Board Logo
« ?FOIA - Part 3 »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Sep 21st, 2017, 6:07pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 thread  Author  Topic: ?FOIA - Part 3  (Read 176 times)
travex
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 101
xx ?FOIA - Part 3
« Thread started on: Aug 17th, 2017, 3:41pm »

FOIA is the abbreviation of Freedom of Information Act. The UFO writers liked to peek into the government files released to the public through FOIA to support the idea that space visitors have been snooping around our planet. Those were the government files and the appeal to the authority as an argument really counts.
https://www.archives.gov/foia/ufos.html

The government doesn't seem to be overly excited about the idea of a possible alien presence, because the ET's can reveal to the public any government secrets - there is really no way of hiding anything before them. To reveal one deep secret, the aliens used a special key that opened another "FOIA file" to select a rather important UFO sighting, which the Project Blue Book doesn't mention. The key looks like this:

User Image

You place the U-key in front of FOIA, and the magnetic attraction will do the rest in two easy steps.

1) U <--- FOIA
2) UFO IA


By attracting FO, the U-key breaks apart FOIA and that opens the acronym right in the middle.

Closed: FOIA
Open: FO IA


That's a neat trick, but there is nothing in there - there is just an empty space between O and I!

We can't see anything, because we, as very often, fail to see the "overall picture" and that is

UFO IA: UFO=Unidentified Flying Object, IA=Iowa

And off to Iowa we go to see that special UFO...
http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/ndxlia.html

Oh, dear! Which sighting do the aliens mean?

If you take into account the expression UFO IA, its obvious that the particular UFO sighting got something to do with IA. The expression UFO IA actually defines the particular UFO as IA. So if you happen to see a UFO in Iowa as it splits into two parts

IA ---> I A

you know that the aliens figured out how the postal symbol IA for Iowa came about:

IA ----> I?A ----> IowaA

It also means that the particular UFO sighting we are looking for is defined as I A with a space between I and A.

That's all very nice, but the defining term I A doesn't appear in the NUFORC long list of UFO sightings in Iowa - there is not one incidence of it on the entire page!

Well, sapiens, what are you going to do now?

That's a silly question. We quit the search. Duh.

But before we quit, we can at least separate the special from the ordinary in some other way, not to look completely stupid in the eyes of the whole universe. If you look at the NUFORC webpage, you see that the majority of the text is black, but there is a special exemption: the leftmost data column is printed blue. Moreover, if you click on it, there will be a page redirection. This special blue column is made of numbers - these are the dates in which the various sighting took place.

Too bad that the definition is made of two spaced letters I and A instead of two spaced numbers. We could have used the special blue column to search for the special sighting by date; we could have named our search for the special UFO "Project Blue Column" instead of "Project Blue Book." Oh, well...

Please note that there is a profound difference between the ETs and us: they never quit; they don't have that word in the dictionary...

So, you smart ET asses, how does it go, then?

You get the idea from Part 1 and Part 2, the latter not being a separate thread...

If letters are not of any use, but numbers could be, you can convert the letters into numbers using the most natural way and that's the alphabetical order. So, if I=9 and A=1, then a conversion is due.

I A ----alphabetical order----> 9 1

Since Iowa is in the USA where the MDY date format is used, it follows that

(9 1) = (September 1)

Now you check the blue column to see if there is only one instance where a UFO was observed on September 1.

As you see in Part 1, that's not the case: there have been more than one sighting like that in Iowa. Is it possible to select from the special September 1 list the unique UFO sighting?

Unfortunately, there would be no near consensus upon the attempt to tell the things apart...

In this situation, quitting the search is not an embarrassing option. Just take the case to the Nobel Prize winners and they fold up too. But before we go, we should consider an easier case and attempt to select a significant September 1 in human history, so there would be no or a little disagreement. How about

September 1, 1939?

On that date, the most terrifying war in modern human history broke out, claiming some eighty million human lives. So it's hard to argue that the year 1939 wasn't sadly special as well. And now... Click! And we are done:

Mother sees UFO above railroad tracks in 1939.
http://www.nuforc.org/webreports/045/S45006.html

There is only one sighting listed for the year 1939 in Iowa, and only one means unique. From the above, you can see that Iowa, 1939 is the same as September 1, 1939, courtesy the postal code IA.

(Iowa, 1939) ---->( IowA, 1939) ---->(I A) ----> (9 1) ----> (September 1, 1939)

Wait a minute! The date of the listed sighting is 7/7/1939. It should have taken place on 9/1/1939, no?

The surprising answer is "NO!"

See, that woman could make the story up, or there could be possibly some other explanation to what she saw. Her son could have made the story up as well. The aliens are
pretty much aware of these options and need to adjust the circumstances of the sighting the way there would be a coordination between the principal data of the sighting. See, if a person reports a UFO by making the event up, all the data he or she come up with would lack any coordination - the data would be in essence randomly chosen. In the case of a true UFO sighting, the data will be coordinated. Here is the part of the description to focus on:

She said she could tell there was something large there although she really couldn't see anything, just a huge black oval "space" where there were no stars or anything else visible. She could tell it had a shape and it hovered over the tracks for about 10 minutes and made absolutely no sound. She never saw anything like it again but clearly never forgot about it.

Note that there is a special word in the excerpt. It is the only one enclosed in quotation marks, and the word is space. As a matter of fact, the preceding adjective is "oval," so you can render it as ( ) - the space between I and A:

I( )A

Are we on the right track? Let's read it once more:

She said she could tell there was something large there although she really couldn't see anything, just a huge black oval "space" where there were no stars or anything else visible. She could tell it had a shape and it hovered over the tracks for about 10 minutes and made absolutely no sound. She never saw anything like it again but clearly never forgot about it.

Very likely we are...

At this point, it would be very helpful to adjust the story, so the woman would go out and talk to the ETs.

What are you doing here?

What does it look like, ma'm? We're looking at the railroad tracks.

You never saw railroad tracks before?

We did; we just examine them looking for cracks. We try to be helpful as much as we can. The safety of mankind is a thing very close to our heart.


The fact that such a conversation never took place doesn't change the situation that the peculiar object, which the woman saw, was hovering above railroad tracks. If the object was a real UFO effect, then there had to be a reason for its position above the railroad tracks.

So let's try something else for a change: let's attempt to find a reason to the activity of that alleged UFO that the woman claimed seeing back in 1939 in Iowa. See, UFO is about an intelligent extraterrestrial life, and intelligence is also about reason. It follows that where is no reason, there is no intelligence and consequently no credible UFO story no matter what the UFO bishops have tried to push through.

In the next post, we'll find out that the woman was very unlikely to make the story up. . . .
User IP Logged

travex
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 101
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #1 on: Aug 17th, 2017, 4:02pm »

Here is the way the ET's designed the UFO sighting described in the NUFORC report:

The railroad tracks are the way for a train to get from one populated place to another. Use your keypad to render the tracks. The symbol for railroad tracks, which are two parallel lines, is usually located in the upper-left part of your keypad:

User Image

Now we are ready to take the train from September to One:

9=1 (1939) huh

As you see, our intention was thwarted by the fact that 9 doesn't equal 1. Laying down railroad tracks, symbolized by the "equals to" character, between 9 and 1 would be a gross mistake. But we can make another trip - no math error this time:

7=7 (1939)

Of course, 7=7 is just another way of writing the date 7/7, or July 7, which is the date remembered by the witness as the one when she saw the very strange object hovering over the local railroad tracks. And that's the reason why the sighting by the railroad tracks couldn't take place on 9/1/1939 when Germany attacked Poland: 9 really doesn't equal 1. In other words, the railroad tracks = leading from 9 to 1 couldn't be laid down due to the inequality between 9 and 1, and so the ET's had to choose another month and day or move away from the railroad tracks. They chose the former and you'll see why.

Can we also render the railroad tracks with respect to WHERE, that means with respect to Iowa?

Yes, not only we can, but we need to. It is the first letter I in the name of the state that comes handy. 'I' is a straight line, so we can easily use it to render the railroad tracks:

II

You need to come into grip with the fact that the ET's are extremely imaginative guys, so don't be surprised by the following puzzle: The train follows the tracks until it reaches a train station where it stops. Is the station on the right side of the tracks or on the left side?

1) II here?
or
2) here? II


How the heck can anyone tell?

The ET's can. Find the name of the train station first and that tells you its location alongside the tracks.

Are you kidding me? What name? Iowa? But that's a name of an entire state!

The name of the station are word(s) that you create according to the time circumstances, and the time circumstances are the year 1939 when the sighting took place. If the name of the train station is World War, then the station must be on the left side of the tracks:

War World II

Or was there more significant event in 1939 than the beginning of the deadliest war in human history?

So remember: When the aliens see an expression like World War II, the II part can remind them of a road or railroad tracks. Then, they would use the similarity as a base for the construction of a UFO sighting, like that one in Iowa back in July 1939.

Does that all mean that the event described in the report was indeed a real UFO manifestation?

No. At this moment, you can only assume that it was likely real, because there are other logical options for the date (month and day) of the sighting.

But wait! What if the woman didn't look out the window? In that case the whole event would go unnoticed and we would never learn anything!

There are always ways and means to prevent that happening:

Once in the middle of the night she sat up in bed and felt compelled to look out her window.

Aha! She felt compelled... Wasn't Adolf Hitler compelled to attack Poland back in 1939 as well?

Clearly, it would be a mistake to entirely disregard the UFOlklore.
http://www.urbanghostsmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/nazi-ufo-flying-saucer.jpg

We can find out more about that in Part 4. Or wouldn't be better to preserve the image of the ET's as insane space nuts who keep showing up here and there for no apparent reason? After all, that option is much easier on "the CPU" in our heads.
« Last Edit: Aug 17th, 2017, 4:12pm by travex » User IP Logged

Swamprat
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4079
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #2 on: Aug 17th, 2017, 4:56pm »

I don't presume to tell anyone what does and does not belong on a forum such as UFO Casebook. We all march to different drummers. As for me, it is threads like this that are the bane of Casebook. Threads like this are insulting to those folks who have a genuine interest in the UFO phenomenon.


User Image
User IP Logged

"Let's see what's over there."
travex
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 101
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #3 on: Aug 17th, 2017, 11:40pm »

on Aug 17th, 2017, 4:56pm, Swamprat wrote:
I don't presume to tell anyone what does and does not belong on a forum such as UFO Casebook. We all march to different drummers. As for me, it is threads like this that are the bane of Casebook. Threads like this are insulting to those folks who have a genuine interest in the UFO phenomenon.


User Image

Swamprat, it seems that the UFO on the pic you've pasted issues some kind of radiation, but the shape of the ET craft is really strange - I can't really tell if it is a UFO or if it can be explained rationally.

I wanted to ask you... What does it mean that "genuine interest in UFO?" Can you give me a couple of other examples?
User IP Logged

thelmadonna
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 249
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #4 on: Aug 18th, 2017, 01:57am »

As for me, it is threads like this that are the bane of Casebook. Threads like this are insulting to those folks who have a genuine interest in the UFO phenomenon.

I agree, number-juggling, the answers are all inside your head travex, unlike the premise of UFO being out there, Out there is open to others,whereas we cant reach inside your head. I have known a few numericalists during my lifetime. They are draining, My worst ever time during the company of one such person, I took them to a bingo session, he caused an uproar every time a number was called. The day after a two hour session with me, he was sectioned for 3mnths. I daren't laugh. smiley
User IP Logged

non sinas bastardi tere te deorsum
purr
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

..you talkin' to me...YOU TALKIN' TO ME..??!


PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 4821
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #5 on: Aug 18th, 2017, 03:18am »

Travex, with the utmost effort I am able to follow the line of reasoning in your post, but I don't see how it describes objective reality. If nothing else you must be a very smart person to be able to create these posts.

Question comes to mind:

?ENIUS

or

?ROLL


smiley


purr
User IP Logged

Let us be sure that those who come after will say of us in our time, that in our time we did everything that could be done. We finished the race; we kept them free; we kept the faith.

-RONALD REAGAN
Swamprat
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4079
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #6 on: Aug 18th, 2017, 10:09am »

Why travex, those are EXHAUST fumes!


You see 3 rings, but there are 5 plumes because the heat...oh, NEVER MIND!

Sigh...... angry
User IP Logged

"Let's see what's over there."
travex
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 101
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #7 on: Aug 18th, 2017, 12:01pm »

on Aug 18th, 2017, 03:18am, purr wrote:
Travex, with the utmost effort I am able to follow the line of reasoning in your post, but I don't see how it describes objective reality.

Well, it happens to be quite demanding case for an unprepared mind, and I questioned a couple of times my intention to go ahead and post it. But The Casebook Forum has an excellent text editor, and so I sort of save it there for myself.

As you mentioned the term "objective reality," it is miles away from the UFO research, because the subject belongs to the box labeled "Hypothesis." There has never been an objective reality near the topic of UFO. On the contrary - many UFO attendees call themselves "believers." That description and "objective reality" move in fact in opposite direction. That's another reason why my scribble is so... well, alien looking.

In my post, I used the term "very likely" to stay abreast with a level of confidence called "hypothesis." You will hardly succeed breaking the shell of objective reality on the two pillars of UFO interest, meaning the Kenneth Arnold sighting and the Roswell case. Those are data based just on witness(es) accounts - no photos - as much as the Iowa sighting of 1939 is.

Similar situation exists in the world of cosmology and particle physics. If the Standard Model falls short of explaining some principal questions, a different approach to the puzzle is considered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

But such an effort solely based on "numerology" will meet with criticism, as it happened. Some even argue that the theory plainly failed, mainly because it cannot be verified experimentally.
http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2016/01/string_theory_has_failed_as_a_scientific_theory.html

I'm positive that a mere reverence to the alleged UFO manifestation will not open the door to the objective reality that you've mentioned, and which is necessary to show to the world that the UFO is indeed what is now believed to be. For that to happen, you would need an active participation from the hypothetical ET's, but you won't very, very likely get it. After all these long years, there has been no single instance of UFO manifestation that would move things closer to the objective reality spot. Why would that be different in the future?

Speaking of which...

It is not easy at all to do the math, but the odds are broadly in favor of the conclusion that the ETs knew beforehand that Adolf Hitler would attack Poland on September 1, 1939, which has became an objective reality that even Hitler didn't know back July 1939 - the date of the attack wasn't firmly set yet. That gives the alleged ET's presence a rational purpose of being around, e.g. secretly informing someone here about significant events that are scheduled to take place in the future.
User IP Logged

travex
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 101
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #8 on: Aug 18th, 2017, 12:22pm »

on Aug 17th, 2017, 4:56pm, Swamprat wrote:
We all march to different drummers.

User Image


Swamprat, MUFON informs me that your pic of what you sought was UFO has a rational explanation:

User Image
User IP Logged

Swamprat
Gold Member
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 4079
xx Re: ?FOIA - Part 3
« Reply #9 on: Aug 18th, 2017, 2:37pm »

As do 87.97645321896745231987654321246897531% of all sightings! Go ahead! LICK it! cool
User IP Logged

"Let's see what's over there."
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls