5th, 2010, 4:49pm »

Going back to the Nukes that were taken off line.

One implication of this information is that since that happened we now know that ET has the technology to completely hack into the highest levels of government.

Think about that for a minute, ET can go into any of our systems without us ever knowing it.

ET is so advanced that we must still look like advanced monkeys throwing stones. Instead of stone's we have progressed to bullets and rockets. I think the Battle of LA being a good example of this thinking.

The most unfortunate aspect of this is that these examples of direct ET contact communicating to humanity have been so few and far between.

G

User IP Logged

cerebcat
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 196
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #84 on: Nov 5th, 2010, 11:16pm »

GusB

We have to be careful here. The source of information is being leaked by military personnel and (most recently) the government via the media. We have their "say so" but do we have hard evidence?

It would not be a surprise to me however, for and advanced race to have this ability. You use the analogy of "monkeys"; I think "ants" is more apt.

Cere

User IP Logged

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 585
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #85 on: Nov 6th, 2010, 03:33am »

on Nov 5th, 2010, 11:16pm, cerebcat wrote:
GusB

We have to be careful here. The source of information is being leaked by military personnel and (most recently) the government via the media. We have their "say so" but do we have hard evidence?

It would not be a surprise to me however, for and advanced race to have this ability. You use the analogy of "monkeys"; I think "ants" is more apt.

Cere



LOL I was thinking ants as well.

G grin
User IP Logged

cerebcat
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 196
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #86 on: Nov 7th, 2010, 08:05am »

Link to RU's investigation of the missile shutdown, as claimed by Salas and Hastings.

http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/

Cere
User IP Logged

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
carolnistri
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 2042
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #87 on: Nov 8th, 2010, 12:34pm »

I just had on the Science Channel,it was all about UFOs seen in 2008.Kokomo Indiana was just one.You know what we havent zeroed in on and we really really should.Those F-16s that gave chase. Just think on that a minute.Those planes dont take off themselves they have pilots in them,those pilots just dont climb aboard and take off,there ordered up and told in which direction to fly,and what to look for and how to proceed,Im telling you this is an area an obvious area thats been hiding in plain sight. Those F-16s not only are told what direction to head out in they know whats expected of them when they get a lock on.They dont fire do they,they chase the ufos away.Now,would you do that if it were not a nuts and bolts craft,no you wouldnt. Someone ought to latch on to this thought its the missing link or could be the missing link in ufology.
User IP Logged

GusB
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 585
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #88 on: Nov 9th, 2010, 05:13am »

on Nov 7th, 2010, 08:05am, cerebcat wrote:
Link to RU's investigation of the missile shutdown, as claimed by Salas and Hastings.

http://www.realityuncovered.net/blog/

Cere


Oh man what a pain rolleyes so Cere I just skimmed it are they saying the UFO at the Nuke site is bull?

@ carolnistri

Their has been talk of the Real Blue Book that the military would have had a small reference of different types of UFOs. If you think about it their really isn't that many different types and unless they know what ETs pilot what UFOs that information is useless.

I did mention in a previous post that their will be a percentage of all military air craft that get tailed by UFOs.

The problem is that the US and UK Government has not released any information on policy to give chase and cut of UFOs that enter there air space. It was mentioned that these types of policy are a hang up from the cold war but the Stephenville UFOs would prove that wrong. Other countries in Iran have openly talked about chasing UFOs.

Keep in mind if these UFOs do show up on military radar the knee jerk reaction will be to give chase. So who needs policy when you just need to cover up.

G smiley
User IP Logged

cerebcat
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 196
xx Re: Political ET
« Reply #89 on: Nov 9th, 2010, 8:42pm »

Quote:
Oh man what a pain rolleyes so Cere I just skimmed it are they saying the UFO at the Nuke site is bull?


It would seem so. I watched the video again of Salas's appearance on Larry King. He stated that these missiles are very reliable (I would guess he means that they don't shut down for no reason). And yet, just recently missiles went off line (sorry I don't know the correct terminology) and it was blamed on a hardware glitch. Now I guess it's possible that not all the missiles are run off the same system. It's also possible that the military publicized this latest event to neutralize the Salas and Hasting claims.

Quote:
Their has been talk of the Real Blue Book that the military would have had a small reference of different types of UFOs. If you think about it their really isn't that many different types and unless they know what ETs pilot what UFOs that information is useless.


Or if these UFOs are in fact being piloted by entities. If these vehicles show advanted technology, they could very well be piloted by machines and computer programs. Or by something that is, at this time, beyond our capacity to understand.

Cere
« Last Edit: Nov 9th, 2010, 8:44pm by cerebcat » User IP Logged

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8  ...  28 Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls