Board Logo
« Greenpeace and chemtrails »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 24th, 2017, 02:08am


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 thread  Author  Topic: Greenpeace and chemtrails  (Read 743 times)
supersidufo
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 282
xx Greenpeace and chemtrails
« Thread started on: Apr 15th, 2015, 07:17am »

I have received this item about Greenpeace and their virdict on chemtrails ! Seemingly there is no hazard huh?

http://disinformationdirectory.com/d/forum/environmental-groups/244-greenpeace-uk-calls-chemtrails-an-urban-myth-conspiracy-theory
User IP Logged

Nobody loves me you know !

We are not humans on a spiritual journey but spiritual people on a human journey.
GhostofEd
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

You know, I'm like a smart person


PM


Posts: 1378
xx Re: Greenpeace and chemtrails
« Reply #1 on: Apr 15th, 2015, 11:47am »

Were the hazards associated with the extremes of the chemtrail beliefs ever been proven in the first place? I'm not surprised of the findings and more surprised they bothered looking into it.

Their opinion won't change any beliefs and will add to the conspiracy as being an example of the PTB's covering it up.

I would like to know why no group has conducted a controlled study to fly through the many trails, collect samples, perform tests following all the proper protocols, repeat verify and submit results for peer reviews? Unfortunately I know the answer - it's been tried but covered up.
« Last Edit: Apr 15th, 2015, 12:44pm by GhostofEd » User IP Logged

"The concept of shaking hands is absolutely terrible, and statistically Iíve been proven right."

~ D. Trump 2004
Smersh
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar



ICQ
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 1854
xx Re: Greenpeace and chemtrails
« Reply #2 on: Apr 30th, 2015, 5:11pm »

on Apr 15th, 2015, 11:47am, GhostofEd wrote:
... I would like to know why no group has conducted a controlled study to fly through the many trails, collect samples, perform tests following all the proper protocols, repeat verify and submit results for peer reviews? ...


You mean the groups that promote the chemtrail hoax, such as Russ Tanner's group on Facebook or Dane Wigington and his followers? Probably because they know perfectly well that the results will be negative and badly affect their snake oil sales ...

on Apr 15th, 2015, 11:47am, GhostofEd wrote:
Unfortunately I know the answer - it's been tried but covered up.


As far as I know, no chemtrail proponents' group has ever conducted this experiment, in spite of constantly being urged to do so in forums such as ATS and on social media ...

User IP Logged

http://www.cosmophobia.org/

Pobody's nerfect.
MOKSHA
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

SOUL=402 KOPAVI=444 METATRON=636


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4365
xx Re: Greenpeace and chemtrails
« Reply #3 on: Apr 30th, 2015, 5:36pm »

Hello<>SMERSH,
I would be interested in that kind of
experiment
I stopped ranting about this, due to the
bias
and what kind of propaganda spawned from it,
I stopped taking pictures, people here in
Florida, do see the change in our
"NORMAL SKY"
from what "Langley" promotes as long lived con<>trails
cannot not exist in the conditions in LA. . .
by their own protocols. . .

so something is a miss.
tongue
User IP Logged

We are not to worry about a grain of sand in our friends eye, when we may have a two by four sticking out of our own
Smersh
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar



ICQ
Homepage PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 1854
xx Re: Greenpeace and chemtrails
« Reply #4 on: May 1st, 2015, 09:03am »

Hi MOKSHA.

on Apr 30th, 2015, 5:36pm, MOKSHA wrote:
I would be interested in that kind of
experiment ...


Yes and it could be done very cheaply if enough people were to chip in towards the cost of hiring a plane, pilot and the necessary equipment. For example, the membership of Russ Tanner's Chemtrail Global Skywatch Facebook group numbers about 30,000, so it would only cost them a dollar or two each.

on Apr 30th, 2015, 5:36pm, MOKSHA wrote:
... I stopped taking pictures, people here in
Florida, do see the change in our
"NORMAL SKY" ...


There are thousands of photos online of contrails, which are claimed to be "chemtrails" so yes, there's really no point in taking any more because what would it prove?

As for "normal sky" what do you mean by that? What exactly IS a "normal sky?

on Apr 30th, 2015, 5:36pm, MOKSHA wrote:
... from what "Langley" promotes as long lived con<>trails
cannot not exist in the conditions in LA. . .
by their own protocols. . .


Langley? Do you mean the CIA? What do they have to do with it? Ask any meteorologist or anyone who has studied atmospheric science and they will tell you that the trails are simply ice crystals, and their appearance and how long they last depends on the amount of humidity present at the altitude and location where they are at.

As for the conditions at LA, how do they differ from anywhere else in the world at high alitude?

on Apr 30th, 2015, 5:36pm, MOKSHA wrote:
...so something is a miss.
tongue


The only thing that's amiss is that some people continue to be fooled by this hoax, instead of taking some time to study some atmospheric science and use a little common sense.

Here's how the hoax first got started: A Brief History of "Chemtrails"

User IP Logged

http://www.cosmophobia.org/

Pobody's nerfect.
MOKSHA
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

SOUL=402 KOPAVI=444 METATRON=636


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4365
xx Re: Greenpeace and chemtrails
« Reply #5 on: May 5th, 2015, 07:06am »

All I'm going to say
SMERSH,
what I see, is not what is being defined,
that's it, I have nothing else, but here,
I have looked at the data, now you can too.
PDF
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/1/e/1955_Murgatroyd_Goldsmith_Hollings.pdf

If you think it's a hoax, cool I believe you think it is.
OK
MW
User IP Logged

We are not to worry about a grain of sand in our friends eye, when we may have a two by four sticking out of our own
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 18,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls