Board Logo
« 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 23rd, 2018, 2:42pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1 2 3  Notify Send Topic Print
 veryhotthread  Author  Topic: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident  (Read 1633 times)
nofooln
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Yes, the Earth is Flat


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 141
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #15 on: Dec 19th, 2017, 8:57pm »

on Dec 19th, 2017, 4:36pm, INT21 wrote:
Just adding a couple of ingredients to this soup.

Tonight CNN mentioned (in suitably jocular media fashion) this business about government and ufos.
The example they used was something spotted in a gun camera over the sea off the California coast.

Now, a couple of days back I was watching a 'uest' item. 'UFOs: the lost evidence 'Deep sea encounters'. I don't particularly follow this aspect of the phenomena, but I watched it anyway. In fact I watched it four times.

What happened is that about 50 minutes into the video the subject was an area under the surface that is about 85 miles West of San Diego. It is a USGS image and shows an 'oval' object with pointy bits along the edges. The narrator was saying how it didn't look natural etc.

So on the third pass through I paused the screen when the image was at it's largest. And I had one of those 'You're not joking' moments.

But it wasn't the object of discussion that surprised me.

If you look off to the left and up a bit there are what look like terraces. four (maybe five) very defined and very straight lines run upwards at varying angles. From the lower edge of each distinct line there is a straight line leading off to the left. All these 'horizontal lines are parallel to each other. And they look very similar to a series of terrace walls.

It is striking that the area covered by the object and the 'terraces' is smooth. and yet the ocean floor in other parts of the shot is as you would expect it to be. Very twisted and organic.

Now, Nature may abhor a vacuum. but it also doesn't do straight lines.

Well worth the time to look it up if you haven't seen it already.

Thing is, if I hadn't paused the video to look closer at the 'object' I wouldn't have noticed the straight lines.

HAL
INT21

HAL,
Can you provide a link to the video you described? Sounds interesting.

Thanks,
NF/Flat
User IP Logged

Skeptical
Junior Member
ImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

"No more Mr. Nice Guy..."


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 38
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #16 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 11:45am »

I will admit, the Navy video is the biggest development in the UFO story in probably a decade. But, like the O'Hare and Stephenville cases, what will happen after the initial media heat dissipates?

This one is a bit different qualitatively in that there is video and the pilots involved have come forward on the record. Still, we've had good reports before that ultimately lead us no closer to a solution. So, while I am excited we have something new to talk about, my excitement is tempered by the probability that it will change nothing.

S
User IP Logged

thelmadonna
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 275
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #17 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 12:09pm »

I agree, my hopes haven't been raised even a little bit. Perhaps it will need bigger fish to announce the full report, or Pres Trump on his twitter account.
User IP Logged

non sinas bastardi tere te deorsum
INT21
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3202
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #18 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 1:40pm »

Nofooln,

Sorry, I don't have a link as I watched it on tv.

I can tell you it was aired recently (UK) on the 'quest' channel. 'UFOs: the lost evidence' series. The episode title being 'Deep sea encounters'.

Maybe someone out there can come up with a link, or perhaps you can catch up with it on the quest channel .

HAL
INT21
User IP Logged

Isn't it midnight, on the other side of the world.
Do you remember
the face of a pretty girl ?
travex
Guest
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #19 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 2:10pm »

on Dec 20th, 2017, 11:45am, Skeptical wrote:
This one is a bit different qualitatively in that there is video and the pilots involved have come forward on the record. Still, we've had good reports before that ultimately lead us no closer to a solution. So, while I am excited we have something new to talk about, my excitement is tempered by the probability that it will change nothing.



Virgin Mary began shed her tears and the flock of faithfuls rejoiced once again. Wasn't it true that back in 1986, the pilots of a Japanese cargo plane witnessed an extraordinary event ascribed to the UFO? Today, after 31 years, UFO still remains a pure belief in the existence of non-human advanced intelligence, which agrees with the broad definition of God. So what "qualitative difference" are you talking about, forcrysake? You should seek help...


Ah, DeLonge 31 years. . . .

I know what you mean, but your pronunciation is not at its best. It's THE LONG 31 years.

Sorry. Anyway, do you have any suggestion when to release the info on that "Tic Tac" UFO to the public?

Are you serious? You showed that image to the pilots off the coast of California, so you know very well when to release the story to the respected media. And please don't pretend that you don't know.
California is the 31st State of the Union, and that means after "DeLonge" 31 years from the 1986 pilot sighting. That's how Where_When also works, doesn't it?
And I say unto you once again, that you've been wasting your time every moment you make an attempt to initiate an intelligent contact with those earth-based.

But they are making some progress. Look:
https://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~carlp/PDF/extraterrestrial.pdf

Oh, you think that if 31 is the 11th primer number, and the 11th month is November, something would click in their heads, right? You're funny...
If you think that they notice the prime opposites 31 and 13
31 + 1986 = 2017
13 + 2004 = 2017
that tie two major pilot sighting in 1886 and 2004, then you are double funny.
Listen, you are out there, but I live with them - I know what they are like them Homo sapiens.


And so, finally, effective December 21, 2012, common sense prevailed over the hope out there and all manifestations of UFO were canceled. Good. It's been only attracting the attention of semi-derranged debunkers.
« Last Edit: Dec 20th, 2017, 2:10pm by travex » User IP Logged

nofooln
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Yes, the Earth is Flat


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 141
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #20 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 4:08pm »

on Dec 20th, 2017, 1:40pm, INT21 wrote:
Nofooln,

Sorry, I don't have a link as I watched it on tv.

I can tell you it was aired recently (UK) on the 'quest' channel. 'UFOs: the lost evidence' series. The episode title being 'Deep sea encounters'.

Maybe someone out there can come up with a link, or perhaps you can catch up with it on the quest channel .

HAL
INT21

Not sure if we get the Quest channel here in the US, but thanks for the info anyway. A few years back I watched a program on TV about multiple sightings of USOs in that area, so all of this is in support of the idea that there may be an underwater base there.

This is quite an exciting development, but as always there appear to be facts that taint the waters. In this case it's the claim that this video has been around, and its origin was perhaps a German school for video creation. If you've heard the sound track of the video, it doesn't actually sound like it's of a military pilot communicating via radio. It's ultra clear with no background noise that I noticed, and the language was casual, American slang. Not what one would expect.

NF/Flat
User IP Logged

INT21
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3202
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #21 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 4:16pm »

I believe that 'quest' is also 'The discovery Channel'.

Hope that helps. Maybe a trawl trough YouTube for things like

'California USO bases' may be a way in.

HAL
INT21
User IP Logged

Isn't it midnight, on the other side of the world.
Do you remember
the face of a pretty girl ?
thelmadonna
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 275
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #22 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 5:43pm »



Please dont keep up with the numerology stuff, just be travex and use your number talent to do some answering of straight questions. Like the deciphering of near same DNA Code you presented. Tell us why it is different and what the differences mean. If you answer any way other than straight-forward I give up with you. sad

http://proofofalien.com/decode-the-chilbolton-crop-circles-alien-messages/
« Last Edit: Dec 20th, 2017, 5:44pm by thelmadonna » User IP Logged

non sinas bastardi tere te deorsum
INT21
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 3202
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #23 on: Dec 20th, 2017, 6:01pm »

NoFooln,

Try this. It shows a message saying it is not for viewing in the UK, but you may be able to get it. It does appear to be part of the Discovery channel .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mBXwVesJ4A

HAL
INT21
User IP Logged

Isn't it midnight, on the other side of the world.
Do you remember
the face of a pretty girl ?
nofooln
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Yes, the Earth is Flat


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 141
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #24 on: Dec 21st, 2017, 2:14pm »

on Dec 20th, 2017, 6:01pm, INT21 wrote:
NoFooln,

Try this. It shows a message saying it is not for viewing in the UK, but you may be able to get it. It does appear to be part of the Discovery channel .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mBXwVesJ4A

HAL
INT21

HAL, Thanks again for your help. Unfortunately the link is to a pay-per-view channel on YouTube, and being the cheapskate that I am, I will pass! I did do a quick search of underwater UFOs as you suggested and there are many videos to look at. Maybe I'll see what you were talking about when I take the time to look at them. I appreciate your help!

NF/Flat
User IP Logged

travex
Guest
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #25 on: Jan 2nd, 2018, 6:55pm »

on Dec 20th, 2017, 2:10pm, travex wrote:
And so, finally, effective December 21, 2012, common sense prevailed over the hope out there and all manifestations of UFO were canceled. Good. It's been only attracting the attention of semi-derranged debunkers.


The notion that the UFO research is in the state of complete desolation is supported by the video embedded in the original NYT article.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html

The pilot described the shape of the mysterious object as closely resembling Tic Tac, but the image captured doesn't support that description. Does it even matter to anyone, anymore?

User Image

The shape rather resembles the one that Kenneth Arnold provided back in 1947.

User Image

Is there any way the ET's would support the similarity between both shapes?

Definitely so.

Just select these two parameters from the Kenneth Arnold sighting: Where and What.

Where: Washington (state)
What: 9 objects


The minimal reduction of the data leaves you with single leading characters.

Where: W
What: 9


Here is the trick. If you also reduce Where and When to single characters, you end up with two W's and the parameters would be reduced to their bare minimum:

W: W
W: 9


There is a relationship between the characters above and it asks a question.

W = W
W = 9?


In other words, if W=W, does also W=9?

Hardly so, because W is the 23rd letter in the alphabet - not the 9th.

That's true, but there is a circumstance where W=9 is correct:

User Image

See that W? It shares the same(=) position(left) with 9 on another "circle."

User Image

The pilots pretty much understand that W=9, because Boggie 9 o'clock has the same meaning as Boggie to the west.

Using the Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting, the ET's reinforced direction West.

Why?

Because they were going to hack the mind of a person who wrote the pilots' conversation into the video and force an error involving the W(west) direction. See, confusing the mind of an enemy through neural hacking is a weapon that Pentagon would love to have in its arsenal. So, here is the corrected "westerly"error.

User Image

The text originally mentioned MILES not KNOTS. Here is the error acknowledgement:

User Image

Now, you can backstep from

W=W
W=9


all the way to

Where: Washington (state)
What: 9 objects


which are the Where/When parameters of the Kenneth Arnold sighting of 1947.

But what about the speed of the wind - those 120 knots? The clue Wind = West calls for more, after all.

Well, sapiens, can you build something out of those three kinds of digits 1, 2, and 0?

Sure. Anytime. cool

1 2 0 --> 12212012

Our build - 12212012 - means the notorious "Mayan" end date: 12/21/2012. That's the date ET's decided to stop all UFO activities, because any continuation would be really a waste of time. The ET's hacked the mind of the military brass as well and made it end its UFO investigation also in 2012 in sync.

Pentagon admits it had a UFO program, claims it ended in 2012
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/pentagon-admits-it-had-ufo-program-claims-it-ended-2012-n830491

The ET's quit because we have never shown them anything apart from whining that the government is hiding the truth about UFO. What truth? The government knows crap about who the ET's actually are and what incredible tech capabilities they posses.

User IP Logged

GhostofEd
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Intelligence is not a moral category


PM


Posts: 1488
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #26 on: Jan 2nd, 2018, 7:23pm »

on Jan 2nd, 2018, 6:55pm, travex wrote:
The ET's quit because we have never shown them anything apart from whining that the government is hiding the truth about UFO. What truth? The government knows crap about who the ET's actually are and what incredible tech capabilities they posses.

Well I gotta ask. Why should we or anyone else believe you know crap about ET?
User IP Logged

Trump looking at eclipse w/out eyewear was “perhaps the most impressive thing any president has ever done.”
ZETAR
Mod Director
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

GREAT SPIRITS ALWAYS ENCOUNTER THE MOST VIOLENT OPPOSITION FROM MEDIOCRE MINDS E=MC2


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 8649
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #27 on: Jan 2nd, 2018, 8:28pm »

TRAV,

"Is there any way the ET's would support the similarity between both shapes?"

WHICH FURTHER BEGS THE QUESTION AS TO WHETHER U.A.P.(UNKNOWN/UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA) TECHNOLOGY IS SPECIES SPECIFIC...DISCOUNTING TERRESTRIAL TECHNOVATIONS wink

SHALOM...Z
« Last Edit: Jan 2nd, 2018, 8:30pm by ZETAR » User IP Logged

GREAT SPIRITS ALWAYS ENCOUNTER THE MOST VIOLENT OPPOSITION FROM MEDIOCRE MINDS E=MC2
nofooln
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Yes, the Earth is Flat


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 141
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #28 on: Jan 4th, 2018, 12:02am »

Fox News interview with the pilot.



NF/Flat
User IP Logged

Swamprat
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4460
xx Re: 2004 USS Nimitz UFO Incident
« Reply #29 on: Jan 4th, 2018, 4:08pm »

Nimitz UFO-Video: Alleged Trace to German Film Production Company Leads to a Mysterious Dead End:

http://www.openminds.tv/nimitz-ufo-video-alleged-trace-to-german-film-production-company-leads-to-a-mysterious-dead-end/41459

User IP Logged

"Let's see what's over there."
Pages: 1 2 3  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls