Board Logo
« Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 23rd, 2018, 2:43pm


Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

*Totally FREE 24/7 Access *Your Nickname and Avatar *Private Messages

*Join today and be a part of one of the largest UFO sites on the Net.


« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 thread  Author  Topic: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO  (Read 355 times)
travex
Guest
xx Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Thread started on: Dec 23rd, 2017, 7:45pm »

There was no single purpose in the display that took place back in November 14, 2004. The shape of the exhibit was decided upon with respect to the scheduled extraordinary follow up later: an article dealing with UFO published in The New York Times!!! That's probably more surprising event than a flying saucer landing on the White House lawn.

Yes, lots of Homo sapiens still remain curious creatures and that's why The New York Times folks felt obliged to do some explaining:

Our readers are plenty interested in unidentified flying objects. We know that from the huge response to our front-page Sunday article (published online just after noon on Saturday) revealing a secret Pentagon program to investigate U.F.O.s. The piece, by the Pentagon correspondent Helene Cooper, the author Leslie Kean and myself — a contributor to The Times after a 45-year staff career — has dominated the most.

Note that the curiosity didn't involve the debilitating issue of the described object being "real" or not, but it concerned the path leading to the unusual - the publishing of the article in a place you would expect the least. So we've scored some points out there...

Here is a paragraph in the explanatory NYT article, which directly deals with the decision what type of shape the UFO would be available for perusal to the Navy pilots.

She learned it was a secret effort, funded at the initiative of the then Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, starting in 2007, to investigate aerial threats including what the military preferred to call “unidentified aerial phenomena” or just “objects.” This was big news because the United States military had announced as far back as 1969 that U.F.O.s were not worth studying. Leslie also learned that Mr. Elizondo had just resigned to protest what he characterized as excessive secrecy and internal opposition — the reason for the meeting.

Does anyone see any link between the "Tic-Tac" shape, as one of the pilots correctly described it, and the paragraph above?

See, the UFO displays are designed by extraterrestrial humans, and they are extremely clever, so it may be difficult for us to uncover hidden links like that.

Here is the paragraph once again:

She learned it was a secret effort, funded at the initiative of the then Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, starting in 2007, to investigate aerial threats including what the military preferred to call “unidentified aerial phenomena” or just “objects.” This was big news because the United States military had announced as far back as 1969 that U.F.O.s were not worth studying. Leslie also learned that Mr. Elizondo had just resigned to protest what he characterized as excessive secrecy and internal opposition — the reason for the meeting.

Did that red highlight help?

No? Well, lets zoom in once more and the lock clicks right away:

She learned it was a secret effort, funded at the initiative of the then Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, starting in 2007, to investigate aerial threats including what the military preferred to call “unidentified aerial phenomena” or just “objects.” This was big news because the United States military had announced as far back as 1969 that U.F.O.s were not worth studying.Leslie also learned that Mr. Elizondo had just resigned to protest what he characterized as excessive secrecy and internal opposition — the reason for the meeting.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/18/insider/secret-pentagon-ufo-program.html

Tic Tacs were first introduced by Ferrero in 1969, under the name "Refreshing Mints".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tic_Tac

The identity 1969=1969 ties a Tic Tac UFO with the statement that UFO's were not worth of studying. There could be a benefit from studying the language UFO speaks - perhaps lots of people's lives could be saved. Here is the argument:

It was the military that observed the Tic Tac UFO, and we know that the president is the supreme commander of the armed forces. Back in 2004 when the Tic Tac UFO was approached by the F/A-18 Hornet fighter, the president was George W. Bush - the 43rd President of the United States. Since some earth-based humans didn't agree with the conclusion that studying behavior of UFO's is a waste of time, they know how to convert data. In this case, the ordinal number 43 means number of days into the future. Now set the day of the UFO encounter as day 1 and count all the way up to the 43th day. This is the result.

1st day: November 14, 2004
43th day: December 26, 2004


On that day, December 26, 2004, the telemetry of the ET humans also showed something similar to the Tic Tac UFO - except those objects were floating in the water still.

User Image

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_and_tsunami

Here is the way the link between Where and When (day/month) was made:

The undersea megathrust earthquake was caused when the Indian Plate was subducted by the Burma Plate and triggered a series of devastating tsunamis along the coasts of most landmasses bordering the Indian Ocean, killing 230,000–280,000 people in 14 countries, and inundating coastal communities with waves up to 30 metres (100 ft) high. It was one of the deadliest natural disasters in recorded history.

There were 14 countries affected. Since the 14th letter of the alphabet is N

14 = N,

there is only one solution to the date

14 N________?

and that is

14 November

the day the pilots observed the Tic Tac UFO in the water.

The UFO is not here for the purpose of some deranged shamans channeling Ashtar Command while armed with the prez's announcement that "UFOs are indeed real." That's not going to happen. I mean the chances that it would are less than those of Nick Pope sneezing thereby turning the universe into a pound of Provolone cheese.

« Last Edit: Dec 23rd, 2017, 7:59pm by travex » User IP Logged

travex
Guest
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #1 on: Jan 5th, 2018, 6:57pm »

on Dec 23rd, 2017, 7:45pm, travex wrote:
1st day: November 14, 2004
43th day: December 26, 2004




The following part has a bit advanced feature. It starts a process of confirmation and again rests on the premise that connects two events through the rank and order.

It's true that Chester W. Nimitz, which the involved aircraft carrier was named after, was a fleet admiral, but above him was the president as the supreme commander. Since the observed object was spotted in the water - not long before the huge tsunami devastated the coastal areas of Indonesia - one would suspect that the order of US presidents is the link between the date the object was spotted by the Navy pilots and the date the monster tsunami hit, as shown in the previous post. Here is the argument once again. If the day the object was spotted is the day number 1, and, in the year 2004, the 43rd president of USA George W. Bush was in office, then

Day 1: November 14, 2004 (UFO spotted in the water)
Day 43: December 26, 2004 (Indonesian tsunami)

Note the W=W identity in the middle names of both top commanders.

Chester W. Nimitz
George W. Bush


The identical middle name initials stand in this case for parameters Where/What = West/Wind that the observing pilot must mention during the in-flight conversation: The wind is 120 knots to the west.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html

Now pay attention to the complement of the initial W in the word "wind."

W(IND)

The complement IND doesn't not stand for INDIANA but INDONESIA where the killer tsunami originated.

The above relationship is not that difficult to uncover, but the next one is virtually out of reach for the earth-based human mind, because it involves character transformations:

1) water--> ?

2) water--> H2O | chemical symbol of water

3) water--> H2O --> ?

4) water--> H2O --> HHO | two molecules of Hydrogen and one molecule of Oxygen

5) water--> H2O --> HHO --> ?

6) water--> H2O --> HHO --> 118 | atomic numbers of elements: H=1, O=8

7) water--> H2O --> HHO --> 118 --> ?

8) water --> H2O --> HHO --> 118 --> 1-18 | a separation takes place (why?)

9) water --> H2O --> HHO --> 118 --> A-18 | the first letter of the alphabet is A, or 1=A; it is no longer 1=H. Hence the separation 1-18.

10) water --> H2O --> HHO --> 118 --> A-18 --> ?

This is extremely difficult; our brain is not just advanced enough to go on and transform further. But we can ask UFO pilot colonel Natasha Chimponello and she said that A-18 is an incomplete statement. So we ask her nicely, give her a treat, and she will complete for us.

A-18 --> F/A-18 Super Hornet

On November 14, 2004, two F/A-18F Super Hornets from the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz off the coast of San Diego were contacted while on a training mission by a nearby U.S. Navy guided missile cruiser, USS Princeton, and instructed to investigate a mysterious aircraft that Princeton had been tracking for two weeks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nimitz_UFO_incident

That's why the pilot of the F/A-18 Super Hornet spotted the UFO for the first time in the water. That's because there is a transformation link between water and the name of the jet fighter they flew.

water -----------> F/A-18 Super Hornet

Unlike the mismatched video, the conversation between both Navy pilots was genuine and it described exactly what they saw. The ET's anti-hoax measures cannot be breached, because the current state of human mind is not capable of defeating those measures.


Edit: BOTH the video and the conversation relates to some other encounter between the Navy and a UFO, but it refers to the one that took place off Southern California coast on November 14, 2004. This crap is way too advanced to be followed. rolleyes
« Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2018, 8:37pm by travex » User IP Logged

travex
Guest
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #2 on: Jan 19th, 2018, 01:57am »

This, probably final part, may rather appeal to those folks who prefer the traditional way of looking at the UFO cases of this category.

It's been long suspected that Pentagon has plenty of files containing reports on encounters between UFO's and the military installations of various kinds. From incidents, like the one involving a strange submersible object and its "Tic Tac" company, it seems to be that the encounters are initiated by the ET's themselves. If it's so, why?

Oh, wouldn't it be wonderful to make friends with the ET's, so they could spy on the Russians with complete impunity?

It's November 2004 and two Navy pilots report an encounter with an underwater object that was absolutely unfamiliar to them. The next month, a colossal tsunami devastates coastal areas in Indonesia. Was it possible that the ET's informed Pentagon of a new weapons system idea?

Russia’s developing 100 megaton dirty Tsunami Creating submarine drone bomb
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/03/russias-developing-100-megaton-dirty.html

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/262309-pentagon-report-confirms-russian-development-massive-nuclear-torpedo

And that's supposed to be news? According to the Nimitz UFO sighting story that The New York Times broke in the last month of 2017, the ET's informed the Pentagon already in 2004 that the Russians got the idea of developing a nukes-carrying underwater drone that would create a super-massive tsunami that would put out of business naval installations. Has your aircraft carrier Nimitz suffered a battle damage and needs a repair? Tough luck - there is no facility to repair the carrier. The tsunami took it all inland.

It is a known fact that only the president can direct the use of nuclear weapons, so let's do once again the initial verification process that ties the Nimitz UFO encounter to the Indonesia tsunami and consequently to the tsunami-creating nuclear torpedo:

In November 14, 2004, the date of the UFO encounter, the Supreme Commander of US armed Forces was George W. Bush - the 43. US president. Counting that day as Day #1, it turns out that the Day #43 was December 26, 2004 - the fateful day when tens of thousands earth-based humans drowned falling victims to a huge tsunami. Did the Pentagon analysts also count and compare saying hmm... that's a weird coincidence?

Well, we'll find out on January 29, 2018.

This is kind of boring, though. The news from Russia is far more exciting: The Russians wanted the "nuclear torpedo" - the symbolic model of which the Navy pilots saw during the encounter back in November 2004. The problem was that the Russian designers ran into serious technical difficulties. And so, on one nice day, a UFO landed near Magnitogorsk, Russia, and an exchange took place. An ET dressed in silver overalls handed blueprints to a Russian general who turned back to approximately one hundred children and ordered them to board the alien craft. Then he became kind of curious and asked the ET: "Listen, what you are going to do with those kids?" The ET guy gave him an incredulous look and said: "What do you mean? We eat them, don't you know? Yummy, yummy."
« Last Edit: Jan 19th, 2018, 02:15am by travex » User IP Logged

thelmadonna
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 275
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #3 on: Jan 19th, 2018, 07:34am »

Quote:
: "Listen, what you are going to do with those kids?" The ET guy gave him an incredulous look and said: "What do you mean? We eat them, don't you know? Yummy, yummy."


Now I know for sure you are not right in the head!
« Last Edit: Jan 19th, 2018, 07:35am by thelmadonna » User IP Logged

non sinas bastardi tere te deorsum
travex
Guest
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #4 on: Jan 20th, 2018, 01:33am »

on Jan 19th, 2018, 07:34am, thelmadonna wrote:
Now I know for sure you are not right in the head!


LOL. You must be surely one of those real scientists, like Seth Shostak from the SETI.

Why Real Scientists Think Aliens Would Never Eat Humans
http://time.com/4766642/why-aliens-would-probably-come-in-peace/

I think I've been reading too much of the "the truth is out there" UFO literature.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/beckybarnicoat/terrifying-alien-abduction-stories-thatll-fuck-you-up?utm_term=.fg7xE8nXd#.pfrP7Dq0k

Why don't you go and look in the mirror?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_cannibalism

You really are sick, sapiens.
sad
User IP Logged

thelmadonna
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 275
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #5 on: Jan 20th, 2018, 11:39am »

Quote:
I think I've
been reading too much of the "the truth is out there" UFO literature.


You most probably are right there. Too much I think it blown your mind.

Quote:
LOL. You must be surely one of those real scientists, like Seth Shostak from the SETI.


I am a no one. Never read a Shostak book, or any other from the UFO genre.

Quote:
Why don't you go and look in the mirror?


I don't own any mirrors, they are bad for you.

I also don't read any of the links. I have nothing to learn from you.

If you are anywhere as clever as you think you are Why haven;t you solved the likes of Fukishima?
User IP Logged

non sinas bastardi tere te deorsum
ZETAR
Mod Director
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

GREAT SPIRITS ALWAYS ENCOUNTER THE MOST VIOLENT OPPOSITION FROM MEDIOCRE MINDS E=MC2


PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 8649
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #6 on: Jan 20th, 2018, 1:02pm »

wink

User Image

CLEVER QUESTION ~ "solved the likes of Fukushima?"

SHALOM...Z
« Last Edit: Jan 20th, 2018, 7:22pm by ZETAR » User IP Logged

GREAT SPIRITS ALWAYS ENCOUNTER THE MOST VIOLENT OPPOSITION FROM MEDIOCRE MINDS E=MC2
travex
Guest
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #7 on: Jan 22nd, 2018, 02:25am »

on Jan 20th, 2018, 11:39am, thelmadonna wrote:
I also don't read any of the links. I have nothing to learn from you.

In that case you should ignore my posts and stop trolling the threads with your ad hominem remarks.

Quote:
If you are anywhere as clever as you think you are Why haven;t you solved the likes of Fukishima?

I did solve the mystery of Fukushima, meaning the mystery of the sea water getting into the reactor causing it to blow up: Since "C" is spelled not only as "see" but also as "sea," the sea water penetrated Fukushima reactor right here: FU*KUSHIMA. That's why the whole thing blew into the pieces: FU*K-US-HIM-A
http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/nuke_fig2.jpg


« Last Edit: Jan 22nd, 2018, 02:27am by travex » User IP Logged

thelmadonna
Senior Member
ImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 275
xx Re: Making Sense of the "Tic Tac" UFO
« Reply #8 on: Jan 22nd, 2018, 06:00am »

Forgive me for not taking instruction from you. That is what the Mods job is.
You did not solve the problem. Your analysis only gave route and cause. C, see, sea, try adding a little d and you may come closer to the solution.
User IP Logged

non sinas bastardi tere te deorsum
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

Become a member of the UFO Casebook Forum today and join our more than 19,000 members.

Visit the UFO Casebook Web Site

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls